"BOUGHT": Watch online free till March 6th

Here's Your Link to Watch The BOUGHT Film *FREE – (Before It's Taken Offline March 6th!) Prepare to Discover the Insidious Truth Behind Vaccines, GMO's and Big Pharma... ~ "The BOUGHT Film will bend your reality..." ~ "The most important documentary you've ever seen..."   Are you ready to discover the shocking reality behind Vaccines, GMO's and Big Pharma? We hope so, because you deserve to! You can access your free viewing anytime, before March 6th, 2015 – at which time, it will be taken down. CLICK THIS LINK – TO WATCH THE ENTIRE BOUGHT FILM ABOUT THE BOUGHT FILM: You're about to see how Wall Street has literally "BOUGHT" your and your family's health. The food, vaccine, drug, insurance and health industry are a multi-BILLION dollar enterprise... focused more on profits than human lives. The BOUGHT documentary takes viewers deep "inside the guts" of this despicable conspiracy... Featuring exclusive interviews with the world's most acclaimed experts in research, medicine, holistic care and natural health... Bought exposes the hidden (and deadly) story behind it all. COMMENTS FROM EARLY VIEWERS: – "Thought provoking. Whichever side of these issues you're on..." – "A Conspiracy so gruesome, It'd Make HITLER Blush..." – "Your health is now brought to you by Wall Street. If you thought they hurt us with the banks, wait till you see what they're are doing to our health care..." – "CONGRESS HAS SOLD US INTO SLAVERY..." – "Every mother and father should watch and share for the well-being and safety of our children..." – "Bought does a fantastic job of raising vital questions about our food, our health and the too big role big business has in our government..." – "I wished I would have seen this movie before I had my children almost 25 years ago..." – "The corruption of our system is devastating to observe, this movie makes you want to stand up and join a revolution! " Let's do this! Jeff Hays JEFF HAYS FILMS

VACCINES: Do YOU accept full responsibility for your choice?

We need to focus the public's awareness on this massive disinformation campaign being perpetuated by Big Pharma and the medical machine and it's puppets spokesmen agencies - like the FDA and CDC- who are pushing the lies about vaccine(s) effectiveness and health risks.

The Measles outbreak in the US right now is a perfect example of this disinformation campaign. It is a war being raged on uninformed parents to convince them of the "necessity" of the Measles vaccine, and raged on informed parents who have made the choice to NOT poison their children by threatening the very security of their family.

The information and the truth about the dangers of these vaccines are well documented and even available through the main stream media.  Unfortunately, it would seem that the average North American see's these articles of children dying in Syria from the measles vaccine, people dying in Italy from the flu vaccine, girls dying in India from the Gardasil vaccine.... These horrific events have all ended with the vaccinations being STOPPED, AND THEY HAVE BEEN REPORTED ON by the media!   India BANNED the Gardasil vaccine completely because their daughters were DYING.... seriously think about the implications of this reaction.

Basically it comes down to one single question, a question that I ask EVERYONE who has vaccinated, or is thinking about vaccinating, their children and/or themselves:

Have you fully researched the vaccine you are injecting into your(childs) body?  Have you fully read the vaccine insert that outlines the ingredients of the vaccine(s) and the risks, and transparently explain what studies have and have NOT been done to prove the safety and effectiveness of the vaccine(s)?

... and 100% of the time, the response I receive is "NO"

And so I ask:  WHY have you NOT researched this?  Why have you NOT taken responsibility for your family's health and actually read the drug insert at the very least, and fully studied the ingredients IN the vaccine and their health implications? 

Response:  "Because the doctor/nurse/media have said it's safe...."

REALLY!?

Time to wake up my friends.  You are being sold a lie in order to SELL you a drug that makes the pharmaceutical companies BILLIONS of dollars.  Last month Novartis announced that it made $1.1 BILLION dollars in the last QUARTER of 2014 on their Flu vaccine alone.....

You are a human being with free will to make an informed choice.  If you do the research and make a fully informed choice TO Vaccinate, then that is your free will choice to make- in full responsibility and liability for that choice.  BUT... if you are making choices based on the biased opinions of people/organizations/corporations who have an agenda to make money from your choice.... then all responsibility for the outcome of that choice is still yours to deal with.

Making an informed choice is a basic human Right.



d



http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/vaccinated-spreading-measles-who-merck-cdc-documents-confirms

The Vaccinated Spreading Measles: WHO, Merck, CDC Documents Confirm

Friday, January 30th 2015 at 11:45 am

Written By:

Sayer Ji, Founder

20 years ago, the MMR vaccine was found to infect virtually all of its recipients with measles. The manufacturer Merck's own product warning links MMR to a potentially fatal form of brain inflammation caused by measles. Why is this evidence not being reported?
The phenomenon of measles infection spread by MMR (live measles-mumps-rubella vaccine) has been known for decades. In fact, 20 years ago, scientists working at the CDC's National Center for Infectious Diseases, funded by the WHO and the National Vaccine Program, discovered something truly disturbing about the MMR vaccine: it leads to detectable measles infection in the vast majority of those who receive it.
Published in 1995 in the Journal of Clinical Microbiology and titled, "Detection of Measles Virus RNA in Urine Specimens from Vaccine Recipients," researchers analyzed urine samples from newly MMR vaccinated 15-month-old children and young adults and reported their eye-opening results as following:

• Measles virus RNA was detected in 10 of 12 children during the 2-week sampling period.
• In some cases, measles virus RNA was detected as early as 1 day or as late as 14 days after the children were vaccinated.
• Measles virus RNA was also detected in the urine samples from all four of the young adults between 1 and 13 days after vaccination.

The authors of this study used a relatively new technology at that time, namely, reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), which they believed could help resolve growing challenges associated with measles detection in the shifting post-mass immunization epidemiological and clinical landscape. These challenges include:

• A changing clinical presentation towards 'milder' or asymptomatic measles in previously vaccinated individuals.
• A changing epidemiological distribution of measles (a shift toward children younger than 15 months, teenagers, and young adults)
• Increasing difficulty distinguishing measles-like symptoms (exanthema) caused by a range of other pathogens from those caused by measles virus.
• An increase in sporadic measles outbreaks in previously vaccinated individuals.

Twenty years later, PCR testing is widely acknowledged as highly sensitive and specific, and the only efficient way to distinguish vaccine-strain and wild-type measles infection, as their clinical presentation are indistinguishable.
Did the CDC Use PCR Testing On The Disneyland Measles Cases?
The latest measles outbreak at Disney is a perfect example of where PCR testing could be used to ascertain the true origins of the outbreak. The a priori assumption that the non-vaccinated are carriers and transmitters of a disease the vaccinated are immune to has not been scientifically validated. Since vaccine strain measles has almost entirely supplanted wild-type, communally acquired measles, it is statistically unlikely that PCR tests will reveal the media's hysterical storyline -- "non-vaxxers brought back an eradicated disease!" --  to be true. Until such studies are performed and exposed, we will never know for certain.
Laura Hayes, of Age of Autism, recently addressed this key question in her insightful article "Disney, Measles, and the Fantasyland of Vaccine Perfection":

"Has there been any laboratory confirmation of even one case of the supposed measles related to Disneyland?  If yes, was the confirmed case tested to determine whether it was wild-type measles or vaccine-strain measles?  If not, why not?  These are important questions to ask. Is it measles or not? If yes, what kind, because if it's vaccine-strain measles, then that means it is the vaccinated who are contagious and spreading measles resulting in what the media likes to label "outbreaks" to create panic (a panic more appropriately triggered by our 25 year history of epidemic autism).
It would be what one might call vaccine fallout.  People who receive live-virus vaccines, such as the MMR, can then shed that live virus, for up to many weeks and can infect others.  Other live-virus vaccines include the nasal flu vaccine, shingles vaccine, rotavirus vaccine, chicken pox vaccine, and yellow fever vaccine."

