Further to the article I put out yesterday:
You mean, kinda like Remotely Controlled Airplanes?!
hmmmmmmm..... Well that put's this following article into perspective a bit more, doesn't it?
FACT 1: The section of track the train crashed on was a speed restricted section, which means the computer takes over during that section and won't let the conductor go faster than the set limit (in this case 50 mph) even if he wants to. CONCLUSION: The conductor did not cause this
FACT 2: The conductor unexpectedly survived, and said the speed readouts on the train showed 50 mph up until he blacked out. Yet investigators have proven the train was doing 107 mph when it crashed. CONCLUSION: Something was amiss in the electronic controls that provide the readouts.
FACT 3: Survivors on the train said it was riding as smooth as glass up until the crash. CONCLUSION: The tracks were in excellent condition, SO GOOD that they did not have enough bumps and shakes to let anyone know the train was way over speed. This would have hid an impending crash reality from the conductor.
FACT 4: The crash happened at night, which also would have concealed the speed of the train from the conductor. CONCLUSION: He probably just looked at the readouts and believed them, not realizing anything was amiss at all until he woke up after blacking out. At 107 mph, he probably bounced off the interior of the engine and blacked out less than a quarter of a second after the train left the tracks, far too short of a time to realize anything happened at all.
FACT 5: The engine was brand spanking new, far less than a year old. CONCLUSION: It had all the nice new modern perfectly programmed to allow hacking computerized controls on it, and ADDITIONALLY, was new enough so the conductor may not have been fully acquainted with every last sound the motors made, and on top of that, the motors were probably extremely quiet which would also conceal the fact that the train was going way too fast.
FACT 6, AND HERE IS THE CLINCHER THAT PROVES IT WAS STUXNET OR A STUXNET VARIANT: The control readouts all indicated a low speed at a time when the train was doing over 100. What industrial virus keeps control readouts normal while it destroys a facility and everything goes kablooey?
ANSWER: STUXNET, and ONLY STUXNET. This is how Israel wrecked many of Iran's nuclear centrifuges, Stuxnet spun them too fast all the while the readouts said the speed was normal, JUST LIKE THIS TRAIN, there is no difference between a centrifuge motor speed readout and a speedometer, the zio clan is totally hosed with this one, THEY CRASHED THIS TRAIN AND THERE IS NO WAY OUT OF IT. Now the big question is,Since this train operates in America's main political corridor, WHO was on that train the zio clan wanted killed? Stuxnet Amtrak crash in Philadelphia involving train heavily used by politicians Am Amtrak train went off the tracks while going 106 miles an hour in the immediate approach to a 50 mph curve. Early reports said there was a huge explosion before derailment but I do not know what to make of them because people on the train have not said anything about an explosion. It looks like a scrap yard, not a train wreck and only 6 people died? YEAH RIGHT!
This was probably caused by a zio clan hack The trains are computer controlled with the conductor in a supervisory position, and that leaves serious room for questioning how one hit a 50 mph curve at 106 mph when it should have slowed down for it automatically, AND this happened right after it left a station, which means if there was a curve that close it should not have sped up at all. The whitewash is on now, And guess what? Another computer controlled subway train in Mexico City came into a station yesterday and rear ended another train at full speed. They explained it away as communication glitches and wet tracks but what a coincidence! The subway trains were amazingly shredded (like I never thought that could ever happen) and I suspected the zio clan played a game even before this latest Amtrak crash. The Amtrak crash happened so soon after the train left the station that tickets had not been collected yet.
One man said "We were rolling along nice and smooth and then all of a sudden we were on our side" Which is exactly what would happen if all the train did was accelerate to a point of doom. Try a 50 mph turn at 106. If you are asleep in the back seat (the perspective of all passengers) you will be going along nice and smooth and just "suddenly" (fill in the blank) There are other reports, such as it wobbled and went off the tracks, the brakes were hit and it went off the tracks, but this is what would be felt in the back of the train as the front flew off the tracks. Most likely the man who said it was all smooth and then the car was on its side was probably near the front. 106 is not fast for this particular train, which travels at up to 150 mph. The problem was that it hit a 50 mph curve at 106. If this was not a threat and was instead an actual assassination attempt, it seems it probably failed. One car got the brunt of the action and was mangled beyond belief but 5 were in fairly good condition afterwards.
Not bad for 106 mph. It could have been worse. I am going to stick with the original statements because we all know what happens with the white wash. BUT I WILL SAY THIS: Think back to the time frame prior to 6 or 7 years ago. Most of the the bad train accidents happened 100 years ago, then going into the 1960's they were practically unheard of. By the time we got to the 1990's it all became so safe that problems such as trains on the wrong track and trains going the wrong speed were nonexistent, it never happened because UN HACKED computers controlled it all. Why now, after the illustrious Stuxnet was invented have we returned to a train accident frequency similar to what happened in the 1800's? GOOD QUESTION.
