Translate

Showing posts with label main stream media lies and disinformation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label main stream media lies and disinformation. Show all posts

Thursday, 23 February 2017

Transpicuous News, Feb 23,2017: The Mandela Effect Elephant in the Room



 I love when the Media make their agendas so transparent.  Tonight we're going to look at the main stream media's definitive attempt to jump on the "Mandela Effect" bandwagon to co-opt the term into the category of  "Crazy Conspiracy Theory"... and don't you know?  You all just don't remember jack shit!!

Challenge to all purported investigative journalists and so called reporters:  How about sitting down and discussing the REAL Mandela Effect Elephant in the room?

.... Just sayin'.

d






Links for this episode of Transpicuous News:




http://www.cnbc.com/2017/02/22/alternate-realities-and-trump-mandala-effect-and-what-cern-does.html

http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/crux/2017/02/16/mandela-effect-false-memories/#.WK7JJFUrLIU

http://www.express.co.uk/news/weird/763194/Mandela-Effect-Conspiracy-theory-parallel-universes

http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slatest/2017/02/02/eli_whitney_inventor_of_the_cotton_gin_wasn_t_black_but_here_s_why_so_many.html

http://theparisnews.com/news/article_7f5c2f46-f91d-11e6-9050-7bba2de76893.html

http://www.mediapost.com/publications/article/293924/the-trumpela-effect.html

http://www.fanragsports.com/podcast/relatively-speaking-podcast-boogie-gone-new-orleans/

http://www.cosmopolitan.com/lifestyle/a7664693/mandela-effect-examples/

https://psmag.com/on-a-grandmas-house-and-the-unknowability-of-the-past-64a2f7d9808c#.40717dcue

http://chronicle.augusta.com/news/2017-02-13/kirby-hearts-and-minds-follow-custom-feb-14

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-4127782/How-remember-known-images.html

https://champions.co/p/nxt-takeover-san-antonio-review-grades-recap/4198878

http://www.inquisitr.com/3956438/donald-trump-is-predicted-to-trigger-the-apocalypse-claim-bible-scholars/




Monday, 19 October 2015

CERN & Solar Update- Oct 19 2015

Well, after last nights Transpicuous News Report, where I ended the show with the latest CERN "news", I woke up to yet another interesting article from the London Rag news"paper", the Express:

Scientists at Large Hadron Collider hope to make contact with PARALLEL UNIVERSE in days

SCIENTISTS conducting a mindbending experiment at the Large Hadron Collider next week hope to connect with a PARALLEL UNIVERSE outside of our own.

 

Followed by This one:


Did parallel universe open up? Hundreds see 'floating city' filmed in skies above China

CHINESE TV news reports have told how thousands of residents in TWO areas reported separately seeing a huge city form in the skies.

The interesting part of this "news" story is the very last paragraph:

"The apparition, which was witnessed by hundreds of shocked residents, only lasted a few minutes before completely disappearing."
The channel speculated it could be "the result of a project blue beam test."
Project Blue Beam is a prolific conspiracy theory which believes NASA will one day
simulate an alien invasion of Earth or second coming of Christ through holograms.

Are you kidding me?  Did a main stream media (albeit junky) just openly talk about Project Blue Beam?   Holographic invasion by aliens?  Faked second coming of Christ?!?  ....

REALLY?!?

Of course they use the ol' "Conspiracy Theory" tag line, but I found the play out of these two articles very interesting given all the stuff that's been going on this past few weeks....

Anyway, With the announcement by CERN that they may be opening a "parallel universe", I figured I'd better keep a close eye on CERN.

The past week I've been sorta ridiculously busy so I haven't been watching CERN as closely as I usually do, but there have been a few interesting things showing up in the graphs.

First up, here is a screen shot of CERN Operations as of 10am UTC this morning,  and sure enough there was a couple of interesting things in the past day.  "Bobbles" that I've not really seen before.



the Beam dump information doesn't line up with what is seen on the graphs.... sorta.  Or, let's just say, it looks like the graphs have been set up to be misleading- as they say "No Beam".... and yet the dump is showing a beam.... oh and that little beam blip at just before 11am GMT...  the dump is showing the last injection at 1:48 last night.... and no dump after that.





So I went to take a look at the solar info for the past few days.  While the sun has been supposedly quiet for the past 36 hours - no flares to speak of- there are active xrays and an uptick from the coronal hole that is facing us.   But more interesting is the geomagnetic info for the past 24 hours or so.



Coronal Hole Earth facing
Geomagnetic storm mid day Oct 18
You can see the Magnetopause crimping inward and distorting in several frames- cross reference the time with CERN


You can see on the Magnetopause pics that at the times when CERN was showing strange "bobbles" that I haven't seen before- remember that CERN is one hour ahead of UTC timing for the Solar information..

In the UnFuckers Unite Facebook group we've been having quite a few conversations about the "physical", so to speak, "symptoms" that are being experienced across a broad spectrum of people over the past week especially.   With the "Notice" type article put out in the past few days about scientists using magnetics to literally numb and change people minds.... well, it puts CERN that much more directly in my focus of attention to keep an eye on.

Mind hack: Scientists use magnets to change attitudes on immigration, religion 












Friday, 9 October 2015

Before and After: A Picture of Opposites

As history is changed on a daily basis, and propaganda seems to wipe clean peoples memories when it comes to the past, sometimes we need to really look at what is being rewritten, and WHY.

Back in 2011 the famous magazine, Vogue, did a huge article about the First Lady of Syria: Asma Al-Assad, calling her the "Lady Diana of the Middle East".  When it became clear that the articles glowing tribute to the first family of Syria was NOT going to work with the propaganda that was being spun by the US and UK to destroy Al Assad, Vogue was forced to remove the article.

I've posted the entire article below... just in case it too, suddenly disappears.

This article is a vital piece of "history", if you will, a reminder of how Syria was viewed BEFORE the US began it's deliberate and destructive propaganda machine against Assad. I would like you to compare this article from Vogue in 2011, to the article published in The Guardian in 2012- AFTER the propaganda to destroy the "Assad Regime" was pushed out across the Main Stream Media. 

