In preparation for tonight's Transpicuous News Report, I have a couple of articles I want to direct your attention to- call it "pre" homework, if you will. This first one is a set of articles put out by Ken at redefininggod.com.
Over the course of the past few months I have been setting the stage, so to speak, for what I wish to talk about tonight on Transpicuous News. I have used the expression "Same girl, different party dress" for years now when speaking about the so called "New" financial system that "they" are/have created. I have talked about the fact that all these various movements and actions by "different" groups/countries/organizations to plant their flag at the top of the dung heap, are nothing more than public posturing that means nothing, as they are all just a continuation of Slavery 2.0. This is a VITALLY important piece of the puzzle that people need to clearly understand.
This morning I went searching to find some of the back ground information that I've read over the years, to clearly outline the points I wish to make tonight on the show, and low and behold, Ken has pulled the vast majority of all of that work together in several very well researched articles that he has published at Redefininggod. .... I am not one to look a gift horse in the mouth, so to Ken I say thank you for doing all my dirty work for me and allowing me to focus my attention not on the set up of the maneuvers of the past, but on the actions of the NOW.
At this point in "time" even main stream pundits are stating what the alternative media has been saying for years: That the so called two (three, four) party political systems of "democratic" countries are no more than an illusion of choice. The reality is that all of these political parties are one and the same and working for exactly the same goals. Of course the booby prize for making this fully transparent goes to US Congress, which has thoroughly highlighted and blazingly shone a spotlight on the fact that it doesn't matter which "party" is in power- they are all one and the same. Nothing is done differently as an end result of who has "control" of Congress. While it's easy to point this out when making fun of the US, Canada, England, Australia, Germany, France...... you name it: They are all the same, and all run from the same Template. The vast majority of the "awakened" public know this.
Now comes the jump in reasoning that many people seem to miss.
If the players of the internal, national, "governments" are all the same..... why would anyone think that International politics would be any different? To clarify: They are all just the same girl in a different party dress GLOBALLY.
The Illusion is that there are different factions, different "controllers", different political/national entities that are all battling for supremacy. But this is only an Illusion. It is a scam, a misdirection, a ploy placed in front of the public to allow them to maneuver the people into accepting the globalist agenda: New World Order.
Last week on Transpicuous News I talked about the book "Silent weapons for quiet wars" and I stated that what we are seeing being played out on the global stage isn't the beginning of "World War III", it is actually the END of it. In my opinion this is a very important piece of the puzzle that people need to understand, because in understanding that this "WAR" has been raging, quietly, for decades, it allows people to SEE what has actually been done to set up this entire Theatre Production.
... As I said a while ago when talking about the "New" financial system(s) - it doesn't matter who gets to be the proverbial "King of the Castle", because they are ALL THE SAME.
Who wins EVERY war?
The Bankers.
Just think about that fact for a moment.
A couple of months ago I had an intel conversation that spun into focus again this morning. The person I was talking to (on actually a different topic altogether) stated that the entire "BRICs" movement was just a decoy, and that their "new" banks and systems would look like they are separate entities from the BIS, IMF and World Bank, but in fact they would be under the control of the EXACT same people and would/will be run as a diversionary tactic to give the illusion that there were TWO sides, TWO movements, TWO "choices", TWO different organizations.... when in fact there will be the EXACT SAME CONTROLLERS in charge of BOTH.
Who wins EVERY War?
The Bankers.
Now..... do you SEE what is being done? Do you see the plan as it has been laid out to misdirect the public from what is really going on? US vs Russia? Really? Yet I've pointed out several articles over the past few weeks that negates that entire "sanctions" scenario- that in fact the US is working with Russia and China on several projects- like the "new" financial ratings company that has been pushed by the main stream and alternative media, that is a three way joint US, Russia and China company. Like the US buying rockets from Russia. Like Russia using US Master card for their new internal payments system.