Additional Evidence That the Vaccinated Are Not Immune, Spread Disease
The National Vaccine Information Center has published an important document relevant to this topic titled "The Emerging Risks of Live Virus & Virus Vectored Vaccines: Vaccine Strain Virus Infection, Shedding & Transmission." Pages 34-36 in the section on "Measles, Mumps, Rubella Viruses and Live Attenuated Measles, Mumps, Rubella Viruses" discuss evidence that the MMR vaccine can lead to measles infection and transmission.
Cases highlighted include:

• In 2010, Eurosurveillance published a report about excretion of vaccine strain measles virus in urine and pharyngeal secretions of a Croatian child with vaccine-associated rash illness.^[1] A healthy 14-month old child was given MMR vaccine and eight days later developed macular rash and fever. Lab testing of throat and urine samples between two and four weeks after vaccination tested positive for vaccine strain measles virus. Authors of the report pointed out that when children experience a fever and rash after MMR vaccination, only molecular lab testing can determine whether the symptoms are due to vaccine strain measles virus infection. They stated: "According to WHO guidelines for measles and rubella elimination, routine discrimination between aetiologies of febrile rash disease is done by virus detection. However, in a patient recently MMR-vaccinated, only molecular techniques can differentiate between wild type measles or rubella infection or vaccine-associated disease. This case report demonstrates that excretion of Schwartz measles virus occurs in vaccinees."
• In 2012, Pediatric Child Health published a report describing a healthy 15-month old child in Canada, who developed irritability, fever, cough, conjunctivitis and rash within seven days of an MMR shot.^[2] Blood, urine and throat swab tests were positive for vaccine strain measles virus infection 12 days after vaccination. Addressing the potential for measles vaccine strain virus transmission to others, the authors stated, "While the attenuated virus can be detected in clinical specimens following immunization, it is understood that administration of the MMR vaccine to immunocompetent individuals does not carry the risk of secondary transmission to susceptible hosts.
• In 2013, Eurosurveillance published a report of vaccine strain measles occurring weeks after MMR vaccination in Canada. Authors stated, "We describe a case of measlesmumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine-associated measles illness that was positive by both PCR and IgM, five weeks after administration of the MMR vaccine." The case involved a two-year-old child, who developed runny nose, fever, cough, macular rash and conjunctivitis after vaccination and tested positive for vaccine strain measles virus infection in throat swab and blood tests.^[3] Canadian health officials authoring the report raised the question of whether there are unidentified cases of vaccine strain measles infections and the need to know more about how long measles vaccine strain shedding lasts. They concluded that the case they reported "likely represents the existence of additional, but unidentified, exceptions to the typical timeframe for measles vaccine virus shedding and illness." They added that "further investigation is needed on the upper limit of measles vaccine virus shedding based on increased sensitivity of the RT-PCR-based detection technologies and immunological factors associated with vaccine-associated measles illness and virus shedding."

Continue reading HERE

Vaccine Homework:

Vaccine inserts: 

https://www.google.com/search?q=india+stops+gardasil+vaccination+after+deaths&biw=1366&bih=603&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ei=qNHQVNTBC5GPaMrZgRA&ved=0CAgQ_AUoAw#tbm=isch&q=vaccine+inserts

http://rt.com/news/188580-syria-children-dead-vaccinations/

http://www.naturalnews.com/048391_measles_MMR_vaccines_Disneyland.html

http://www.ahrp.org/cms/content/view/805/9/

http://healthimpactnews.com/2014/supreme-court-in-india-to-rule-on-merck-fraud-regarding-hpv-vaccine-deaths/

http://www.sify.com/news/measles-vaccine-proves-fatal-for-4-infants-in-maharashtra-news-national-jegw8Vaecdfsi.html

http://blogs.wsj.com/pharmalot/2014/12/01/italy-investigates-novartis-flu-vaccine-after-12-deaths-are-reported/

http://www.vaccineriskawareness.com/Killer-Measles-Vaccine-Is-Withdrawn-And-Other-Vaccine-Death-Cases

http://www.theeventchronicle.com/study/depopulation-africa-paralyzing-vaccine-deaths-47500-50-children-recently-paralyzed-bill-gates-meningitis-vaccine/

http://www.naturalblaze.com/2015/02/the-fda-approves-new-hpv-vaccine.html

http://www.whale.to/vaccines/deaths.html

http://removingtheshackles.blogspot.com/2014/12/cdc-admits-that-flu-vaccine-does-not.html

http://removingtheshackles.blogspot.com/2013/05/vaccines-new-and-old-news.html

http://www.naturalnews.com/048467_vaccine_industry_intelligent_questions_scientific_principles.html

CDC admits that the Flu Vaccine Does NOT work.

The CDC actually admits that the Flu vaccine doesn't work.... then tries to sell you another drug to cure you when you actually get the Flu after all.

Seriously.... I can't make this crap up!!!

Love
d

No Child Left Unmedicated: the Dumbing Down of America (and Canada)

Monday, September 15, 2014

No Child Left Unmedicated: the Dumbing Down of America (and Canada)

Do you remember when "childhood" was..... childhood?  Do you  remember playing with toys, running through the neighborhood with your friends, climbing trees, using your imagination to create wonderful worlds to play in, laughing and singing and telling silly rhymes and jokes?

Children are noisy, creative, imaginative, energetic, fun loving, little people.  THAT IS CHILDHOOD.

ADHD?  Children = fun,  "hyper"= energetic, "attention deficit" = is the fact that childrens minds are mobile, creative, imaginative, active.  

No Child Left Unmedicated

14Sep, 2014by Dave Hodges

The pharmaceutical industry has completely taken over the treatment of medical and psychiatric treat,emt. Everything, and I am mean everything is geared towards getting every American on medication and keeping them on medication for the rest of their lives. There is no more vulnerable population, to this medical tyranny, than our children.

There is no greater example of this medical tyranny than the latest craze in unscientific psychiatric diagnostics than the brand new condition now being referred to as “Sluggish Cognitive Tempo” (SLT). I As a former mental health therapist, I can barely hold back my laughter at this thinly veiled attempt to separate parents from their hard earned money by making them think that the their perfectly normal child is mentally ill.

Sluggish Cognitive Tempo (lol)

This is a remarkably ridiculous name for an even more ludicrous diagnosis. The main characteristics of SLT  are vaguely described but include some combination of daydreaming, lethargy and slow mental processing, you know, like we do when we watch television.

The advocates of this diagnosis contend that SCT afflicts about two million children. And that great pharmaceutical whore, Eli Lilly, is waiting in the wings preparing to medicate the developing and highly vulnerable brains of these two million children with the latest in dangerous and mind-destroying psychotropic medications which will leave the user with a brain damaged future and a medical treatment history which will render many of these children with an uninsurable medical insurance future.

The Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology has sold its professional soul and its professional ethics to Big Pharma as it is seriously promoting this voodoo form of diagnostics. The latest issue of their publication donates a record 136 pages to the topic of SLT. And where do we find children with SLT? Probably standing next to the adults who have Restless Leg Syndrome.

The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM)-Edition IV & V

DSM is the Bible of mental illnesses. The book serves a training guide for graduate and the PhD students as well as serving as a professional guide for treatment intervention amongst mental health practitioners.

By the time a child is 21 years of age, under DSM -IV guidelines, 80% of all young adults  qualify to be diagnosed as mentally ill and, as such, are subject to being medicated.

The newest version of DSM has made this problem far worse. Normal temper tantrums have been turned into a diagnosable and pharmacologically treatable illness called ‘Disruptive Mood Dysregulation Disorder”. Normal adolescent rebellion is now being labeled as “Oppositional Defiant Disorder”. Normal childhood restlessness is now diagnosed as “ADHD” in children as early as two years of age.  Childhood Autism and childhood Bipolar Disorder are pharmaceutical goldmines and have increased forty fold in the last 20 years

The ADHD Scam

More than 10,000 American toddlers 2 or 3 years old are being medicated for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder outside established pediatric guidelines and professional medical practices, according to data recently presented by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention....

Continue reading HERE

Patricia Albright: Marijuana Advocate Caught between State, Federal Law

Our friend Tricia Albright is still fighting the US federal "government"and the court case has been moved back to July 2014.  On an even brighter note, at least the Albright's court case is now getting main stream media attention!!!

I've highlighted the parts of this article that people need to be aware of.  This isn't just about one mom and her son facing criminal prosecution for trying to help people, this is about the greater threat of a Federal Court stomping on Rights, and even worse, making up their own rules as they go along.

.... Since when does a State of California Licensed medical marijuana grower deserve to be put in prison for 20 years, when the average rapist, pedophile, or murder serves less than a quarter of that time in prison? 

In January I published an article with a link to the Change.org petition to try and help Patricia and her son.  I just checked the petition and it has only 1100 signatures on it!!!!  SERIOUSLY?!?!  I know for a fact that over 2500 people read that article on my site alone.

Please, if you haven't signed the petition, if you haven't shared this story on your facebook page, or google+, or twitter, or your forums or skype rooms or chat hang outs..... PLEASE DO!!!!


OH and ps: the "Feds" are lying about money laundering charges and about profits.... they are making up lies to try to uphold their own decisions to prosecute an innocent woman and her son who've been working and saving lives of people for years.......  perhaps people should take a little peep into the ties between The Cancer Association and Big Pharma and the lobbyists and who is paying off whom to get certain laws passed and who is paying of whom to make certain decisions in the courtroom.