I have put the Guardian article right below the Vogue article.

The Main Stream Media are the perpetrators of the Lies & Propaganda of the Government Controllers.  The Fact remains that while Assad isn't "innocent"- and like all other world leaders is definitely part of the problem that we, the people of the world, face- he is not the "Evil" that he is painted by the US.  The Template is one that the US has used over and over again, openly and even admittedly.  The "Confessions of an Economic Hitman", outlines this template very very clearly.

... When the US government FULLY admits that the CIA was used to overthrow the Iranian Government in 1953, you HAVE to look at the Template they used then, and CONTINUE to use to this very day.

.... "Arab Spring" in Syria was a carbon copy of what done in Iran in 1953.  Anyone who can't see this, should definitely take a second look at the fluoride and Lithium intake. 

... Just sayin'.


Now cross reference this with what we know about the Saudi Royal family and the history of Wahhabism- who started it, who controls it and what the agenda is....


... and who is controlling the vast majority of US Congress.


d

The Only Remaining Online Copy of Vogue's Asma al-Assad Profile

In February, Vogue magazine published, for the benefit of its 11.7 million readers, an article titled "A Rose in the Desert" about the first lady of Syria. Asma al-Assad has British roots, wears designer fashion, worked for years in banking, and is married to the dictator Bashar al-Assad, whose regime has killed over 5,000 civilians and hundreds of children this year. The glowing article praised the Assads as a "wildly democratic" family-focused couple who vacation in Europe, foster Christianity, are at ease with American celebrities, made theirs the "safest country in the Middle East," and want to give Syria a "brand essence."

Vogue's editors defended the controversial article as "a way of opening a window into this world a little bit," conceding only that Assad's Syria is "not as secular as we might like." A senior editor responsible for the story told me the magazine stood by it. A few weeks later, the article and all references to it were removed from Vogue's website without explanation. In August, The Hill reported that U.S. lobbying firm Brown Lloyd James had been paid $5,000 per month by the Syrian government to arrange for and manage the Vogue article.

Read entire article here:  http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2012/01/the-only-remaining-online-copy-of-vogues-asma-al-assad-profile/250753/ 

A Rose in the Desert: Asma Al-Assad, Lady Diana of the Middle East

Image
© James Nachtwey
Asma al-Assad is glamorous, young, and very chic - the freshest and most magnetic of first ladies. Her style is not the couture-and-bling dazzle of Middle Eastern power but a deliberate lack of adornment. She's a rare combination: a thin, long-limbed beauty with a trained analytic mind who dresses with cunning understatement. Paris Match calls her "the element of light in a country full of shadow zones." She is the first lady of Syria.

Syria is known as the safest country in the Middle East, possibly because, as the State Department's Web site says, "the Syrian government conducts intense physical and electronic surveillance of both Syrian citizens and foreign visitors." It's a secular country where women earn as much as men and the Muslim veil is forbidden in universities, a place without bombings, unrest, or kidnappings, but its shadow zones are deep and dark. Asma's husband, Bashar al-Assad, was elected president in 2000, after the death of his father, Hafez al-Assad, with a startling 97 percent of the vote. In Syria, power is hereditary. The country's alliances are murky. How close are they to Iran, Hamas, and Hezbollah? There are souvenir Hezbollah ashtrays in the souk, and you can spot the Hamas leadership racing through the bar of the Four Seasons. Its number-one enmity is clear: Israel. But that might not always be the case. The United States has just posted its first ambassador there since 2005, Robert Ford.

Iraq is next door, Iran not far away. Lebanon's capital, Beirut, is 90 minutes by car from Damascus. Jordan is south, and next to it the region that Syrian maps label Palestine. There are nearly one million refugees from Iraq in Syria, and another half-million displaced Palestinians.

Image
"It's a tough neighborhood," admits Asma al-Assad.

It's also a neighborhood intoxicatingly close to the dawn of civilization, where agriculture began some 10,000 years ago, where the wheel, writing, and musical notation were invented. Out in the desert are the magical remains of Palmyra, Apamea, and Ebla. In the National Museum you see small 4,000-year-old panels inlaid with mother-of-pearl that is echoed in the new mother-of-pearl furniture for sale in the souk. Christian Louboutin comes to buy the damask silk brocade they've been making here since the Middle Ages for his shoes and bags, and has incidentally purchased a small palace in Aleppo, which, like Damascus, has been inhabited for more than 5,000 years.

The first lady works out of a small white building in a hilly, modern residential neighborhood called Muhajireen, where houses and apartments are crammed together and neighbors peer and wave from balconies. The first impression of Asma al-Assad is movement - a determined swath cut through space with a flash of red soles. Dark-brown eyes, wavy chin-length brown hair, long neck, an energetic grace. No watch, no jewelry apart from Chanel agates around her neck, not even a wedding ring, but fingernails lacquered a dark blue-green. She's breezy, conspiratorial, and fun. Her accent is English but not plummy. Despite what must be a killer IQ, she sometimes uses urban shorthand: "I was, like. . . ."

Asma Akhras was born in London in 1975, the eldest child and only daughter of a Syrian Harley Street cardiologist and his diplomat wife, both Sunni Muslims. They spoke Arabic at home. She grew up in Ealing, went to Queen's College, and spent holidays with family in Syria. "I've dealt with the sense that people don't expect Syria to be normal. I'd show my London friends my holiday snaps and they'd be - 'Where did you say you went?'"
Image
© James Nachtwey
She studied computer science at university, then went into banking. "It wasn't a typical path for women," she says, "but I had it all mapped out." By the spring of 2000, she was closing a big biotech deal at JP Morgan in London and about to take up an MBA at Harvard. She started dating a family friend: the second son of president Hafez al-Assad, Bashar, who'd cut short his ophthalmology studies in London in 1994 and returned to Syria after his older brother, Basil, heir apparent to power, died in a car crash. They had known each other forever, but a ten-year age difference meant that nothing registered - until it did.