Right now the "big Three" are very publicly gathering up their purported supporters and making "alliances" on the global stage. But when we really look at some of these various "alliances" and the "offers" that have been put on the table to different nations- like Venezuela, Nigeria, Zimbabwe, etc....- it is a replica of Hollywood's "Good Cop/Bad Cop" scenario. The US plays the bully boy, running rough shod over these nations, then China (or Russia) comes along and says "don't worry mate, we can look after you, give you some money, help you out....." and sets in place trade deals and agreements. On the surface it looks like China is the Good cop, just helping a fella out of a tight spot. Yet when you see that the US and China are on the SAME SIDE, then you see that the nation in question just sold out to the ultimate controller anyway. Which was the plan right from the beginning.
And any "Nation" that doesn't fall in line with that strategy is taken over through WAR - both with bombs and bullets, and financial tools of destruction. Saddam Hussein, Muammar al-Gaddafi, Kim Jong Il, along with various South/Central American, African and Asian leaders who've been "over thrown" in the past 50 years, have all had one thing in common: They stood against the Banker Controllers and they were taken down.
Good Cop. Bad Cop. They all still work for the same police force.
The Bankers always win the "War". Once you realize that ONE fact, it puts all of the media circuses, all the political "battles", all of the posturing for "world domination" into perspective.
Do you see?
Later on today I will republish a second article, by the Philosophy of Metrics writer JC Collins, that is the next important piece in the puzzle for people to see.
Tonight, I will discuss many of these aspects of what I have laid out here today with the immense help of Ken and JC and their very well researched articles.
d
For anyone who might still believe that the US/NATO versus Russia/BRICS geopolitical confrontation is real…
…here is a little blast from the past…
…It is the cover from the January 9, 1988 issue of The Economist magazine. Note the phoenix rising from the ashes of burning national currencies, including the dollar.
The cover relates to an article on pages 9-10 titled Get ready for the phoenix, which foretold the financial drama we are now watching unfold in real time. Upon stumbling across them, I found the cover art and the article so striking that I thought they might be an online forgery, so I verified their authenticity with a research librarian at the Newspaper and Current Periodical Room of the Library of Congress. Both the cover and the article are quite real. Here are some excerpts (not necessarily in the order in which they appear in the article)…
>>> THIRTY years from now, Americans, Japanese, Europeans, and people in many other rich countries, and some relatively poor ones will probably be paying for their shopping with the same currency. Prices will be quoted not in dollars, yen or D-marks but in, let’s say, the phoenix. The phoenix will be favoured by companies and shoppers because it will be more convenient than today’s national currencies, which by then will seem a quaint cause of much disruption to economic life in the last twentieth century…
…The phoenix would probably start as a cocktail of national currencies, just as the Special Drawing Right is today. In time, though, its value against national currencies would cease to matter, because people would choose it for its convenience and the stability of its purchasing power…
…The phoenix zone would impose tight constraints on national governments. There would be no such thing, for instance, as a national monetary policy. The world phoenix supply would be fixed by a new central bank, descended perhaps from the IMF…
…Governments are far from ready to subordinate their domestic objectives to the goal of international stability. Several more big exchange-rate upsets, a few more stockmarket crashes and probably a slump or two will be needed before politicians are willing to face squarely up to that choice…
…Pencil in the phoenix for around 2018, and welcome it when it comes. <<<
It’s all there: the SDR “cocktail” (basket) of currencies, the IMF’s central role, and the need to create “exchange rate upsets, stockmarket crashes, and economic slumps” to make the public accept it. Seeing such an accurate forecast/blueprint, one wonders who was behind its publishing. So if we look into The Economist magazine, we find it is headquartered just a few blocks from the City of London and is owned by The Economist Group, which itself is owned by some rather interesting characters…
“The Economist Group is 50% owned by Pearson PLC via The Financial Times Limited. The bulk of the remaining shares are held by individual shareholders including the Cadbury, Rothschild, Schroder, Agnelli and other family interests as well as a number of staff and former staff shareholders.”Continue reading HERE
.....Why China? Why would the Illuminati, whose home base is in Western Europe, have the Chinese front the public face of their New World Order? A clue to their motivations and strategy can be found in this article, titled “Colonial Elite Rules China for the Illuminati.” In it, the author states…
“The Chinese people would revolt against overt foreign domination, but embrace their place in the NWO if they believed they were in control.”