Did you know that the US "Government" owns all the patents to medical marijuana? 




http://fox40.com/2014/02/12/marijuana-advocate-caught-between-state-federal-law/#KloCLL0UIzwh0deq.01

Marijuana Advocate Caught between State, Federal Law

PLACER COUNTY-
It was just days after California voters passed Prop 215 in 1996, California’s top cop Dan Lungren at the time said the state would face an uphill battle dealing with the legalization of the drug.

Since then, many changes have taken place – and not just in California. Medical marijuana is legal in 19 other states, and Washington, D.C. That list includes Colorado and Washington, with both legalizing marijuana for recreational use.
Still, that hasn’t stopped the Feds from busting up medical marijuana grows and dispensaries, because it’s still illegal under federal law.

“I’m 62. I’d be 82 years old,” Patricia Albright said of the time she’s facing in prison. She’s being indicted on charges of trafficking, growing and manufacturing marijuana.


Albright says in 2010, the DEA raided her marijuana grow. She maintains that she did everything legal according to the state. Albright’s son, Jordan Wirtz, is being indicted too.

It all started in the mid-80s, when Albright says her son Trevor was battling bone cancer.

“There was a time where he was screaming for help he was in so much pain,” Albright said.

Trevor lost both eyes and was always in excruciating pain until one day, when a doctor told Albright about a form of alternative medicine.

“She said I should make him pot butter,” Albright told FOX40.

Albright says marijuana butter made a difference, but her son died at age eight. However, from that point on, she started to believe in the healing powers of cannabis.

Now, Albright faces serious charges.

“Growing marijuana, manufacturing marijuana, committing a felony while armed with a gun and structuring, which I did not do.”

If Patricia Albright is telling the truth and she did follow state laws, how is it possible the federal government can pursue a case against her?

“Let me be clear about this right now, there are no medical marijuana cards. Marijuana is illegal according to the federal government,” FOX40 Legal Analyst Ken Rosenfeld said.

Meaning the federal government has the final say, trumping state laws.

The DEA can come in at anytime and bust up what’s considered to be a legal business in certain states.

Albright sent the Obama Administration a letter. In it she says, “I am writing this to see if you or Attorney General Eric Holder can find it in your heart to help us. I believe in you…we are not criminals…”

The letter also mentions that Albright is losing her home

“What are they really after? I’m not a hardened criminal they know that,” she said.

FOX40 contact the Feds about this case, but they wouldn’t comment. However, court documents reveal an undercover DEA agent made contact with Albright and her son, and they informed them that they ship drugs to Colorado.
Agents also say they found evidence that proved Albright was trying to launder the profits she made from selling marijuana.
Patricia Albright insists that she and her son are innocent. They’re due in court July 28.

Read more: http://fox40.com/2014/02/12/marijuana-advocate-caught-between-state-federal-law/#ixzz2tHUqRZ27

Hemp Could Free Us From Oil, Prevent Deforestation, Cure Cancer and It’s Environmentally Friendly ....

So WHY is it illegal?  See the statement in the Title of the article- THAT is why it's illegal!
Did you know that the US first President George Washington grew Hemp?  I told a good friend of mine a few weeks ago to convert his farm to hemp and serve the local sheriffs and government with a notice that he's just following in the footsteps of the founding father of America... and of course to show him the proof that Hemp farming is illegal.

Thanx for posting this E!

http://www.ascensionwithearth.com/2013/05/hemp-could-free-us-from-oil-prevent.html#more

Hemp Could Free Us From Oil, Prevent Deforestation, Cure Cancer and It’s Environmentally Friendly – So Why Is It Illegal?

Marco Torres, Prevent Disease- Waking Times
 
Hemp is a tall, beautiful and gracious looking annual plant that can reach heights over twelve feet. Although hemp (cannabis sativa) and marijuana (cannabis sativa var. indica) come from a similar species of plant, they are very different and confusion has been caused by deliberate misinformation with far reaching effects on socioeconomics as well as on environmental matters. The reason hemp is illegal is not because of any negative impact to the environment or human health, but exactly the opposite. It is so environmentally friendly, nutritionally and medicinally beneficial, that it provides too many abundant resources which would make it impossible for powerful corporations to compete.

Historical Use 

Hemp is the most universally useful plant we have at our disposal. The history of mankind’s use of hemp can be traced way back in time to between about 5000 – 7000 BC. Remains of seed husks have been found at Neolithic burial sites in central Europe, which indicate that they were used in funeral rites and shamanic ceremonies. It is probable that at that time the distinctions between various strains were not as pronounced as they are today.


Up until and even during WWII, hemp was a widely grown crop, which provided the world with an excellent and most durable source of fibre. Since it is an annual with a growing cycle of only 120 days it can be harvested several times a year, depending on local weather conditions. Its biomass is considerable, which means that it absorbs large quantities of the greenhouse gas CO2. It is resistant to bugs and requires little agrochemical treatment. It is extremely undemanding and can be grown in very poor conditions and depleted soils and will actually improve the soil structure over a period of years. For many centuries hemp was one of the most important industrial crops which provided the fibres for rope and tough, durable canvass without which the age of exploration could never have set sail.

In the US too, there have long been numerous rules and regulation in place regarding the cultivation of hemp. But unlike today’s regulations that strongly prohibit any cultivation of hemp, less than a century ago hemp cultivation was not just encouraged, but mandatory, with hefty fines being levied against farmers who refused. ‘Hemp for Victory’ was the government coined slogan that fuelled the last big bout of legal hemp cultivation during WWII, promoting hemp cultivation as a patriotic cause.

Deliberate Misinformation About THC 

Hemp is a variety of cannabis sativa that has a long history of use in the United States. However, since the 1950s it has been lumped into the same category of marijuana, and thus the extremely versatile crop was doomed in the United States. Hemp is technically from the same species of plant that psychoactive marijuana comes from. However, it is from a different variety, or subspecies that contains many important differences.

Industrial hemp has very low Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) levels, which is the principal psychoactive constituent. Compared to marijuana which is specifically cultivated for personal psychoactive use, it is nearly impossible to “get high” on hemp. Marijuana that can be smoked usually contains between 5-10%t THC, industrial hemp contains about one-tenth of that. In order to get a psychoactive effect, one would need to smoke more than a dozen hemp cigarettes over a very short period of time to achieve any kind of psychoactive effect. The reason for the low THC content in hemp is that most THC is formed in resin glands on the buds and flowers of the female cannabis plant. Industrial hemp is not cultivated to produce buds, and therefore lacks the primary component that forms the marijuana high. Furthermore, industrial hemp has higher concentrations of a chemical called Cannabidiol (CBD) that has a negative effect on THC and lessens its psychoactive effects when smoked in conjunction.

Industrial hemp also grows differently than THC-containing cannabis. Hemp is typically grown up, not out, because the focus is not on producing buds but on producing length of stalk. In this way, hemp is a very similar crop to bamboo. The stalk contains the fiber and hard, woody core material that can be used for a variety of purposes, even carpentry.

The two also differ in the areas that they can be effectively grown. THC-producing Marijuana must be grown in generally warm and humid environments in order to produce the desired quantity and quality of THC-containing buds. However, since industrial hemp does not contain these buds, and the hardy parts of the plant are the more desired, it can be grown in a wider range of areas. Generally, industrial hemp grows best on fields that provide high yields for corn crops, which includes most of the Southwest, Southeast, and Northeast United States. Furthermore, since industrial hemp can use male plants as well as female plants (since the object is not THC production), higher crop yields can result.

While there is virtually no THC in the varieties grown for industrial uses such as oil and fibre, governments have cooperated with powerful corporate lobbyists the ensure that hemp is lumped into the same category as marijuana. The primary reason is that hemp has too many abundant resources for fuel, housing, food, medicine that corporations cannot exploit. Think about how many polluting conglomerates would go down if hemp was permitted as a resource. The oil, pharmaceutical, supplement and constructions industry would need to radically shift their business model to survive.

Abundant Resources 

Hemp provides the fibre to make a durable paper – a far more sensible solution than the wasteful method of clear cutting old growth forests, or even the cultivation pine plantations that are ecologically speaking dead zones that take 20 years to mature before they can be harvested. Cannabis produces 4 times more fibre per acre and can be harvested several times per year. The first dollar bills were printed on hemp paper, your old family bible is probably printed on hemp paper and even the constitution itself was drafted on hemp paper.