"I was always very serious at work, and suddenly I started to take weekends, or disappear, and people just couldn't figure it out," explains the first lady. "What do you say - 'I'm dating the son of a president'? You just don't say that. Then he became president, so I tried to keep it low-key. Suddenly I was turning up in Syria every month, saying, 'Granny, I miss you so much!' I quit in October because by then we knew that we were going to get married at some stage. I couldn't say why I was leaving. My boss thought I was having a nervous breakdown because nobody quits two months before bonus after closing a really big deal. He wouldn't accept my resignation. I was, like, 'Please, really, I just want to get out, I've had enough,' and he was 'Don't worry, take time off, it happens to the best of us.'" She left without her bonus in November and married Bashar al-Assad in December.
Image
"What I've been able to take away from banking was the transferable skills - the analytical thinking, understanding the business side of running a company - to run an NGO or to try and oversee a project." She runs her office like a business, chairs meeting after meeting, starts work many days at six, never breaks for lunch, and runs home to her children at four. "It's my time with them, and I get them fresh, unedited - I love that. I really do." Her staff are used to eating when they can. "I have a rechargeable battery," she says.

The 35-year-old first lady's central mission is to change the mind-set of six million Syrians under eighteen, encourage them to engage in what she calls 'active citizenship'. "It's about everyone taking shared responsibility in moving this country forward, about empowerment in a civil society. We all have a stake in this country; it will be what we make it."
Image
Image
In 2005 she founded Massar, built around a series of discovery centers where children and young adults from five to 21 engage in creative, informal approaches to civic responsibility. Massar's mobile Green Team has touched 200,000 kids across Syria since 2005. The organization is privately funded through donations. The Syria Trust for Development, formed in 2007, oversees Massar as well as her first NGO, the rural micro-credit association FIRDOS, and SHABAB, which exists to give young people business skills they need for the future.

And then there's her cultural mission: "People tend to see Syria as artifacts and history," she says. "For us it's about the accumulation of cultures, traditions, values, customs. It's the difference between hardware and software: the artifacts are the hardware, but the software makes all the difference - the customs and the spirit of openness. We have to make sure that we don't lose that. . . . " Here she gives an apologetic grin. "You have to excuse me, but I'm a banker - that brand essence."

Image
That brand essence includes the distant past. There are 500,000 important ancient works of art hidden in storage; Asma al-Assad has brought in the Louvre to create a network of museums and cultural attractions across Syria, and asked Italian experts to help create a database of the 5,000 archaeological sites in the desert. "Culture," she says, "is like a financial asset. We have an abundance of it, thousands of years of history, but we can't afford to be complacent."

In December, Asma al-Assad was in Paris to discuss her alliance with the Louvre. She dazzled a tough French audience at the International Diplomatic Institute, speaking without notes. "I'm not trying to disguise culture as anything more than it is," she said, "and if I sound like I'm talking politics, it's because we live in a politicized region, a politicized time, and we are affected by that."

The French ambassador to Syria, Eric Chevallier, was there: "She managed to get people to consider the possibilities of a country that's modernizing itself, that stands for a tolerant secularism in a powder-keg region, with extremists and radicals pushing in from all sides - and the driving force for that rests largely on the shoulders of one couple. I hope they'll make the right choices for their country and the region. "
Image
Damascus evokes a dusty version of a Mediterranean hill town in an Eastern-bloc country. The courtyard of the Umayyad Mosque at night looks exactly like St. Mark's square in Venice. When I first arrive, I'm met on the tarmac by a minder, who gives me a bouquet of white roses and lends me a Syrian cell phone; the head minder, a high-profile American PR, joins us the next day. The first lady's office has provided drivers, so I shop and see sights in a bubble of comfort and hospitality. On the rare occasions I am out alone, a random series of men in leather jackets seems to be keeping close tabs on what I am doing and where I am headed.

"I like things I can touch. I like to get out and meet people and do things," the first lady says as we set off for a meeting in a museum and a visit to an orphanage. "As a banker, you have to be so focused on the job at hand that you lose the experience of the world around you. My husband gave me back something I had lost."
Image
She slips behind the wheel of a plain SUV, a walkie-talkie and her cell thrown between the front seats and a Syrian-silk Louboutin tote on top. She does what the locals do - swerves to avoid crazy men who run across busy freeways, misses her turn, checks your seat belt, points out sights, and then can't find a parking space. When a traffic cop pulls her over at a roundabout, she lowers the tinted window and dips her head with a playful smile. The cop's eyes go from slits to saucers.

Her younger brother Feras, a surgeon who moved to Syria to start a private health-care group, says, "Her intelligence is both intellectual and emotional, and she's a master at harmonizing when, and how much, to use of each one."
Image
In the Saint Paul orphanage, maintained by the Melkite - Greek Catholic patriarchate and run by the Basilian sisters of Aleppo, Asma sits at a long table with the children. Two little boys in new glasses and thick sweaters are called Yussuf. She asks them what kind of music they like. "Sad music," says one. In the room where she's had some twelve computers installed, the first lady tells a nun, "I hope you're letting the younger children in here go crazy on the computers." The nun winces: "The children are afraid to learn in case they don't have access to computers when they leave here," she says.

In the courtyard by the wall down which Saint Paul escaped in a basket 2,000 years ago, an old tree bears gigantic yellow fruit I have never seen before. Citrons. Cédrats in French.
Image
Back in the car, I ask what religion the orphans are. "It's not relevant," says Asma al-Assad. "Let me try to explain it to you. That church is a part of my heritage because it's a Syrian church. The Umayyad Mosque is the third-most-important holy Muslim site, but within the mosque is the tomb of Saint John the Baptist. We all kneel in the mosque in front of the tomb of Saint John the Baptist. That's how religions live together in Syria - a way that I have never seen anywhere else in the world. We live side by side, and have historically. All the religions and cultures that have passed through these lands - the Armenians, Islam, Christianity, the Umayyads, the Ottomans - make up who I am."