See updates at: http://82.221.129.208/stuxnetamtrak.html
Jim Stone has put together a few more pieces of this puzzle- Article below. Computer controlled trains?
REALLY!?!
You mean, kinda like Remotely Controlled Airplanes?!
hmmmmmmm..... Well that put's this following article into perspective a bit more, doesn't it?
Officials: Amtrak train sped up before derailing
3
By Jesse Byrnes - 05/14/15 07:03 PM EDT
The Amtrak train involved in this week's deadly derailment sped up for about a minute before leaving the tracks near Pennsylvania, a member of the National Transportation Safety Board saidThursday evening.
Robert Sumwalt said footage from a camera mounted near the front of the train showed it had sped up from 70 miles per hour to more than 100 miles per hour before derailing at a curve.
The train was in a 50 mph section, The Associated Press notes, and Sumwalt said conductors have a timetable and should know the speed limits of particular sections of track.
Investigators plan to interview engineer Brandon Bostian, who also suffered injuries, in the next few days. He is allowed to bring along another individual, Sumwalt said, presumably his lawyer.
"We very much look forward to the opportunity to interview him," Sumwalt said of the engineer.
Bostian's lawyer, Robert Goggin, said earlier in the day Thursday that the man behind the controls had "no recollection" of the crash that left at least eight dead and injured more than 200.
http://thehill.com/policy/transportation/242175-officials-amtrak-train-sped-up-before-der
But then there is also this piece of news that the US media seems to not really reporting on:
FBI investigates report that projectile hit windshield of Amtrak train moments before it crashed... as it's revealed TWO other trains were also struck minutes apart on the same corridor
- -Conductor on derailed train said she overheard Amtrak Train 188 engineer Brandon Bostian report on the radio that his train was hit in the windshield
- -Moments later, at 9.21pm on Tuesday, the train derailed killing eight
- -At 9.05pm Tuesday, a different Amtrack train reported being struck in a window by an unknown object
- -At 9.10pm Tuesday, a northbound SEPTA regional rail train reported it had been 'hit by a rock or shot at' in the windshield
- -All three incidents happened within a few miles of 30th Street Station along the same stretch of track outside Philadelphia
- -FBI investigating damage to the 'left hand lower portion' of the windshield on the derailed Amtrak Train 188
- -Officials say there is no evidence the three incidents are connected - or that they had anything to do with the derailment
The FBI is investigating a report that the Amtrak train that crashed in Philadelphia on Tuesday night could have been 'shot at' moments before it derailed, killing eight and injuring 200.The new claim on Friday comes as investigators revealed that two other trains had suffered cracked windows after being hit by unknown objects just minutes before the deadly crash and only a few miles apart. An assistant conductor on Amtrak Train 188 has told National Transportation Safety Board investigators she heard Amtrak engineer Brandon Bostain say that his train had been hit by something. Seconds later, the train careened off the tracks.Photos of the derailed train show a small, focused crack on the lower left part of the windshield - though it's unknown whether the damage occurred before or after the crash.
Scroll down for video
Crack: The FBI is investigating what could have caused the small, focused crack (pictured lower right) on the windshield of the derailed Amtrak train
Bostian's comment was in response to a report from a SEPTA regional rail engineer, who radioed in to say his train had been 'hit by a rock or shot at' in the area about 9.10pm Tuesday. The projectile shattered the windshield of the northbound SEPTA train.Five minutes earlier, a projectile cracked a window of a different Amtrak train - a southbound Acela Express - about 9.05pm.Train 188, which was headed north from Philadelphia to New York, derailed at 9.21pm. All of the reported hits came within just a few miles of Philadelphia's 30th Street Station. SEPTA, Southeast Pennsylvania Transportation Authority, said there's no indication the object that hit the commuter rail train is related to the Amtrak derailment.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3083959/FBI-investigating-Amtrak-train-hit-object-SEPTA-train-hit-before.html#ixzz3aKfb0v00
Oh noooooooo..... the incidents have NOTHING in common, and I'm sure they're not related in any way at all. No really!
And finally, I would like to point everyone's attention to the wikipedia listing of train accidents for 2015 so far.... please note my highlights....
