Monday, 29 October 2012

Perfect Storm, Perfect Timing

Frankenstorm just keeps tickling the back of my brain.....

The NYSE is closed today and the US securities industries have shut down all trading today:

The National Guard has been deployed to 7 states to support the local government during the Frankenstorm:

Nuclear facilities and oil refineries are bracing for impact from Sandy:

NY Mayor orders mandatory evacuation of several areas of NY:

All schools and public transit closed in several cities:

And of course we have the fact that the HAARP frequencies are off the charts:

And now this video that clearly shows chem-dumps, chem-bombs and chemtrails constantly being dropped, steering and infusing Sandy with power

You won't believe your eyes when you see what this video reveals!!! Satellite and Radar captured Infrasonic Undulation, Chemtrails enmass and ChemDUMPING!!! Multiple weather system steering and super storm creation, right before your eyes!!!
Definately HTA - HAARP Type Array infrasonic undulation. But it's not just the array we know as HAARP in Alaska. It is a miraid of TTA network arrays working in concert. Arrays can be ground based, Satellite emitters, Field antenna signal boosters, flight based, ship based, mobile or even hand held. (Depending on the civilian or military use.) There are even TTA signal echo buoys thoughout our oceans. Ionospher fortified w-chemtrail as a reflective frequency mirror.

Besides the NDAA people should be reading up on Executive Order 13603, from  March 16, 2012: National Defense Resources Preparedness:

I say it over and over again, I'm not into Fear Porn.  We have the "Perfect Storm" hitting the east coast.  We have the mainstream media DAYS AGO hyping up the expected power outages and shut down of nuclear reactors- BEFORE they even knew where it was going to hit. All public transportation in NY closed down, all businesses closed- including the Stock Exchange.  Military with their equipment all over the place.  We know that the military is crawling all over Washington DC.  The Main Stream Media has just announced that Obama has just up and left Florida to "head back to DC to monitor Hurricane Sandy".....
....Seriously?  They are flying INTO the storm?  I highly doubt that he's heading to DC.

The Perfect Storm. The Perfect Timing.

I am waiting on updates later today. I will keep you all in the loop as much as I can.


  1. Thank you for the info. I have noticed over here in California, we went from having an incredible amount of chemtrails, to ZERO in these last... probably 4 days. My feeling was that the east coast needed all they could get, and everyone headed over there to make this "epic". But my question is... what do you believe they have created this for? Due to it affecting the election, how is this good for them/what is their plan behind this? And how can we bring this around and make it the opposite of what "they" are hoping for?

  2. Looking forward to any updates from the good guys, thanks for your efforts in keeping us informed. Great research.

  3. I'm very skeptical about HAARP being used here. I've written elsewhere on this site about the hype and confusion surrounding this hurricane, which is still only a CAT1. This is from a website describing categories of hurricanes:

    "CAT1--No real damage to building structures. Damage primarily to unanchored mobile homes, shrubbery, and trees. Also, some coastal flooding and minor pier damage."

    Sound like a devastating storm?

    HAARP is used for ionospheric communications, heating the sphere and expanding it, causing changes in the jet stream. It seems possible to guide storms in this way, but a hurricane has delicate convection currents which require COLD air aloft and warm water beneath. I can't see how HAARP would not interrupt these delicate convection currents, destroying the hurricane rather than increasing its strength.

    The radio frequency readings appear to be increased communications routed throughout the eastern half of the country.

    Keep your eyes on the psychological conditioning of people "ordered" suddenly to leave their homes, growing accustomed to seeing military on the streets, and so on.

    1. yes, a Cat 1 so far- people in NY saying it's gray outside and a bit windy, that's it. Sooooo...... what if this storm has been hyped up? I mean, the Caribbean got hit with a real mess, but do we know KNOW that it's as strong still? Or has it been hyped up to this level for a purpose? As I said: they started the Hype about power outages and nuclear facilities being in danger on Thursday, before they even really knew where it was going to hit..... So why hype something like this up to this extent? Maybe the storm will be as bad as they say, maybe not. Or is it a cover for something else happening?

      and oh yes, HAARP has the power to drive storms. Especially when it's combined with chemicals released in aerosol form.

    2. I think what you are thinking RTS. It has to be a cover for something else going on behind the scenes. Something like the ''October surprise'' has about two days left to make it's debut as something to look forward too to usher in something else. I mean it seems that Hurricane Sandy is going to be directly on top of DC and for Obama to head back is so conflicting to common sense as what to do when other people are trying to evacuate that same area and the surrounding areas in that same vicinity. Those HAARP readings are not matching the conditions of the storms as it currently stands, and for Obama to say that the election would take care of it self and is nothing to worry about? I'm like helloooooooo, this is an election sir what do you mean it's nothing to worry about? But then again maybe he knows something that we don't but soon will once this hurricane debacle dies down for something to emerge that we have been waiting for, for a while now.

  4. I am posting again following my comments about the hype and media confusion of a CAT1 hurricane. Keep in mind that HAARP is not the only thing that heats the ionosphere; the sun is another source of warming. The website fails to take this fact into effect. They thereby fall into at least some of the rhetoric surrounding the "man-made global warming" politico-scientific dialectic. There's been a lot of hype over "man-made global warming" that refuses to acknowledge the effects of the sun on cloud formation and global average temperature increase. HAARP watchers seem to do this to a certain degree as well.

    Be careful not to fall into the backwash of the man-made global warming rhetoric. Sometimes the talk about HAARP plays into this. At least stay in a larger field of thought about these things.