Image
"Does that include the Jews?" I ask.

"And the Jews," she answers. "There is a very big Jewish quarter in old Damascus."

The Jewish quarter of Damascus spans a few abandoned blocks in the old city that emptied out in 1992, when most of the Syrian Jews left. Their houses are sealed up and have not been touched, because, as people like to tell you, Syrians don't touch the property of others. The broken glass and sagging upper floors tell a story you don't understand - are the owners coming back to claim them one day?

The presidential family lives surrounded by neighbors in a modern apartment in Malki. On Friday, the Muslim day of rest, Asma al-Assad opens the door herself in jeans and old suede stiletto boots, hair in a ponytail, the word happiness spelled out across the back of her T-shirt. At the bottom of the stairs stands the off-duty president in jeans - tall, long-necked, blue-eyed. A precise man who takes photographs and talks lovingly about his first computer, he says he was attracted to studying eye surgery "because it's very precise, it's almost never an emergency, and there is very little blood."

Image
The old al-Assad family apartment was remade into a child-friendly triple-decker playroom loft surrounded by immense windows on three sides. With neither shades nor curtains, it's a fishbowl. Asma al-Assad likes to say, "You're safe because you are surrounded by people who will keep you safe." Neighbors peer in, drop by, visit, comment on the furniture. The president doesn't mind: "This curiosity is good: They come to see you, they learn more about you. You don't isolate yourself."

There's a decorated Christmas tree. Seven-year-old Zein watches Tim Burton's Alice in Wonderland on the president's iMac; her brother Karim, six, builds a shark out of Legos; and nine-year-old Hafez tries out his new electric violin. All three go to a Montessori school.

Asma al-Assad empties a box of fondue mix into a saucepan for lunch. The household is run on wildly democratic principles. "We all vote on what we want, and where," she says. The chandelier over the dining table is made of cut-up comic books. "They outvoted us three to two on that."

A grid is drawn on a blackboard, with ticks for each member of the family. "We were having trouble with politeness, so we made a chart: ticks for when they spoke as they should, and a cross if they didn't." There's a cross next to Asma's name. "I shouted," she confesses. "I can't talk about empowering young people, encouraging them to be creative and take responsibility, if I'm not like that with my own children."

"The first challenge for us was, Who's going to define our lives, us or the position?" says the president. "We wanted to live our identity honestly."
Image
They announced their marriage in January 2001, after the ceremony, which they kept private. There was deliberately no photograph of Asma. "The British media picked that up as: Now she's moved into the presidential palace, never to be seen again!" says Asma, laughing.

They had a reason: "She spent three months incognito," says the president. "Before I had any official engagement," says the first lady, "I went to 300 villages, every governorate, hospitals, farms, schools, factories, you name it - I saw everything to find out where I could be effective. A lot of the time I was somebody's 'assistant' carrying the bag, doing this and that, taking notes. Nobody asked me if I was the first lady; they had no idea."

Image
"That way," adds the president, "she started her NGO before she was ever seen in public as my wife. Then she started to teach people that an NGO is not a charity."

Neither of them believes in charity for the sake of charity. "We have the Iraqi refugees," says the president. "Everybody is talking about it as a political problem or as welfare, charity. I say it's neither - it's about cultural philosophy. We have to help them. That's why the first thing I did is to allow the Iraqis to go into schools. If they don't have an education, they will go back as a bomb, in every way: terrorism, extremism, drug dealers, crime. If I have a secular and balanced neighbor, I will be safe."

When Angelina Jolie came with Brad Pitt for the United Nations in 2009, she was impressed by the first lady's efforts to encourage empowerment among Iraqi and Palestinian refugees but alarmed by the Assads' idea of safety.

"My husband was driving us all to lunch," says Asma al-Assad, "and out of the corner of my eye I could see Brad Pitt was fidgeting. I turned around and asked, 'Is anything wrong?' "

Image
"Where's your security?" asked Pitt.

"So I started teasing him - 'See that old woman on the street? That's one of them! And that old guy crossing the road? That's the other one!'"

They both laugh.

The president joins in the punch line: "Brad Pitt wanted to send his security guards here to come and get some training!"

After lunch, Asma al-Assad drives to the airport, where a Falcon 900 is waiting to take her to Massar in Latakia, on the coast. When she lands, she jumps behind the wheel of another SUV waiting on the tarmac. This is the kind of surprise visit she specializes in, but she has no idea how many kids will turn up at the community center on a rainy Friday.

Image
As it turns out, it's full. Since the first musical notation was discovered nearby, at Ugarit, the immaculate Massar center in Latakia is built around music. Local kids are jamming in a sound booth; a group of refugee Palestinian girls is playing instruments. Others play chess on wall-mounted computers. These kids have started online blood banks, run marathons to raise money for dialysis machines, and are working on ways to rid Latakia of plastic bags. Apart from a few girls in scarves, you can't tell Muslims from Christians.

Asma al-Assad stands to watch a laborious debate about how - and whether - to standardize the Arabic spelling of the word Syria. Then she throws out a curve ball. "I've been advised that we have to close down this center so as to open another one somewhere else," she says. Kids' mouths drop open. Some repress tears. Others are furious. One boy chooses altruism: "That's OK. We know how to do it now; we'll help them."

Then the first lady announces, "That wasn't true. I just wanted to see how much you care about Massar."

As the pilot expertly avoids sheet lightning above the snow-flecked desert on the way back, she explains, "There was a little bit of formality in what they were saying to me; it wasn't real. Tricks like this help - they became alive, they became passionate. We need to get past formalities if we are going to get anything done."

Image
Two nights later it's the annual Christmas concert by the children of Al-Farah Choir, run by the Syrian Catholic Father Elias Zahlawi. Just before it begins, Bashar and Asma al-Assad slip down the aisle and take the two empty seats in the front row. People clap, and some call out his nickname:

"Docteur! Docteur!"