- -Conductor on derailed train said she overheard Amtrak Train 188 engineer Brandon Bostian report on the radio that his train was hit in the windshield
- -Moments later, at 9.21pm on Tuesday, the train derailed killing eight
- -At 9.05pm Tuesday, a different Amtrack train reported being struck in a window by an unknown object
- -At 9.10pm Tuesday, a northbound SEPTA regional rail train reported it had been 'hit by a rock or shot at' in the windshield
- -All three incidents happened within a few miles of 30th Street Station along the same stretch of track outside Philadelphia
- -FBI investigating damage to the 'left hand lower portion' of the windshield on the derailed Amtrak Train 188
- -Officials say there is no evidence the three incidents are connected - or that they had anything to do with the derailment
The FBI is investigating a report that the Amtrak train that crashed in Philadelphia on Tuesday night could have been 'shot at' moments before it derailed, killing eight and injuring 200.The new claim on Friday comes as investigators revealed that two other trains had suffered cracked windows after being hit by unknown objects just minutes before the deadly crash and only a few miles apart. An assistant conductor on Amtrak Train 188 has told National Transportation Safety Board investigators she heard Amtrak engineer Brandon Bostain say that his train had been hit by something. Seconds later, the train careened off the tracks.Photos of the derailed train show a small, focused crack on the lower left part of the windshield - though it's unknown whether the damage occurred before or after the crash.
Scroll down for video
Scroll down for video
Crack: The FBI is investigating what could have caused the small, focused crack (pictured lower right) on the windshield of the derailed Amtrak train
Bostian's comment was in response to a report from a SEPTA regional rail engineer, who radioed in to say his train had been 'hit by a rock or shot at' in the area about 9.10pm Tuesday. The projectile shattered the windshield of the northbound SEPTA train.Five minutes earlier, a projectile cracked a window of a different Amtrak train - a southbound Acela Express - about 9.05pm.Train 188, which was headed north from Philadelphia to New York, derailed at 9.21pm. All of the reported hits came within just a few miles of Philadelphia's 30th Street Station. SEPTA, Southeast Pennsylvania Transportation Authority, said there's no indication the object that hit the commuter rail train is related to the Amtrak derailment.
2015[edit]
- 7 January – Canada – A CN freight train hauling 114 cars heading east from Edmonton, Alberta to Saskatoon, Saskatchewan derailed between the community of Jarrow, Alberta and village of Irma. Twenty-three cars derailed, of which one began leaking a non-dangerous liquid adhesive. The ensuing cleanup resulted in the temporary closure of a section of Highway 14.[286]
- 14 January – United States – A Reuters online news story article, from Austin, Texas, appearing on the MSN News webpage, on Wednesday, January 14, 2015, stated that aTexas prison bus carrying 15 people was hit by a train. At least ten people were killed near Odessa, Texas, according to a CBS affiliate and the Odessa American newspaper. The Texas Department of Criminal Justice bus with 12 inmates and three officers was traveling from Abilene, Texas to El Paso, Texas. The Medical Center Hospital in Odessa is treating five patients, according to a hospital spokeswoman. No further information on injuries or deaths or further victims was provided by the hospital or the Department.[287]
- 3 February – United States – A Metro-North Railroad train strikes one car at a crossing and catches on fire, killing six people.[288]
- 13 February – India – Anekal derailment of Intercity Express in the Bangalore of Karnataka, India killing ten and injuring one-fifty more.[289][290]
- 16 February – Canada – A CN freight train transporting crude oil derailed 80 km south of Timmins, Ontario. 29 of 100 cars derailed, and seven crude oil tank cars caught fire. There were no injuries and the burning oil was contained to the area. [291]
- 16 February – United States – A CSX freight train derails in West Virginia. At least 7 crude oil tank cars catch fire, with over 60 people evacuated from their homes nearby.[292]
- 20 February – Switzerland – Rafz train crash: an S-Bahn train and an Interregio express train collide at Rafz.[293]
- 24 February – United States – Oxnard train derailment: a Metrolink train hit a road vehicle at Oxnard, California.[294] The train engineer died and 29 others were injured.