    The following (taken from, the website for the National Association for Amateur Radio) is a good description of sun effects on the ionosphere:

    "The sun emits electromagnetic radiation and matter as a consequence of the nuclear fusion process. Electromagnetic radiation at wavelengths of 100 to 1000 Angstroms (ultraviolet) ionizes the F region, radiation at 10 to 100 Angstroms (soft X-rays) ionizes the E region, and radiation at 1 to 10 Angstroms (hard X- rays) ionizes the D region. Solar matter (which includes charged particles--electrons and protons) is ejected from the sun on a regular basis, and this comprises the solar wind. On a "quiet" solar day the speed of this solar wind heading toward Earth averages about 400 km per second.

    The sun's solar wind significantly impacts Earth's magnetic field. Instead of being a simple bar magnet, Earth's magnetic field is compressed by the solar wind on the side facing the sun and is stretched out on the side away from the sun (the magnetotail, which extends tens of earth radii downwind). While the sun's electromagnetic radiation can impact the entire ionosphere that is in daylight, charged particles ejected by the sun are guided into the ionosphere along magnetic field lines and thus can only impact high latitudes where the magnetic field lines go into the Earth."

    Could this be why the high reading on the website? I don't know for sure. However, I suspect that there's more going on here than people know.

    1. The sun's solar wind and it's impact on Earth's magnetic field is not the reason for the readings that are being seen- not just on If it was representative of solar wind/heat/etc, it would be seen in a greater area, and would be seen more often. The reading seen this past week have been off the charts. Readings that are off the charts + massive amounts of aerosol spraying and chembombs + a hurricane that is being directed into a specific direction (against many of the simulations that were generated last week) = something NOT natural

    2. May want to look at this thread:

  5. Dont be swayed by this storm being only a cat 1. This is probably going to be the lowest pressure for a storm to hit the east coast and have the largest wind field. When it lands it wont even be a hurricane, just a huge post tropical storm phasing with a very powerful artic jet stream.


  7. There is a Ben Fulford Article posted today @2012: What's the 'real' truth? It explains very concisely why this has been done and it is BONE CHILLING! Where are the cavalry? If there ever was a time to take action it is now! After a little research I have found that there are HAARP facilities in the U.K., Puerto Rico, Peru, Brazil, Norway, Russia, China, Japan and Australia. It is the Puerto Rico facility they are using to do this. I am not sure what, if anything could be done to seize control of it.

    1. Got his from guy working for phone call center.very excited US. has brought newe jobs to area.gave him some to researchNew facilitie being built in phillipines

  8. Here is the thread

  9. Maybe Drake's last week alert was not for no reasons. Thoughts?

  10. This is anon 11:18.

    I'm replying again with some thoughts about Edward Bernays and mass psychology. After glimpsing some of the news coverage tonight--you know, the kind with the "authority" standing in front of the radar map with the big, red fire-dragon hurricane wind blowing over and over again into New England--I've come to the conclusion that however HAARP is (or is not) being used in the case of this particular hurricane, the media coverage perfectly fulfills the stated goals of mass psychological control: getting the largest mass of people to watch the same event all at once with the same feelings generated by the imagery that the media supply.

    The coverage by the "experts" has never varied from lots of emotional hand-waving and only seldom reports about wind-speed. I should think that they might have had the time to read from the description of a category 1 hurricane. Pretty simple stuff. Very telling that they stuck to wind speed and left out the part about the broken shrubs and minor pier damage. The mayor of a city in New Jersey just called this an "epic storm."
    He talked about being "pro-active."

    Here's a quote from Propaganda, a book by Bernays published in 1928:

    The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country. ...We are governed, our minds are molded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested, largely by men we have never heard of. This is a logical result of the way in which our democratic society is organized. Vast numbers of human beings must cooperate in this manner if they are to live together as a smoothly functioning society. ...In almost every act of our daily lives, whether in the sphere of politics or business, in our social conduct or our ethical thinking, we are dominated by the relatively small number of persons...who understand the mental processes and social patterns of the masses. It is they who pull the wires which control the public mind."

    It seems that HAARP could be used to warm the water and guide the storm, maybe give it a nudge westward. It's possible that the moisture and clouds that fed into the hurricane were manipulated. But what are they really doing here? Are they creating whether in our minds?

  11. Sorry, it's me again. Anon 11:18.

    In reply to RTS about damage in Carribean. I had noticed that the television images depicted small wooden shanties. I got the distinct impression that the images or shots were highly limited and controlled. I noticed the same thing twenty years ago, when I was in college in southern California. The news vans were all parked on the street corners covering a little fire on a hillside, but the telvision in my apartment showed the world coming to an end.

    I've also noticed that the media covering this hurricane use various filters and exposures for certain desired effects: very light to make the clouds look larger, and so on.

    1. I was also thinking much the same thing. Unfortunately I have no sources in that area of the Caribbean to get a true assessment from.

  12. Hey, is this a FAKE storm? Check out the links before they are gone. Times Square live moving Cam: . And this video. and also this: Have we been lied too? Check out comments of GV 2012 too.

    1. That Times Square cam is great! but I'm not sure about the cimss animation- the date on the header says Oct 30 2012, but the header on the animation itself says Sept 16 2011, and I can't seem to find any from 2012.

  13. Are comments still open? Great! I live on the south shore of Long Island. Most people around here still do not have electricity and you have to find alternative routes because of trees in the streets-- still, 3 days after the storm! One mile south of me, which is about a mile or two from the water, virtually everyone lost the first floor of their homes due to the storm surge-- straight across the south shore of long island, town after town, probably thousands and thousands of people. Unfortunately, I believe the death toll will go up when they start adding up missing people. Although this was a cat 1 storm and we didn't take a direct hit, this was by far, the worse storm I've ever seen in 50+ years. THIS WAS NO FAKE STORM. Maybe the storm was enhanced but it happened.


Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.