Hemp has the strongest natural fibres, which can be used not just to produce rough cloth, such as sails or canvass, but also durable work clothes, like the original jeans. When the plants are grown closer together the fibre becomes shorter and finer, which allows for finer textiles. Today, there are some fashion designers that are experimenting with a wide range of textiles made from hemp for their stylish, trendy hemp lines, shirts, suits, bags, jeans and more. And, no- you can’t smoke them to get high!

Hemp fibres are also finding application as a modern building material, an application that has been spearheaded and exploited successfully in France. Hemp fibres can be blended with water and limestone to create an extremely tough, light-weight, natural cement that has not only excellent insulating properties, but also shows more flexibility than conventional concrete, which makes it particularly useful as a building material in earthquake prone areas.

Back in 1941, Henry Ford built a car that was not only entirely built from ‘hemp plastic’, but also ran on hemp fuel. Hemp oil, pressed from the seeds is also extremely versatile. It can be polymerized to create a solid plastic-like material, which is extremely durable, yet nevertheless is completely natural and biodegradable, which could replace plastics in numerous industrial processes.

Car manufacturers are again turning to hemp as a resource to provide light-weight, yet shock absorbent and environmentally friendly material for their cars. Due to the high biomass hemp would also make an ideal source of ethanol, the best bio-fuel alternative to gasoline, which is capable of fuelling engines without producing all those evil gases that are destroying our atmosphere and poisoning the air. At long last, some of the top car manufacturers are beginning to follow in Ford’s steps.
Some Facts on Hemp 

• Farming 6% of the continental U.S. acreage with biomass crops would provide all of America’s energy needs.
• Hemp is Earth’s number-one biomass resource; it is capable of producing 10 tons per acre in four months.
• Biomass can be converted to methane, methanol, or gasoline at a cost comparable to petroleum, and hemp is much better for the environment. Pyrolysis (charcoalizing), or biochemical composting are two methods of turning hemp into fuel.
• Hemp can produce 10 times more methanol than corn.
• Hemp fuel burns clean. Petroleum causes acid rain due to sulfur pollution.
• The use of hemp fuel does not contribute to global warming.

Hemp oil is of a very high quality and industry is using it in paints, inks and varnishes. In recent years the food industry is also discovering its virtues. Hempseed oil is one of the richest sources of essential amino acids and essential fatty acids, providing an excellent balance between omega-3, -6 and -9 fatty acids. All of these substances are currently being discussed, not only in the alternative health scene, but also by the food industry, which is searching for suitable ingredients to create so called ‘functional foods’. Essential fatty acids are extremely important to the proper functioning of cells. They play a role in reducing bad cholesterol and plaque, which is responsible for arteriosclerosis. Healthfood companies are beginning to experiment with hemp as a basis for a large range of products- from hemp seed bars, to gummi bears, to beer, to hemp cheese and many more.

Studies have been released that show people suffering from cancer have low levels of melatonin in their bodies. Also studies have shown that just smoking hemp can raise the melatonin levels in our bodies. So one can only imagine what hemp oil that is in a concentrated state can do to increase melatonin levels. Hemp oil promotes full body healing and raises melatonin levels thousands of times higher than normal. When the pineal gland produces vast amounts of melatonin, it causes no harm to the body but it is very hard on the condition you are suffering from and indeed can eliminate it. For almost a decade, Rick Simpson has been showing people how to cure cancer with hemp oil.
Both the commercial legal type of hemp oil and the illegal THC laden hemp oil are one of the most power-packed protein sources available in the plant kingdom. Its oil can be used in many nutritional and transdermal applications. In other chapters in my Winning the War on Cancer book we will discuss in-depth about GLA and cancer and also the interesting work of Dr. Johanna Budwig. She uses flax seed oil instead of hemp oil to cure cancer — through effecting changes in cell walls — using these omega3 and omega6 laden medicinal oils.

Hemp Oil Uses 

Every application that uses petroleum for it’s skin and hair products can use hemp oil as it is more beneficial and herbal. It can be used in many health issues as either a pain reducer or even as the cure for it.

• Since hemp oil is natural, it is used as a moisturizing oil which can be applied after a shower or a bath. When you massage your body with it, it nourishes the skin and increases the blood circulation. More on facial skin care. 
• Hemp oil is used in cooking as well, though it is not suitable for high heat cooking. Along with giving a slightly nutty and crispy taste to food, it can be the perfect salad oil just in case you’re out of olive oil.
• Another application of hemp oil is it’s use as biodiesel in the same manner like other vegetable oils. It is a safe replacement for petroleum as it is non-toxic and doesn’t harm the environment.
• Almost all the forms of plastics can be made by using hemp oil instead of using petroleum as a base. As those made from petroleum, release harmful chemicals while decomposition, but those from hemp oil, don’t.
• Hemp oil can also be used in the production of paints as it doesn’t cause any armful releases when washed down from the drain and has very low emissions than the petroleum paints which are currently being used.
• Hemp oil prevents skin disorders like psoriasis, eczema, acne and dry skin. It is highly nutritious for the skin and makes a wonderful addition to homemade moisturizing blends and rejuvenating creams. (Read Andrew Weil’s article on hemp oil http://www.ratical.org/renewables/TherapHoil.html)

The list of beneficial uses of hemp goes on and on.

So why is non-psychoactive Hemp illegal?

There is an old saying: if you want to get to the root of a problem, follow the money. This holds true for hemp. In this case we have to ask the question ‘who benefits from hemp being illegal?’ The logical answer is: the oil companies- and their share holders, of course. Hemp became illegalized at the time when oil was beginning to make an impact on the economy as a base material for many things that hemp could also be used for, including textiles and fibres (plastics), cosmetics and fuel. Obviously, a resource is more profitable if access to it is restricted and not every farmer can grow it himself. In an exceedingly clever PR move psychoactive marijuana and hemp have been ‘thrown in the same pot’ as it were, and a massive campaign has been launched to convince people of the dangers of marijuana alias hemp – a highly questionable assertion.

Although technically hemp is not illegal to grow in some states, it requires obtaining a special permit from the drug enforcement agency (DEA) to restrict mass production. These permits are rarely given out and require that the crop be surrounded by security measures such as fences, razor wire, security guards, or dogs. For a crop that has little-to-no potential to get people high, the current attitude is both irresponsible and draconian.

Hemp is the most useful plant ally we have – a sustainable resource par excellence, as some might like to call it. Instead of cursing it we should be grateful to its deva and use all its ample gifts to turn the ecological demise of our planet around.

It is not hard to see how immensely valuable hemp is and how it has the potential of solving many of our environmental problems, not to mention our health problems. Yet, we are continuously deprived of its benefits because farmers are prohibited from cultivating this crop. Obviously importing it or products made from it is very expensive and the high expense is a prohibitive factor to choosing hemp as an environmentally friendly alternative even where it is available. It makes no sense to import a crop like hemp, when it can be, should be and used to be grown in all temperate and hot regions of the world.

Industrial hemp could transform the economy of the world States in a positive and beneficial way, and therefore should be exploited to its full potential.

About the Author

Marco Torres is a research specialist, writer and consumer advocate for healthy lifestyles. He holds degrees in Public Health and Environmental Science and is a professional speaker on topics such as disease prevention, environmental toxins and health policy. 


http://www.wakingtimes.com/2013/05/14/hemp-could-free-us-from-oil-prevent-deforestation-cure-cancer-and-its-environmentally-friendly-so-why-is-it-illegal/

The Story of Trisha Albright: when healers are targeted

I want to tell you the story of Trisha Albright- an amazing woman who has been using medical marijuana to help so many people in California with AIDs, Cancer and other painful and/or terminal sicknesses.  Trisha is fully licenced by the State of California to grow marijuana and to process it into butter and tinctures and oils to provide pain relief and natural healing to sick people..... but the Federal government decided that they don't have to recognize that licence and are throwing the book at her to the extreme- trying to imprison her for 20 years...... for helping people.

....I'm not even going to comment on the fact that murderers have gotten less time, and that paedophile rapists are usually free in less than 4 years....

Below is the article in the US Observer that outlines the ridiculous charges against Trisha and her son from March 13th 2013, and a link to their original article from April 2012.


Trish's Case is yet another nail in the coffin of the Corporate Government and it's blatant lies and deceit against the People.  Trish was helping people with a known, studied and well confirmed and verified alternative medical therapy, and that made Big Pharma angry and made the Government Corporation angry.  So they threw a tantrum and went after her in a circus of court proceedings that if it wasn't for the fact that Trisha and her son are standing in the middle of this mess, it would be hysterically funny.

By the way, did you know that the US Government/corporation owns all the patents on medical cannabis cures and treatments?