Two hundred children dressed variously as elves, reindeers, or candy canes share the stage with members of the national orchestra, who are done up as elves. The show becomes a full-on songfest, with the elves and reindeer and candy canes giving their all to "Hallelujah" and "Joy to the World." The carols slide into a more serpentine rhythm, an Arabic rap group takes over, and then it's back to Broadway mode. The president whispers, "All of these styles belong to our culture. This is how you fight extremism - through art."

Brass bells are handed out. Now we're all singing "Jingle Bell Rock," 1,331 audience members shaking their bells, singing, crying, and laughing.

"This is the diversity you want to see in the Middle East," says the president, ringing his bell. "This is how you can have peace!"
 
***** 

Comment: And that, ladies and gentlemen, is why the Al-Assads must go and why Syria must be razed to the ground.

Vogue, incidentally, removed this article from their website and issued an 'apology' for publishing something contrary to the propaganda dictates of the brutish oligarchs ruling the Western Empire.



http://www.sott.net/article/264587-A-Rose-in-the-Desert-Asma-Al-Assad-Lady-Diana-of-the-Middle-East


How Syria's 'desert rose' became 'the first lady of hell'


Spot the difference in these two pieces about the wife of the Syrian president, Bashar Hafez al-Assad:
"Asma al-Assad is a glamorous, young, and very chic - the freshest and most magnetic of first ladies. Her style is not the couture-and-bling dazzle of Middle Eastern power but a deliberate lack of adornment. She's a rare combination: a thin, long-limbed beauty with a trained analytic mind who dresses with cunning understatement... She's breezy, conspiratorial, and fun."
Asma al-Assad is "a good-looking woman of 35... as brisk as a prefect, as on-message as a banker, as friendly as a new acquaintance at a friend's cocktail party... like the kind of young Englishwoman you'd hear having lunch at the next table at Harvey Nichols... the first lady of hell."
The first quote was from a Vogue article in March 2011 headlined "A rose in the desert." The second from a Newsweek/Daily Beast article on Monday headlined: "Mrs Assad duped me." The writer in both cases was Joan Juliet Buck, an experienced fashion journalist and one-time editor-in-chief of French Vogue.
Her first article, published as Syria's government started to attack citizens, was met with a wave of criticism. Both Buck and Vogue's editor, Anna Wintour, were accused of taking part in a public relations campaign on behalf of the Syrian regime.
Within a month or so, the article was removed from the magazine's website. Almost a year later Wintour broke her silence on the matter to explain that "we were hopeful that the Assad regime would be open to a more progressive society" but "as the terrible events of the past year and a half unfolded in Syria, it became clear that its priorities and values were completely at odds with those of Vogue."
Buck's contract with Vogue was not renewed and that's when she decided to offer an a 5,000-word explanation for her original sin.
It suggests that she was the victim of of manipulation from beginning to end. She initially rejected the assignment; claimed she didn't know she was going to meet a murderer; and was taken in by Asma al-Assad's glossy presentation of herself as a cosy, modern, relaxed person.
But Styleite writer, Hilary George-Parkin, is not impressed with Buck's mea culpa. She writes:
"It is not hard to imagine this kind charade fooling a rookie journalist. But, of course, that is hardly what Buck was at the time. She goes on, however, to reveal further manipulation by those surrounding the Assads, including a hacked computer, carefully-monitored cell phone given to her at the start of her trip, and leaked emails between PR reps discussing the need to conceal any potentially damaging information. None of these points were mentioned in the profile... raving about Asma al-Assad's elegant wardrobe, posh stature, and democratic parenting style."
And Homa Khaleeli, writing in a Guardian blog, was also contemptuous of Buck's attempt at exculpation: "The mea culpa is almost as disastrous as the initial interview", she writes.
"It's hard to tell if Buck asked Asma – or Bashar whom she also met – any real questions at all. Certainly not why anyone would marry a man whose father slaughtered 20,000 people in three weeks... She did not ask why her phone and computer were bugged, or even why she had spotted something that looks like a mobile prison in the souk."
Khaleeli continues: "To be fair to Buck she does explain that she had not wanted to meet the Assads, but Vogue told her they wanted no focus on politics at all... It seems clear that Vogue is equally to blame for the controversy."

From The Guardian here: http://www.theguardian.com/media/greenslade/2012/aug/01/asma-al-assad-anna-wintour


Sunday, 25 January 2015

"Good Cop, Bad Cop": The final act on the Global Stage of US vs Them

In preparation for tonight's Transpicuous News Report, I have a couple of articles I want to direct your attention to- call it "pre" homework, if you will.  This first one is a set of articles put out by Ken at redefininggod.com. 

Over the course of the past few months I have been setting the stage, so to speak, for what I wish to talk about tonight on Transpicuous News.  I have used the expression "Same girl, different party dress" for years now when speaking about the so called "New" financial system that "they" are/have created.  I have talked about the fact that all these various movements and actions by "different" groups/countries/organizations to plant their flag at the top of the dung heap, are nothing more than public posturing that means nothing, as they are all just a continuation of Slavery 2.0.  This is a VITALLY important piece of the puzzle that people need to clearly understand.

This morning I went searching to find some of the back ground information that I've read over the years, to clearly outline the points I wish to make tonight on the show,  and low and behold, Ken has pulled the vast majority of all of that work together in several very well researched articles that he has published at Redefininggod.  .... I am not one to look a gift horse in the mouth, so to Ken I say thank you for doing all my dirty work for me and allowing me to focus my attention not on the set up of the maneuvers of the past, but on the actions of the NOW.

At this point in "time" even main stream pundits are stating what the alternative media has been saying for years: That the so called two (three, four) party political systems of "democratic" countries are no more than an illusion of choice.  The reality is that all of these political parties are one and the same and working for exactly the same goals.  Of course the booby prize for making this fully transparent goes to US Congress, which has thoroughly highlighted and blazingly shone a spotlight on the fact that it doesn't matter which "party" is in power- they are all one and the same.  Nothing is done differently as an end result of who has "control" of Congress.  While it's easy to point this out when making fun of the US, Canada, England, Australia, Germany, France...... you name it:  They are all the same, and all run from the same Template.  The vast majority of the "awakened" public know this.