- 25 February – United States – A CN freight train traveling from Winnepeg, Manitoba to Superior, Wisconsin derailed 25 miles northwest of Duluth, Minnesota. Thirteen of the 107 cars in the consist, some of which contained naphthalene, left the track without breaching. No injuries reported.[295][296]
- 5 March – United States – A BNSF oil train derails in a rural area near Galena, Illinois. Twenty-one of the 105 cars, containing Bakken formation crude oil, leave the track and catch fire, which continues to burn. No injuries are reported.[297]
- 6 March – Netherlands – A passenger train runs into the rear of a freight train between Tilburg Universiteit and Tilburg stations. A few passengers suffer slight injuries.[298]
- 7 March – Canada – A CN freight train derailed near the small Northern Ontario village of Gogama, Ontario. Forty of 100 cars derailed, with 5 entering the Makami River and 7 carrying crude oil catching fire and burning for several days. It is the second CN derailment in the area in the past month. [299]
- 7 March – United Kingdom – A charter train overran a signal at Wootton Bassett, Wiltshire and came to a stop foul of a junction, where an express train had passed through a minute earlier. As a direct result of the incident, West Coast Railway Company were banned from accessing all rail lines in the United Kingdom as of 3 April 2015.[300]
- 9 March – United States – An Amtrak passenger train collides with a tractor trailer in Halifax, North Carolina. No life-threatening injuries were reported. The accident was caught on video.[301]
- 10 March – Vietnam – A passenger train collides with a vehicle on a level crossing in Hai Lang District and is derailed. The train driver is killed and four people were seriously injured.[302]
- 12 March – Netherlands – A fire occurs on a passenger train at Abcoude, Utrecht. All on board are evacuated.[303] Twenty-four people are taken to hospital.[304]
- 20 March – India – 15 dead, 150 people injured as Dehradun-Varanasi Janta Express derails in Uttar Pradesh's Rae Bareli.[305]
- 26 March – Thailand – A passenger train runs into the rear of another in Phachi District. Fifty two people are injured in the collision,[306] three seriously.[307]
- 28 March – United States – An Expo Line train collided with two cars, causing the 2015 Los Angeles train crash. There are at least 21 injuries.[308]
- 31 March – Australia – A freight train runs into the rear of another at Keswick, Adelaide, South Australia. At least one of the trains is derailed and two level crossings are blocked.[309]
- 10 April – Canada – A freight train derails north east of Calgary, Alberta.[310]
- 27 April – United States – Several well cars of a Union Pacific train derailed off a bridge near Bridge City, Louisiana during a severe storm. The event was caught on tape from a car's dashcam.[citation needed]
- 28 April – South Africa – Two passenger trains collided at Denver station, near Johannesburg. One person is killed and about 240 are injured.[311]
- 6 May – United States – A train derailed near Heimdal, North Dakota, which ignited a crude oil fire in six tanker cars and forced the evacuation of approximately 40 nearby residents. No injuries or fatalities were reported.[312]
- 12 May – United States – Amtrak passenger train Northeast Regional Train 188, en route from Washington, D.C. to New York City and carrying an estimated 238 passengers and five crew, derailed and partially rolled over on its side in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, in the Port Richmond neighborhood. More than 200 were injured, out of the 243 passengers and crew on the train (eleven critically; eight of those critically injured were at one hospital and those eight were expected to fully recover) in the derailment,[313] with a confirmation of 8 deaths (this is still subject to change, though most of the critical injuries are expected to recover, especially since the wreckage is being cleared and sorted and searched). With the current death toll of 8, as of Thursday, May 14, 2015, this is the U.S.'s deadliest train incident in almost six years.[314][315]
- 16 May – Germany – A passenger train collides with an agrucultural vehicle on a level crossing at Ibbenbüren, North-Rhine Westphalia. Two people are killed and twenty are injured.[316]
Now, before anyone says anything about how busy the US rail system is, or how many trains run through the US daily..... I have traveled extensively through Asia and Europe, and I can tell you that North America ain't got nothin on India or Europe. Just to give a quick example:
- India runs 12,617 passenger trains and 7421 freight trains daily.
And yet...... look at the number of US Train crashes compared to the number of train crashes in India? And look at Canada. Do you really think that India's Railway lines are in better condition than the US'? Not to mention the ages of the trains? The Amtrak train that crashed outside of Philadelphia was less than a year old.....
India Crashes: 2
Canada Crashes: 4
America Crashes: 11
Yea...... I don't think so.
And the people who died "on the train" ..... remember this:
Now, before anyone says anything about how busy the US rail system is, or how many trains run through the US daily..... I have traveled extensively through Asia and Europe, and I can tell you that North America ain't got nothin on India or Europe. Just to give a quick example:
- India runs 12,617 passenger trains and 7421 freight trains daily.
India Crashes: 2
Yea...... I don't think so.
And the people who died "on the train" ..... remember this:
3 JP Morgan Bankers, a Pharmaceutical Scientist, and an Art Curator Walk onto a Train....
.... Just sayin'.
d
UPDATE: STUXNET WAS DEFINITELY USED TO CRASH THE TRAIN, IT IS TOTALLY PROVEN.