.... well geeeee!  Why would they go after a woman for legally producing medical cannabis cures and treatments when they Know that Cannibis cures so many things?  Might it be that they don't want people to be healed and helped? hmmmmmmm

They are holding the contrast so brightly that it's illuminating the disclosure of corruption of the corporation.

...... of course, I'd rather illuminate them with a bonfire, but that's just me being grumpy.

I've been told that a facebook page is being set up to support Trisha and her son and to share incoming information and updates.  As soon as I have that info, I will publish it here on RTS.  I have three friends using cannabis oil to treat their cancer..... this trial against Trisha outrages me.

I have another friend being brought up on charge by the medical madmen because she's healing people, and another friend who has been harassed to the extreme also for healing people. I have witnessed midwives being brought up on murder charges because they chose to give grieving parents peace and dignity of having their sleeping baby born at home.  Midwives imprisoned because they refused to register with the provincial governments because they recognized the push of the medical associations to force midwives to medicalize birth they way they do.

BUT...... I content myself with the knowledge that this is all about to come to a screeching halt very very very VERY  soon.

Until that moment though, I will do whatever I can to fight these injustices of a system so corrupt that they would throw away a human life before allowing a single dollar to slip through their fingers.






Patricia Albright’s Malicious Medicinal Marijuana Prosecution –
States Rights vs Federal Rights and Individual Rights vs Police State Actions   Share This Article

Update 
By Edward Snook
Investigative Reporter
Eastern District of California - As you read this release, realize it is a fact that California passed Proposition 215 in 1996, which makes it legal for Patricia Albright to grow medicinal marijuana after she obtains a prescription – she did this. Further, the State of California passed SB420 in 2003, which prompts growers to grow medicinal marijuana and makes it legal for growers to sell their “overages” to dispensaries and other prescription holders.
Using a strict and factual interpretation of the United States Constitution, federal prosecutors have absolutely no jurisdiction to prosecute Patricia Albright or her son even though they have usurped the right. The prosecution of Albright and others like her is wasting billions of hard earned tax dollars each year. And, Albright’s prosecution is just plain wrong, ethically and morally.

What was Patricia Albright doing with her marijuana?

Patricia Albright's deceased son - Trevor

As I wrote in our previous press release, Patricia Albright’s use of marijuana started with her 8 year-old, deathly ill son Trevor. She used marijuana to treat Trevor due to the prompting of an oncologist, in order to alleviate Trevor’s pain and improve his quality of life. Trevor had terminal cancer – Trevor tragically died… The US Attorney’s Office should look long and hard at this picture of young Trevor – and then ask themselves, what if this was my child?
Patricia made butters for baked goods, oils and tinctures for people with Hepatitis C, on dialysis, AIDS, high blood pressure and cancer. We do not want to reveal the names of these individuals as we do not want to draw a road map for the federal government to wrongfully harass and possibly arrest them.
It takes many pounds of medicinal marijuana to make butter, oil and tinctures. So, when prosecutors talk of “pounds” and “great numbers of plants,” it is important to realize that this is being done for the sole purpose of exaggerating the circumstances, simply to make Patricia Albright look bad when she is in front of her jury.
Patricia never charged for these things, she called it "part of her ministry". Two of the following three people who used marijuana grown at Patricia’s farm were part of her “collective” of growers and had their prescriptions posted, as did Patricia, on the gate at the entrance to her farm and they all believed they were acting legally according to California State law.
One person who received substantial pain relief from the marijuana that Patricia grew has had a massive stroke and is riddled with cancer – unfortunately, due to Patricia’s false prosecution he no longer has access to her organic medicine, which could alleviate much of his pain and discomfort.
Two other individuals who used marijuana grown at Patricia’s farm for pain relief have now died - one of aids and the other of bone cancer. Both of these individuals made substantial claims regarding the pain relief the marijuana provided. I should note that we are looking into numerous other instances where Patricia Albright helped extremely ill people who possessed prescriptions for marijuana, cope with their pain through the use of medicinal marijuana.

Who is responsible for this miscarriage of justice?

Patricia and son Jordan

Patricia’s Federal Public Defender Matthew Scoble of Sacramento, CA was recently provided cooperating witness Jacob “Jake” Donahue’s statement against Patricia and her son Jordan Wirtz. According to Albright, “my attorney Matt was working with prosecutor Michael Beckwith to postpone our trial in order to give Matt enough time to investigate Donahue’s statement, which was full of lies and very damning to us.”
Albright continued, “When we met with Matt and after I told him about the US~Observer article he became very agitated over the fact that I would speak to the US~Observer and that they had published. He told me it could cause the judge to give me additional time on my sentence and he told me that I had better hope that the judge doesn’t see the article. He then stated that the judge would look at my statements to the Observer as witness tampering. He went on to tell me not to talk with the Observer or any press again.”
Here you have it folks! Patricia Albright has not had a trial yet, virtually no investigation of her case has been conducted by her public defender, she has been under strict supervision since her arrest (which actually equates to serving a sentence), her public defender is attempting to restrain her absolute 1st Amendment rights and her conviction and actual sentencing is already a foregone conclusion to her own attorney. What justice – what freedom…
Back on track - Matthew Scoble reportedly had a call from Assistant United States Attorney (AUSA) Mike Beckwith while Albright was at his office wherein Beckwith began recanting on his tentative agreement to continue the trial. According to Albright, “later that same day Scoble informed me that Beckwith told him that he would not agree to continue and that he was going to pursue other tactics, which could only be interpreted as vindictive. Scoble stated that Beckwith probably didn’t want the continuance because he was trying to cover his “butt” with his boss (US Attorney Wagner) for waiting to give Scoble crucial discovery until just days before trial, leaving them no time to investigate the discovery. AUSA Beckwith had possessed the discoverable material for well over two years.
I thought that defense attorneys were supposed to vigorously defend their client throughout the case, not merely during the three weeks prior to trial. It is very alarming that her attorney would reportedly tell her, you have no case, when responding to her question as to why she was in his office on March 18, 2013. How can Scoble explain why he is reportedly going on vacation the week prior to her scheduled April 2, 2013 trial? Patricia’s own attorney is slowly becoming responsible, in part, for her false prosecution.
Patricia has already informed us that Scoble told her to pack up her home and get ready to go to prison. According to Albright, she doesn’t have any defense because Federal Judge Garland E. Burrell Jr. has stated that he won’t allow a “medicinal marijuana” or “legal according to California State law defense.” This is pure insanity! Even people charged with federal tax evasion are afforded the “good faith belief” defense of believing they weren’t required to pay the federal income tax. And there are no state laws making tax evasion legal, whereas California State law makes Patricia’s medicinal marijuana grow perfectly legal. If this is indeed Judge Burrell’s position, he will be responsible in great part for her false prosecution.
AUSA Michael M. Beckwith is responsible for the false prosecution of Patricia Albright. If Beckwith has acted coercively, like Patricia’s account of what her attorney has stated to her implies, then he is a great danger to freedom and the principles that once made America a great nation. His attempted false prosecution of this innocent American will permanently hang around his neck like an albatross… Beckwith is the main person at this juncture responsible for Patricia Albright’s attempted false prosecution.

U.S. Attorney Benjamin B. Wagner

United States Attorney for the Eastern District of California Benjamin B. Wagner, in the end, will share the greatest responsibility for the Albright false prosecution, should he allow it to continue. If Mr. Wagner looks closely at the facts of this case he will easily see that a single lady possessing a shot gun and a revolver out in the wilderness have nothing whatsoever to do with growing a medicinal marijuana crop. If he takes the time to look into this case, all he will have to do to understand the false structuring charge that is tied to the medicinal marijuana charges, is to ask Patricia Albright for her explanation as I have done. He will then dismiss this case in the interest of justice.
The greatest responsibility for this absolute travesty of justice is President Barack Obama, his Justice Department and the United States Congress. President Obama is the one who instructed his “Justice Department” in 2009, to announce to the public that the feds would not be going after medical marijuana growers who were following state law. This public announcement was actually nothing more or less than “entrapment” in many cases.
It is Congress that makes unconstitutional laws. It is Congress who empowers the federal police state to trample state rights and totally violate the 10th Amendment.
In closing and out of fairness, it is possible that US Attorney Benjamin Wagner doesn’t know all the facts of the Albright case. Unlike his AUSA Beckwith, who has had the time and ability to properly investigate the facts, Wagner now has the opportunity to investigate and then right this wrong – he is informed… I want to stress that it will take men like US Attorney Benjamin Wagner to stop the insanity that is going on within our justice system.
I do not smoke marijuana and I’m certain that none of our investigators use it for medicinal purposes or for any other reason. However, I believe in freedom and I absolutely hate hypocrisy. While our federal government continually talks about deficits and money shortages, they continue to waste countless tax dollars on victimless crimes. They continue to spend billions upon billions to prosecute and jail exceptional people like Patricia Albright and it is time that all Americans start screaming for them to stop, before our nation is completely bankrupt, both financially and morally.