Now comes the jump in reasoning that many people seem to miss.

If the players of the internal, national, "governments" are all the same..... why would anyone think that International politics would be any different?  To clarify: They are all just the same girl in a different party dress GLOBALLY.

The Illusion is that there are different factions, different "controllers", different political/national entities that are all battling for supremacy.  But this is only an Illusion. It is a scam, a misdirection, a ploy placed in front of the public to allow them to maneuver the people into accepting the globalist agenda:  New World Order.

Last week on Transpicuous News I talked about the book "Silent weapons for quiet wars"  and I stated that what we are seeing being played out on the global stage isn't the beginning of "World War III", it is actually the END of it.  In my opinion this is a very important piece of the puzzle that people need to understand, because in understanding that this "WAR" has been raging, quietly, for decades, it allows people to SEE what has actually been done to set up this entire Theatre Production.

... As I said a while ago when talking about the "New" financial system(s) - it doesn't matter who gets to be the proverbial "King of the Castle", because they are ALL THE SAME.

Who wins EVERY war?

The Bankers.

Just think about that fact for a moment.

A couple of months ago I had an intel conversation that spun into focus again this morning.  The person I was talking to (on actually a different topic altogether) stated that the entire "BRICs" movement was just a decoy, and that their "new" banks and systems would look like they are separate entities from the BIS, IMF and World Bank, but in fact they would be under the control of the EXACT same people and would/will be run as a diversionary tactic to give the illusion that there were TWO sides, TWO movements, TWO "choices", TWO different organizations.... when in fact there will be the EXACT SAME CONTROLLERS in charge of BOTH.

Who wins EVERY War?

The Bankers.

Now..... do you SEE what is being done?  Do you see the plan as it has been laid out to misdirect the public from what is really going on?  US vs Russia?  Really?  Yet I've pointed out several articles over the past few weeks that negates that entire "sanctions" scenario- that in fact the US is working with Russia and China on several projects- like the "new" financial ratings company that has been pushed by the main stream and alternative media, that is a three way joint US, Russia and China company.  Like the US buying rockets from Russia.  Like Russia using US Master card for their new internal payments system.

Right now the "big Three" are very publicly gathering up their purported supporters and making "alliances" on the global stage.  But when we really look at some of these various  "alliances" and the "offers" that have been put on the table to different nations- like Venezuela, Nigeria, Zimbabwe, etc....- it is a replica of Hollywood's "Good Cop/Bad Cop" scenario.   The US plays the bully boy, running rough shod over these nations, then China (or Russia) comes along and says "don't worry mate, we can look after you, give you some money, help you out....." and sets in place trade deals and agreements.  On the surface it looks like China is the Good cop, just helping a fella out of a tight spot.  Yet when you see that the US and China are on the SAME  SIDE, then you see that the nation in question just sold out to the ultimate controller anyway.  Which was the plan right from the beginning.

And any "Nation" that doesn't fall in line with that strategy is taken over through WAR - both with bombs and bullets, and financial tools of destruction.  Saddam Hussein, Muammar al-Gaddafi, Kim Jong Il, along with various South/Central American, African and Asian leaders who've been "over thrown" in the past 50 years, have all had one thing in common:  They stood against the Banker Controllers and they were taken down.

Good Cop.  Bad Cop.   They all still work for the same police force.

The Bankers always win the "War".  Once you realize that ONE fact, it puts all of the media circuses, all the political "battles", all of the posturing for "world domination" into perspective.

Do you see?

Later on today I will republish a second article, by the Philosophy of Metrics writer JC Collins, that is the next important piece in the puzzle for people to see.

Tonight, I will discuss many of these aspects of what I have laid out here today with the immense help of Ken and JC and their very well researched articles.

d





China’s complicity in building the Rockefeller New World Order, in their own words…