FACT 1: The section of track the train crashed on was a speed restricted section, which means the computer takes over during that section and won't let the conductor go faster than the set limit (in this case 50 mph) even if he wants to. CONCLUSION: The conductor did not cause this
FACT 2: The conductor unexpectedly survived, and said the speed readouts on the train showed 50 mph up until he blacked out. Yet investigators have proven the train was doing 107 mph when it crashed. CONCLUSION: Something was amiss in the electronic controls that provide the readouts.
FACT 3: Survivors on the train said it was riding as smooth as glass up until the crash. CONCLUSION: The tracks were in excellent condition, SO GOOD that they did not have enough bumps and shakes to let anyone know the train was way over speed. This would have hid an impending crash reality from the conductor.
FACT 4: The crash happened at night, which also would have concealed the speed of the train from the conductor. CONCLUSION: He probably just looked at the readouts and believed them, not realizing anything was amiss at all until he woke up after blacking out. At 107 mph, he probably bounced off the interior of the engine and blacked out less than a quarter of a second after the train left the tracks, far too short of a time to realize anything happened at all.
FACT 5: The engine was brand spanking new, far less than a year old. CONCLUSION: It had all the nice new modern perfectly programmed to allow hacking computerized controls on it, and ADDITIONALLY, was new enough so the conductor may not have been fully acquainted with every last sound the motors made, and on top of that, the motors were probably extremely quiet which would also conceal the fact that the train was going way too fast.
FACT 6, AND HERE IS THE CLINCHER THAT PROVES IT WAS STUXNET OR A STUXNET VARIANT: The control readouts all indicated a low speed at a time when the train was doing over 100. What industrial virus keeps control readouts normal while it destroys a facility and everything goes kablooey?
ANSWER: STUXNET, and ONLY STUXNET. This is how Israel wrecked many of Iran's nuclear centrifuges, Stuxnet spun them too fast all the while the readouts said the speed was normal, JUST LIKE THIS TRAIN, there is no difference between a centrifuge motor speed readout and a speedometer, the zio clan is totally hosed with this one, THEY CRASHED THIS TRAIN AND THERE IS NO WAY OUT OF IT. Now the big question is,Since this train operates in America's main political corridor, WHO was on that train the zio clan wanted killed? Stuxnet Amtrak crash in Philadelphia involving train heavily used by politicians Am Amtrak train went off the tracks while going 106 miles an hour in the immediate approach to a 50 mph curve. Early reports said there was a huge explosion before derailment but I do not know what to make of them because people on the train have not said anything about an explosion. It looks like a scrap yard, not a train wreck and only 6 people died? YEAH RIGHT!
This was probably caused by a zio clan hack The trains are computer controlled with the conductor in a supervisory position, and that leaves serious room for questioning how one hit a 50 mph curve at 106 mph when it should have slowed down for it automatically, AND this happened right after it left a station, which means if there was a curve that close it should not have sped up at all. The whitewash is on now, And guess what? Another computer controlled subway train in Mexico City came into a station yesterday and rear ended another train at full speed. They explained it away as communication glitches and wet tracks but what a coincidence! The subway trains were amazingly shredded (like I never thought that could ever happen) and I suspected the zio clan played a game even before this latest Amtrak crash. The Amtrak crash happened so soon after the train left the station that tickets had not been collected yet.
One man said "We were rolling along nice and smooth and then all of a sudden we were on our side" Which is exactly what would happen if all the train did was accelerate to a point of doom. Try a 50 mph turn at 106. If you are asleep in the back seat (the perspective of all passengers) you will be going along nice and smooth and just "suddenly" (fill in the blank) There are other reports, such as it wobbled and went off the tracks, the brakes were hit and it went off the tracks, but this is what would be felt in the back of the train as the front flew off the tracks. Most likely the man who said it was all smooth and then the car was on its side was probably near the front. 106 is not fast for this particular train, which travels at up to 150 mph. The problem was that it hit a 50 mph curve at 106. If this was not a threat and was instead an actual assassination attempt, it seems it probably failed. One car got the brunt of the action and was mangled beyond belief but 5 were in fairly good condition afterwards.
Not bad for 106 mph. It could have been worse. I am going to stick with the original statements because we all know what happens with the white wash. BUT I WILL SAY THIS: Think back to the time frame prior to 6 or 7 years ago. Most of the the bad train accidents happened 100 years ago, then going into the 1960's they were practically unheard of. By the time we got to the 1990's it all became so safe that problems such as trains on the wrong track and trains going the wrong speed were nonexistent, it never happened because UN HACKED computers controlled it all. Why now, after the illustrious Stuxnet was invented have we returned to a train accident frequency similar to what happened in the 1800's? GOOD QUESTION.
See updates at: http://82.221.129.208/stuxnetamtrak.html
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.