I just received the following email from Patricia Albright:

“My attorney just called me to tell me that he has read the US~Observer article a number of times and he has decided that he is going to file a motion to remove himself from my case because he doesn't appreciate his name being dragged through the mud. He says he hasn't heard anything from the judge on his motion to continue my trial. He also stated that I'd better hope that the judge has not yet read the article because when he does I am going to be very sorry.”

Is Scoble implying that Judge Burrell is prejudiced and vindictive? Is he implying that the judge is unconcerned with Patricia Albright’s Constitutional rights? I would think better of Judge Burrell – I am very skeptical when someone speaks for another, especially when that someone is a public defender who has doing nothing to prepare or better yet, fight for a defense for his client…
As we prepare to release this Alert, I have been informed that Judge Burrell has just granted the motion for Matthew Scoble to withdraw as Patricia’s public defender. The judge has set a status conference for Friday March 22, 2013 at 9:00 a.m. Scoble informed Ms. Albright that she will receive another attorney at that time.
Even though I have been dealing with false prosecutions for over 30 years, 22 years publishing the Observer, I have never witnessed a more tragic case than this. To read the previous article, click here.

Keshe: Free energy, amazing medical advancements, space flight.... and that's just the beginning

More information about the Keshe Foundation.  Watch & Read, then ask yourself this:  is THIS one of the reasons that the US is so determined to destroy Iran? 

- Free energy means no more relying on Oil, Coal, and Nuclear power- means no more huge lobbying to the government, no more huge payoffs, no more excuses for massive environmental damage.... no more money and power to the cabal that controls the energy industry.

- Medical Advancements that will put an end to Big Pharma's monopoly on our "health"- no more huge lobbying to the government, no more huge payoffs, no more excuses for massive health damage caused by their drugs .... no more money and power to the cabal that controls the health industry.

I'm not even going to get into the topic of space travel and the military aspect of Keshe's inventions.

Iran is not the enemy.  The CABAL is the enemy.

Click HERE for Part One

Click HERE for the original report

Part II: Was US Spy Drone Captured by Iranian Flying Saucer?

Sterling Allan, the founder of PESN, had the opportunity to conduct an hour and a half long interview with Mehran Keshe, the individual who claims to have given Iran the advanced space technology that enabled them to capture a US spy drone.
Click here for a report of the interview.

| Stream | Download 90 min ~32 Mb Interview > Listen On December 14, Sterling Allan conducted an interview with M.T. Keshe as part of the Free Energy Now series.

The US spy drone captured by the Iranians. Credit: AFP. See also Video from Iran news.

Transcription

Here's a transcription by Hank Mills of the first portion of the interview. It was hard to transcribe due to the accent differences as well as an intermittent Skype connection.
K. Hello?

S. Hello. This is Sterling Allan, how are you doing?

K. Who is speaking?

S. Sterling Allan from PES Network.

K. How are you?

S. Good.

K. We are doing a story in our news about the Drone that was captured in Iran, and the post you put recently on your forum. And I just wanted to get some additional clarification if I could. Do you have a couple minutes?

K. OK. No problem.

S. If I understand correctly, the technology that you say Iranians used to capture that technology, originated with you and your lab, is that correct?

K. Ahhh... you know I told you before that we have transferred our knowledge of space technology to Iran. And at the same time I explained in the forum and in the interviews in the past two years that when these systems are used they block the radar system, and the mass or the size is irrelevant. So, these systems have a total jamming capability to jam radar or any other thing. So, this is exactly what we have been saying for the past two years. This is the capability of space technology. And now you see the results. There is no damage to the craft. There is nothing, just two wings. One of the wings on the left and the right side is cracked, the whole thing is fully intact. Don't forget that the craft did not go for emergency landing, it was picked up and put down. Because if it was an emergency landing or if it had landed without any wheels you would have seen... it would have been crushed all together. So at the height at which it has been picked up and it is still intact, it is untouchable. It is exactly what we described what would happen and now you see the practicality of the use.

S. Is this technology you are talking about making it available to all nations to help eliminate war, is it a technology that could conceivably be used aggressively.....

K. When everyone has it, they can't use it aggressively any more. This is what I have been warning and what I have been telling for past two, three years. This is a new development in space technology. A craft like this cannot be brought down especially at high speed. With a full remote control with two or three satellites locked onto it. What do you call it, being able to land it and take control and land it on it's own the only time we know.... And in the interview I gave to Kim, about six to eight months ago, I said this will be happening, you see this happening now.

S. In this scenario with the drone for example, was it a scenario of the space craft going and intercepting, picking up, and then...

K. I put the knowledge on my forum. It is a pick up and landing. A pick up and drop. You can block, you can cover the space environment, and you take control literally the craft has no more control and no line of communication out side it. We showed the system physically and the weight reduction of three years ago the system..... On the third of December in Belgium in a presentation in front of a hundred and thirty or a hundred and forty people. So we already have shown the physical system in public for the first time this year. And next year we will show a more powerful system.

S. I knew somebody who was going to attend that but thought it had been canceled.

K. Pardon?

S. I know somebody that was going to attend that demonstration in Belgium but thought it was canceled.

K. No, it was not canceled. It was done by Belford group. We did not show the system in Eidhoven. A lot of people... I'll put it on my forum that the gravitational system will not be shown in Eidhoven. A lot of people thought, came thinking they would see a UFO. I said we would not show the technology there because we had to cross borders with nuclear materials, and we could not do so. In Belgium in the restriction I work, I can show what I have. I showed it the following Saturday in a presentation. It was a full packed room. They could not get any more people. They could not get any more chairs into the hall. We asked everybody to put all their mobiles or their cameras or whatever they had, laptops, into a black bag in front of them. That nobody could take pictures, and then when we were sure there were no pictures taken, for an hour and a half we showed the videos. We showed the three kilowatt generator system, and we showed the Oasis system, and we showed the full.... what do you call it.... the gravitational system. And people who they came they looked at it they stood around they watched it. It is the first time we opened it in public and two weeks later you see the American system go down.

S. Ok. What is the present status in terms of the prognosis for bringing an energy technology to the marketplace?

K. We are selling a lot... by the end of next year, within the next twelve months we start delivering the units which we received orders for to the people who paid the deposit. They will be informed to pick it up. And we are literally commercializing next year. We are now short. We showed the physical system with it's stand and it's frame work in the presentation in what you call it, December. Now the new generation is going to be much much more powerful, simpler, and smaller.

S. The present one that people are paying for with delivery in the next twelve months, what is the power output and price?

K. At the moment the price is five thousand Euro, three to four kilowatt, and the price will go up to twenty thousand Euro for three to four kilowatt in the next couple of days. We wanted to put it up from the first of December, but there is so much orders coming though we will probably hold it back until the first of January at that price. And then it goes up to twenty thousand equal to what is it, three to four kilowatts at the moment. If you buy a solar system, what do you call it, when they put on the roof, at the moment in Belgium it is nineteen and a half thousand Euro for three to four kilowatt. Where you only produce energy in the daylight, this system is three to four kilowatt twenty four hours a day. And so it is very cheap for what it offers. And there is a ten kilowatt for the American market which is at the moment twenty thousand Euro, and will go up to fifty thousand Euro.

S. What is the difference between the twenty thousand Euro and the fifty thousand Euro?

K. It is the same system, but we kept the price down for introduction, and now we have met the orders we were looking for, at the same time we are opening an institute to start teaching the space technology and the medical side and everything else. So we financed it through our own system. We give you a cheap system so people get something they have never had before, they pay for it, and that pays for the institute and the university to be paid for. We are commercializing for our own benefit.

S. How many units do you expect to sell in the first six months, deliver.

K. We already have put the order out for about six months ago for ten thousand units, and that is why we are going up to a different rate now. I have been giving lectures for the past maybe eight nine months, every week once or twice around Europe. People see people know and understand the technology and we are fully booked for the next two or three months, giving lectures all over Europe. We do not have a problem. People understand it they see it they comprehend the science behind it because I teach in my presentations. People understand the basics. So they understand what it is on the medical side, we have shown such a huge, what do you call it, gains. We show the people the guy who has been paralyzed for fifteen years without being able to walk or talk for twenty years, now he has learned to cycle. We are putting some eight fifteen different videos from different people. The technology has opened up we are getting support from everywhere. The most probably we will show a new thing very soon that will go on the internet. We are going to bring this... different aspects of technology, governmental organizations, private organizations around the world. They come and they see.