In my last entry, The Rockefeller Plan for the BRICS New World Order, in their own words, I laid out the Rockefeller Plan for the New World Order (NWO) as reflected in their official blueprint for it, a 1961 book titled Prospect for America. Given the reaction counters I saw for the article, I can tell that I need to explain things even further to reach certain people. So in this entry, I will continue to expose the globalist plot by pointing out how the Chinese government is assisting in the construction of the Rockefeller NWO.
To begin, let’s take a look at…
The Chinese Economic Propaganda Line
In the aftermath of the US Government “shutdown” of October 2013, I came across a very telling Xinhua article titled U.S. fiscal failure warrants a de-Americanized world. If you’re unfamiliar with the Xinhua News Agency, here is a little snippet from their Wikipedia page…
“The Xinhua News Agency is the state press agency of the People’s Republic of China. Xinhua is a ministry-level department subordinate to the State Council. Its president is a member of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China.”
So the information put forth by Xinhua reflects the official propaganda line of the Chinese Communist Party, which makes what the article said all the more interesting. Here is what I wrote about it at the time…
chinacoll
It should be well known to all by now that the mainstream media, as well as the bulk of the alternative media, are attempting to portray a geopolitical conflict featuring the Anglo-American bankers & NATO on one side and the BRICS bankers & militaries on the other. The brings forward an obvious question: if China and their BRICS allies are really acting in opposition to the Western Establishment, why are they pointing to the Western globalist institutions as the solution to the world’s ills?
To help answer that question, let’s have a closer look at the institutions touted by the Chinese article…
1) The United Nations (UN) – According to the Rockefellers’ Prospect for America blueprint for world government, the United Nations is the international body that will exercise authority over regional groupings of the world’s nations. The institution itself was founded at the behest of the Western central banking families, and it was such a pet project of the Rockefellers that they decided where and how it would be built and provided the land on which it now stands.
The United Nations Headquarters complex “was constructed in stages with the core complex completed between 1948 and 1952. The Headquarters occupies a site beside the East River, on 17 acres of land purchased from the foremost New York real estate developer of the time, William Zeckendorf, Sr. Nelson Rockefeller arranged this purchase, after an initial offer to locate it on the Rockefeller family estate of Kykuit was rejected as being too isolated from Manhattan. The US$8.5 million (adjusted by inflation US$83.4 million) purchase was then funded by his father, John D. Rockefeller, Jr., who donated it to the city. Wallace Harrison, the personal architectural adviser for the Rockefeller family, and a prominent corporate architect, served as the Director of Planning for the United Nations Headquarters. His firm, Harrison and Abramovitz, oversaw the execution of the design.”
Upon clicking the link to the Wikipedia entry on Kykuit (the Rockefeller family estate), I found this extra bit of insight…
“In late 1946 two of [John D. Rockefeller] Junior’s sons, John D. 3rd and Laurance, each offered their respective residences, Rockwood Hall and Fieldwood Farm, as headquarters for the then newly formed United Nations. Family patriarch Junior vetoed the proposals as too isolated from Manhattan. He tasked second son, Nelson, to buy a 6.9-hectare (17-acre) site along the East River, subsequently donated for the construction of the UN Headquarters.”
Don’t you find it interesting that the location of the United Nations Headquarters was decided by an internal discussion amongst John D. Rockefeller Jr. and his sons?
2) The World Bank (WB) – Many people may be unaware that the World Bank is “a United Nations international financial institution that provides loans to developing countries for capital programs. The World Bank is a component of the World Bank Group, and a member of the United Nations Development Group.” It was created at the Bretton Woods Conference of 1944. And what was the formal name of the Bretton Woods Conference? The “United Nations Monetary and Financial Conference.”
3) The International Monetary Fund (IMF) – The IMF was also a creation of the United Nations Monetary and Financial Conference of 1944. And like the World Bank Group, the IMF is a Specialized Agency of the United Nations.
Specialized Agencies are “autonomous organizations working with the United Nations and each other through the coordinating machinery of the United Nations Economic and Social Council at the intergovernmental level, and through the Chief Executives Board for coordination (CEB) at the inter-secretariat level. Specialized agencies may or may not have been originally created by the United Nations, but they are incorporated into the United Nations System by the United Nations Economic and Social Council acting under Articles 57 and 63 of the United Nations Charter.”
So basically, the UN, WB and IMF are part of one giant globalist complex put in place by the Rockefellers and their affiliated global bankster families. Among the banking clans, the Rockefellers had a very prominent role in the creation of the global government because they were the family whose base nation (the US) emerged from World War 2 with the most wealth and power. The Rockefellers had the biggest tool at their disposal (America), so they wore that tool down to the nub to build the NWO. And this globalist complex is what the Chinese offer as the solution to the world’s problems (which also were created by the bankster families)?
With an overview of the globalist complex in place, let’s have a look at more of what the Chinese have been saying.
China’s Central Banker and the IMF
In the course of researching this article, I came across a link to a March 2009 speech by Zhou Xiaochuan…
zhoupic
…titled “Reform the International Monetary System.”
The speech was given during the depths of the 2007-2009 financial crisis and follows the globalists’ standard “let’s create a problem, then offer our solution” template. He begins by pointing to the problems posed by the (engineered) economic meltdown, then he goes on to explain how a new kind of global reserve currency would solve all those problems. Finally, he makes his recommendation…
“The scope of using the SDR should be broadened, so as to enable it to fully satisfy the [IMF] member countries’ demand for a reserve currency.”
His recommendation for the gradual replacement of existing national reserve currencies with the IMF’s Special Drawing Right (SDR) is the same thing the Western banksters have been calling for since the SDR’s creation (see Mainstream globalist propaganda reveals East/West conflict is a farce).
Zhou’s speech is such a classic example of the problem / reaction / solution strategy that I recommend reading it in its entirety. If you find such speeches too dry and difficult to understand, though, I’ll provide an explanation of the key passages from the speech in Update 1 at the bottom of this article.
Governance changes will turn evil globalist institutions into good?
Bankster propagandists attempt to explain-away the BRICS Alliance’s adherence to the globalist institutions by making the argument that the Alliance is somehow outmaneuvering the Western elite and taking over the institutions from within. In fact, Zhou makes mention of “voice and representation reform” for the IMF in his speech, and he brings it up again in PDF page 4 of his International Monetary and Financial Committee statement from October 11 of this year…
zhougovern3
This widely-parroted propaganda theme of instituting governance reforms to end the “unipolar” dominance of the global institutions by the United States and their Western allies would be convincing except for one thing: the Rockefeller propagandists are using the same talking points as the BRICS propagandists. Here is a portion of an article from Finance and Development Magazine (a quarterly publication of the IMF) titled “World Economy: Convergence, Interdependence, and Divergence” (from PDF page 16)…
fd1
This sounds an awful lot like what Zhou is saying, doesn’t it?
The section continues by spouting off the globalist buzzwords of “interdependent” and “multipolar,” then finishes with a one-line bio of the author…
fd2
So the author of this article is a high-level member of the Brookings Institution, an Establishment think tank headquartered on Embassy Row in Washington, D.C. And do you care to guess who funds the Brookings Institution?…
“In 1952, Robert Calkins succeeded Moulton as president of the Brookings Institution. He secured grants from the Rockefeller Foundation and the Ford Foundation that put the Institution on a strong financial basis. He reorganized the Institution around the Economic Studies, Government Studies, and Foreign Policy Programs.”
By the way, guess who else has ties to the Brookings Institution…
yellenpic
yellenbrook
Given all we’ve seen in this entry and the last, which narrative do you find more likely to be true?
1) That the BRICS Alliance is real, and they’re seizing the globalist institutions from the hands of the “Anglo-American Banking Cabal” in order to stop the NWO?
…or…
2) That the BRICS Alliance is a public relations construct, and within the Worldwide Central Banking Cabal, they’re playing the role of the “solution bringers” who save the day from the “problem creators” in order to garner public acceptance of the NWO?
I’ll leave you to answer that for yourself…
putinxi
But to help you make a more informed decision, my next entry will be on Russia’s complicity with the Rockefeller NWO.