S. So if somebody...

K. Energy is not our game. Energy is something there that is a byproduct of the process. But it allows us now to open the university in which we have found the premises, and it will open in the next few months.

S. If a government or industrial entity came to you to enter a commercial agreement or some kind of contract, what would they be able to see by way of demonstration?

K. We will demonstrate, we don't need anything. We commercialize everything though our own foundation. We are cash rich, we don't need people to pay us money to be part of it. We develop it we allow other people to have agency, or be part of its development. We already have came to a level. Water production. In the next six months you can buy units that produce water out of the air. So, but we do all the research. The people who come they do the commercialize or the agency work for it.

S. So what I'm asking, lets say for example someone from the United States wanted to be a distributor of this technology for the United States. What would be the process you would go through with them?

K. We don't need them. The foundation does it's own distribution. We manufacture, the clients who buys it, ordered to pick up, we tell them where and they pay for the delivery. This is how the first ten thousand units were done. We produce. We have the facility. We have places where we can produce our systems. And they just get a what you call it confirmation that their units are ready. They pick them up themselves.

S. The confirmation for the first ten thousand units is supposed to come in the next twelve months that they can pick them up?

K. Yes. Start delivering hopefully in the first half of next year. The initial units will go out. They are sealed, they cannot be tampered with. No one can break into it to see how it works. They have a locking to it. We have people wanting to buy five pieces or ten pieces, we block. Everything is capped through banking and all the ways we can check. We are not there to compete, we are there to show we can do. It is a big difference.

S. Do you, as you know everyone is looking for energy solutions. As this takes off and people start seeing products powering homes and businesses, I would imagine the demand will increase substantially. Are you in the position to be able to handle...

K. We handle back to the governments. Whatever nation comes we pack technology to the governments. Don't forget we are based and I work totally on one mission and the foundation. We give the knowledge to the nations, to the people. So if that's what I said, even in Europe we hand over the people who bought the system to the Federal governments, to the governments of the nations. Because if you sell one million units in a country of ten million or fifty million, the governments will lose their revenue from the taxation of fuel or whatever. Who is going to pay for the hospitals? Who is going to pay for cleaning the roads? Who is going to pay for the teachers? So our technology being free should not become damaging to society. People have a wrong idea about free energy. The minute you bring it out that it is going to be free, governments will tax it. We hand over the whole thing to the governments. We are not here to disturb the structure of the society. The young have to be taught and the old have to be looked after. That is part of the structure we work. People who think they will have a free energy unit and will not have to pay anything anymore....

So instead of them coming after us afterwards, we offer the nationals and the governments how much are they going to pay for the system they bought, that it can be kept and schools can be kept open, and roads can be cleaned, and the old can be looked after. This is a wrong concept. Everyone wants free energy. But in the end you have to pay for it. If you don't pay for it you need to be look after. When the government does not have the money it is the situation in Europe. Who is going to pay for the services. Who is going to pay for it to be kept. This free, have it all, even the systems are there to do, we are not the only one. There are other organizations like us who are developing technologies.

S. That is what taxation is for...

K. You pay taxes on the fuel you use. You pay taxes even on the electric cars. You plug it somewhere. You have to generate you have to produce to charge your battery up. You pay for taxes on electricity you use to charge it up. When a system like ours comes in, which you don't have any material to burn, and you tap into the universal system of energy, then you don't need to buy anything. Fueling up this system... every thirty to fifty years... but we are not paying taxes for what you are using. Who is going to pay for the taxes? Who is going to pay for the services which we like to have?

S. There are still other things you can pay taxes on. You can pay taxes on the sale of the unit, you can pay taxes...

K. That goes to the government. I think that we have discussed with some governments or officials in the past few months. There is very much a line of thinking... if it is picks up the way we think it is going to do, it is like how you pay taxes on your car. You pay taxes for consumption or the size of the engine. Like in Belgium, if you have a small engine you pay six or seven hundred. If you have a big engine you pay two or three thousand Euros per year. These units I think will be taxed on the same basis. The government will tax you on the size of the units you take. You don't need to tap into the main anymore. If you sell so much energy government can't buy your energy back, because they have enough themselves. So it comes to taxing at the point of unit per year. The people have totally wrong idea about free energy. Even the windmills, even the what you call it, solar cells... everything in time they gave the bonuses for people to get it. But in time they will be taxed for it. The structure of society in the west is that it cannot live having everything free and don't pay for it.

S. When I personally use... I run a website where we use free energy routinely. By free energy I do not mean the energy itself being free, but meaning that the energy that comes off the design.

K. If ten thousand people using little units they make or whatever, it is a different story than if you have a lot of people in the population using the system. If you go from lets say a million houses in Belgium, maybe fifty or a hundred two hundred people generate energy in a different way. But mainly the rest rely on national grid.

S. Let me finish my point please. I want to revise something you said earlier. My understanding of free energy means that the energy source that you are tapping into is free. Solar is free, the sun is free, wind is free, geothermal is free, the device is not free. Of course the device will cost money, but you are harvesting inexhaustible energy. So when we say free energy, we are saying that the fuel itself being free.

K. I am talking about both. When you have free energy. Zero energy, zero payment for fuel, then you cannot have a zero taxation on it.

S. I am just... it seems to me that one of the biggest problems right now is governments that have gotten way to big. They need to come back down to size. They have plenty of sources of taxation revenue from sales, and other things. Just because energy is gradually taken away as a revenue source, they should gradually pair down on size because they become, in my opinion government should be reduced, not increased. They are too big.

K. I don't know. Maybe you are right. But I don't know. The way I see it and the people I talk to in different levels... Their opinion is that even though you will have a free material to start or have to run your system, at the end of it your fuel is free. But you will pay for it somewhere else to your government.

S. Yeah, um. So when is, do you have another conference or presentation scheduled in the future.

K. I give a talk. My last talk of this year is this Friday, at the hall with three hundred and fifty people or seats. Then we take five weeks off, because I am finishing the book number four and five the institute. And then we start on the twenty third of January and more or less one or two lectures a week. I give a talk in Germany in the 19th of February. I give a talk in Holland with two hundred people again. It goes all the way to June, we are giving books all the time. For the past eight months we have given a public talk at least one Friday a week, sometimes two talks a week. But so this is public, and sometimes with the medical side is to a wide audience.

S. Do you have a place on your website where people can see the upcoming speeches?

K. The new website.. at the bottom of the... what you call it, first page it shows the upcoming presentations. We will come back in January, because now we have our own auditorium.

S. Is that at KesheFoundation.com?

K. Yes, Keshefoundation.com the new website which is being put up. At the bottom of the page all the presentations where and what. If there is just a name it means it is private. The people who organize it they have the people who they want to be present. Otherwise, the public ones that are announced, we usually give one or two public presentations a month. Private will usually be between thirty and fifty. The one this Friday is in a public hall.

S. I am on your website and I am not finding something for events, there is latest news articles, most read.....

K. Just scroll to the bottom, presentations. Go right to the bottom of the page, Keshe Foundation the page is blocks of squares.

S. Not in the English section, I don't see that.

K. Ok, let me get on it. Just give me two seconds. I will be there.

S. Ok, I see, presentations under articles most read.

K. Everything is there as we speak.

S. Ok.

K. We keep very well people informed about how we have been whatever, sometimes when there are a lot of these presentations they are restricted by the organizers. What they want to talk about their presentation. The presentation this Friday is about energy. The presentation in April is about medical applications. I know there are two or three more for Holland. Again, for medical only. About a hundred and fifty per presentation. I cannot do more than about a hundred and fifty people maximum.

S. Ok. Of all the people who have been involved with you what would you say is the best third party endorsement of your work? A government or third party institution?

K. What do you mean?

S. If someone wanted to get verification of your technology through a third party entity, who would you recommend they contact?

K. They contact us. We get a lot of lunatics that want verification. We verify to the people who are bona fide. People who we know. We are talking to the people can make a difference. We don't say who and where, but the people who can make the difference, they see our presentation, we demonstrate, we show them, we let them play. We have a guy who says he is a minister of the Earth and has been everywhere on the internet putting keshescum.com, and he says he is a foreign minister of the Earth. He doesn't see a thing, he is going to do this and that. We don't listen to these things. I have a program for past five years, ten years and I am doing exactly up to date.

People who want to see it, who can, that are bona fide people we show them everything. We did the same thing with the Iranian government, we did the same thing with the Belgium government. Belgian governments and offices in different shape, nano, nuclear, they have been through our technology fully. We opened all the books with them. We never disclosed, now we started disclosing who. Even one of the companies who had full access to us has been... the British government for defense. Everything, these people who talk, is the people who do not understand, who is on a different side of the fence. We have been open. I talk to officials from Belgium for four months every day with scientists and management team putting together, and they say yes, they want to make this system. We have documents we can show. The same I did with Iran, the same I did with another country. And now we are negotiating with two or three other countries for a different part of the technology. Whoever comes... we do whatever we do, and we will keep on track where we are going.

S. Earlier you mentioned on the product that is available, the three to four kilowatt system, that you are taking deposits. How much of a deposit are you taking up front?

K. We are taking five hundred Euro deposit for a five thousand Euro product. And the deposits are all kept in a secure deposit account in the bank. So it is not touched by us, it is kept safe and secure. If we don't deliver the money would be returned. So it is not that we take the money and run. Someone made a complaint, a vicious one, to the government, two governments went to the bank and saw the deposits. We are not playing games. Whatever deposits comes in straight away are banked into a deposit account for twelve months, which by the end of twelve months we don't pay, the money goes back to the people who took it, or that paid for it. All these things are, we have covered ourselves, we will not be tempted, we will not allow nothing to tempt us.

S. You already said you sold all ten thousand?

K. We have sold, we don't give figures, but believe me everyday I receive deposits, everyday we receive confirmation. We have been selling it for six months now, we put an offer out six months ago. A lot of people are buying the ten kilowatt with the two thousand Euro deposit. A lot of people are buying ten kilowatt because they said three kilowatt is not enough. Because at the moment for a three kilowatt they pay twenty thousand Euro in Europe, now they get a ten kilowatt for the same price. Put it this way, you know Ever Ready battery? Ever Ready battery is one of the big suppliers that produce windmills electricity in America, they sell for thirteen and a half thousand Euro, and fifteen thousand dollars for a windmill. So if you can have a ten kilowatts for thirty thousand dollars at the moment, you know whose buying, no one will refuse taking it.

S. And I meant to mention at the opening that I made this call through Skype, and I have my Skype setup to record the conversations. Would it be permissible for you if I made this interview available to our audience?

K. No problem. I knew you were doing it. That is why I was answering you correctly. I know how you work. I know you very well. I have had four interviews with you. I respect your integrity. We have had our ways of falling out, but you know how I am. I am very correct, I am very precise. I don't say things to please people, I do things to be correct. Why I warn, for nearly two years. You were the first one I've talked with about the Iranian space program. Now you have seen the result. You announced on 16th of March of this year, now six months later you seen it. You were the first one I even sent you the videos of the first weight reduction, two or three years ago, with private access. You know we are correct.

We are correct and that is why we don't let individuals or people with multiorganizations come in and try to tell us what to do. When I see things I do it. And because we have cash independent it means no one dictate to us what to do. We don't need people to give us money to dictate us what to do. We receive finance, we have supporters, people supported us in the background. I am thankful for them. They are getting paid for their support. Now the foundation has it's own total independence. We kept ourselves independent, and now we stay independent. No one can tell us, but we offer our technology to governments, because this is a change of faith. It is not just selling one screw, or I'm not just giving you a free energy system, it is space, it is new materials, it is medical applications, it is the system, it is the total new production of food. We are running trials on food production, so this Keshe Foundation is not doing one issue. People just focus on what they like to see. You have to look at the full spectrum of what we are doing. And thanks we received support now from several governments that are prepared to support us.

There are people who are prepared to come in because they have seen us, we don't shake and shiver. And there I as far as can be done, I teach, we put we ask from universities in Belgium, Germany, and to give us accommodation so we can start our university. They refused. Now we found we can do it somewhere else.

S. I remember something you said in an interview that we had in the past. That you said something to the effect that all of these technologies were motivated by the bottom line goal that you have of enabling astronauts to live safely in space. So that is a multifaceted task. It is not just propulsion, it is not just energy. It involved food, it involves support...

K. The one thing that we can say. Keshe Foundation is a space technology development. For the first time we have shown this we have allowed other universities to qualify our discoveries. Now we are ready complete. To be independent when we go to space. We have our own lift system and motion. We have our own energy production. Absorbing radiation in magnetic field. We produced materials in 2004 that were tested by Belgium confirming the new discovery. We have the reports of it. On the 8th of November 2011 NASA has announced a discovered a material which we discovered five years ago. They published a paper. I wrote to NASA, I said we already have this paper, this material. So we have, and they said to this material they can go for all sorts of spectrums, magnetic field absorption. We already done that five years ago. With the material we developed we can produce energy, we can produce food, we can produce light, we can produce water. So, with our space technology we are totally impendent from coming back to Earth.

Or depending now NASA is planning to go to Mars. They have to calculate everything. With this technology we developed we do not need to calculate anything. They have to calculate how many headache tablets, how much water, they have to recycle, they have to have enough water that they use when they are coming back. Now we can produce water from magnetic field environments of the universe. I will tell you something an agreement has been reached in the past hours that the first water units will be developed in the next six months for commercialization. What this means... We absorb moisture from the environment, water drops, directly for consumption.

The agreement has been made and negotiations have been going on for a few months. We will go ahead for the first commercialization in the next few months.

S. Now when you talk about extracting water from the air, I know there is a lot of companies that I've encountered over the past few years who do that through basically a condensation kind of process.

K. No no this is not condensation. This is creating magnetic field of the water the way we work, we create the magnetic gravitational of water constant. Which means you are only creating water. You only pick up the moisture of the water. With condensation if you do you have to have an air flow. You pass the airflow though the system you get water. We developed that technology with our free energy system. This is a totally different approach and departure from the old way.

S. Would you consider this a dehumidification process?

K. We take water because we did that condensation. When you do condensation from the air you get water. You get a lot of rubbish with it. Even get lead or oil on it. Because when you do condensation water pollution in the air will come with the water. This way there is no pollution attached to the water.

S. So it's drawing water and water only from the surroundings?

K. Yes. From the moisture in the air.

S. How do you do that in space where you do not have water to harvest?

K. You go to the plasma technology. That is a different approach all together. If you go on my website or if you go in the book you will see a torch that is lit. That torch absorbs all radiations from the environment, all magnetic fields from the environment, you convert that into energy and matter. We shown this physically how it is done. At the same time we even showed it in Eidhoven. During the presentation people were so crazy they did not understand it. But it is in the book and on the website. You can convert the CO2 at room temperature to solid matter that you can eat as a food, but you can add some things to it. Which we are running clinical trails. We are testing it to see how it will go.

S. Is it a form of alchemy?

K. It is not. Actually, someone sent me an email and I checked. It was very interesting, in 1925, somebody wrote a letter it's called.... to Einstein... Einstein rewrote his paper, he corrected it, he sent it back in German language to him. It was presented and then Noble Prize of 2010 went to the scientist who tried to prove what Einstein said in 1925 that gas can be changed into matter at minus 170 degrees. All we done, now we changed the gases into a solid at room temperature with a new understanding. So what we say people have won Noble Prize for it at 170 degrees, we have brought the temperature up to room temperature. We are not talking, that is why we give references. The same thing about the material I told you NASA announced and said they have a new material they call it developed a new black material which can absorb. Just go to the NASA publication of 8th of November this year. We had this material six years ago.

In a way we are very much years ahead of other people what they are trying to do. It is not alchemy. Up to now we have three state of matter, four state of matter. One was solid, liquid, and gas. Then they said plasma was the fourth state of matter. The fourth state of matter is what I call gas, gas at nano-state. Because the liquid, solid, and gas are environmentally dependent. Now that we understand the creation of reality and field of magrav. This is internal magnetic field, internal gravitational field of atom itself which dictates the structure of the atom. So you can have Co2 as a solid at minus 400 degrees and can have a solid at 1,000 or 10,000 degrees. Because we now have the understanding you can change the gravitational magnetic field of the atom, and the atom can be solid at any pressure, temperature. If you say this is crazy just think one second. Just pinch your own body. We are made of gases oxygen, nitrogen, carbon, and oxygen. The four masses. We should be a balloon. But our body in Earth's gravitational system has learned to change gases into solids, which is our body. So now for the first time we learn how our body changes matter energy into gas, and gas into solid which is our body. This is a new discovery. This is what we did not know. That is why we can sit in front of a fire, very hot, but do not disappear, do not evaporate. Because our body works on its internal gravitational magnetic field of the matter. So this is the fourth state of matter we discovered, and it is important because I can take the CO2 you breath in space, convert it to solid, and feed you with the energy you need. I do not need to carry storage, because you digestive system needs something to go inside it.


Click HERE to go to the original article