Mainstream globalist propaganda reveals East/West conflict is a farce (Update 1)

For anyone who might still believe that the US/NATO versus Russia/BRICS geopolitical confrontation is real
here is a little blast from the past
ecocover
…It is the cover from the January 9, 1988 issue of The Economist magazine. Note the phoenix rising from the ashes of burning national currencies, including the dollar.
The cover relates to an article on pages 9-10 titled Get ready for the phoenix, which foretold the financial drama we are now watching unfold in real time. Upon stumbling across them, I found the cover art and the article so striking that I thought they might be an online forgery, so I verified their authenticity with a research librarian at the Newspaper and Current Periodical Room of the Library of Congress. Both the cover and the article are quite real. Here are some excerpts (not necessarily in the order in which they appear in the article)…
>>> THIRTY years from now, Americans, Japanese, Europeans, and people in many other rich countries, and some relatively poor ones will probably be paying for their shopping with the same currency. Prices will be quoted not in dollars, yen or D-marks but in, let’s say, the phoenix. The phoenix will be favoured by companies and shoppers because it will be more convenient than today’s national currencies, which by then will seem a quaint cause of much disruption to economic life in the last twentieth century…
The phoenix would probably start as a cocktail of national currencies, just as the Special Drawing Right is today. In time, though, its value against national currencies would cease to matter, because people would choose it for its convenience and the stability of its purchasing power
The phoenix zone would impose tight constraints on national governments. There would be no such thing, for instance, as a national monetary policy. The world phoenix supply would be fixed by a new central bank, descended perhaps from the IMF
…Governments are far from ready to subordinate their domestic objectives to the goal of international stability. Several more big exchange-rate upsets, a few more stockmarket crashes and probably a slump or two will be needed before politicians are willing to face squarely up to that choice
Pencil in the phoenix for around 2018, and welcome it when it comes. <<<
It’s all there: the SDR “cocktail” (basket) of currencies, the IMF’s central role, and the need to create “exchange rate upsets, stockmarket crashes, and economic slumps” to make the public accept it. Seeing such an accurate forecast/blueprint, one wonders who was behind its publishing. So if we look into The Economist magazine, we find it is headquartered just a few blocks from the City of London and is owned by The Economist Group, which itself is owned by some rather interesting characters…
“The Economist Group is 50% owned by Pearson PLC via The Financial Times Limited. The bulk of the remaining shares are held by individual shareholders including the Cadbury, Rothschild, Schroder, Agnelli and other family interests as well as a number of staff and former staff shareholders.”Continue reading HERE





britnazi 


The Rockefeller Plan for the BRICS New World Order, in their own words… (Update 1 – Putin and Kissinger’s friendship)


.....Why China? Why would the Illuminati, whose home base is in Western Europe, have the Chinese front the public face of their New World Order?
A clue to their motivations and strategy can be found in this article, titled “Colonial Elite Rules China for the Illuminati.” In it, the author states…
“The Chinese people would revolt against overt foreign domination, but embrace their place in the NWO if they believed they were in control.”
The Chinese have suffered greatly at the hands of Western imperialism, as has much of the world. As a result, the Illuminati would have trouble roping many nations into a Western-led New World Order, especially the nationalistic Chinese. Since you can’t have a truly global order without the most populous nation on Earth, the Illuminati opted to use their own legacy of destruction to their advantage. Their two-part strategy to do so is as follows:
1 – They set up a China-centered alliance as an opposing force to the Western alliance.
This part of the strategy was hinted at in the mainstream press in this 2002 UPI article, titled “China Wants Its Own ‘New World Order’ To Oppose US Version.” It is common practice for the Cabal to use opposing forces to achieve their ends, and they always make sure they have influence or control over both sides.
2 – They have been driving the world public into the hands of the Chinese alliance.
How have they approached this, you ask?
> They have widely publicized a heinous New World Order planned by the Western Powers while simultaneously publicizing a benign New World Order planned by China and its allies (thus establishing danger from one side and safety from another).
> They have instigated outrageous and provocative action, both economic and military, by the Western powers (this adds a new insight into the open-for-all-to-see Wall Street / City of London criminality and recent Western military boondoggles in Afghanistan, Iraq, Egypt, Libya, and Syria).
> They have broadly exposed damaging information about Western nations, especially the US. This is the motivation behind WikiLeaks, Snowden, and a thousand smaller disclosures. And after Snowden outed the NSA’s activities to the general public, where did he run to hide? First to China (Hong Kong), then to Russia. So what is the psychological message? China and Russia (the BRICS alliance) are where you run for safety from the evil US, its Western allies, and all their horrible behavior.
It is really very simple: the Illuminati built a rabbit trap (in the BRICS alliance) that looks like a nice, safe hole to hide from danger. Now they are beating the bushes (with the Western powers) to drive the rabbits toward the trap.<<<
Clearly, the globalists took into account “the aspirations of peoples all over the globe… to emerge rapidly and conclusively from the era of colonialism” in their planning of the NWO. It is for this reason that the BRICS alliance was formed and the NWO was designed in a multipolar fashion. They want the oppressed peoples of the world to join together and see themselves beating the West. And they want them to believe that the Illuminati’s multipolar New World Order represents their final victory over oppression and ascension to equality, when it is actually just the beginning of a new phase of subjugation and their fall into equality as global serfs.
With the Rockefeller plan for the BRICS New World Order laid out before us, let’s take a look at how it was implemented.
China: Building up the False Savior
Major moves towards building the New World Order outlined in Prospect for America began in the late sixties…
1969 – The International Monetary Fund (IMF) introduces the Special Drawing Right, the planned replacement for the US dollar as the global reserve currency
IMFxxx
July 1971 – former Special Studies Project director Henry Kissinger held secret meetings in China to lay the groundwork for their introduction onto the global stage.

Continue Reading HERE