The Chinese have suffered greatly at the hands of Western imperialism, as has much of the world. As a result, the Illuminati would have trouble roping many nations into a Western-led New World Order, especially the nationalistic Chinese. Since you can’t have a truly global order without the most populous nation on Earth, the Illuminati opted to use their own legacy of destruction to their advantage. Their two-part strategy to do so is as follows:
1 – They set up a China-centered alliance as an opposing force to the Western alliance.
This part of the strategy was hinted at in the mainstream press in this 2002 UPI article, titled “China Wants Its Own ‘New World Order’ To Oppose US Version.” It is common practice for the Cabal to use opposing forces to achieve their ends, and they always make sure they have influence or control over both sides.
2 – They have been driving the world public into the hands of the Chinese alliance.
How have they approached this, you ask?
> They have widely publicized a heinous New World Order planned by the Western Powers while simultaneously publicizing a benign New World Order planned by China and its allies (thus establishing danger from one side and safety from another).
> They have instigated outrageous and provocative action, both economic and military, by the Western powers (this adds a new insight into the open-for-all-to-see Wall Street / City of London criminality and recent Western military boondoggles in Afghanistan, Iraq, Egypt, Libya, and Syria).
> They have broadly exposed damaging information about Western nations, especially the US. This is the motivation behind WikiLeaks, Snowden, and a thousand smaller disclosures. And after Snowden outed the NSA’s activities to the general public, where did he run to hide? First to China (Hong Kong), then to Russia. So what is the psychological message? China and Russia (the BRICS alliance) are where you run for safety from the evil US, its Western allies, and all their horrible behavior.
It is really very simple: the Illuminati built a rabbit trap (in the BRICS alliance) that looks like a nice, safe hole to hide from danger. Now they are beating the bushes (with the Western powers) to drive the rabbits toward the trap.<<<
Clearly, the globalists took into account “the aspirations of peoples all over the globe… to emerge rapidly and conclusively from the era of colonialism” in their planning of the NWO. It is for this reason that the BRICS alliance was formed and the NWO was designed in a multipolar fashion. They want the oppressed peoples of the world to join together and see themselves beating the West. And they want them to believe that the Illuminati’s multipolar New World Order represents their final victory over oppression and ascension to equality, when it is actually just the beginning of a new phase of subjugation and their fall into equality as global serfs.
With the Rockefeller plan for the BRICS New World Order laid out before us, let’s take a look at how it was implemented.
China: Building up the False Savior
Major moves towards building the New World Order outlined in Prospect for America began in the late sixties…
1969 – The International Monetary Fund (IMF) introduces the Special Drawing Right, the planned replacement for the US dollar as the global reserve currency…
July 1971 – former Special Studies Project director Henry Kissinger held secret meetings in China to lay the groundwork for their introduction onto the global stage.
Continue Reading HERE
Over the course of the past few months I have been setting the stage, so to speak, for what I wish to talk about tonight on Transpicuous News. I have used the expression "Same girl, different party dress" for years now when speaking about the so called "New" financial system that "they" are/have created. I have talked about the fact that all these various movements and actions by "different" groups/countries/organizations to plant their flag at the top of the dung heap, are nothing more than public posturing that means nothing, as they are all just a continuation of Slavery 2.0. This is a VITALLY important piece of the puzzle that people need to clearly understand.
This morning I went searching to find some of the back ground information that I've read over the years, to clearly outline the points I wish to make tonight on the show, and low and behold, Ken has pulled the vast majority of all of that work together in several very well researched articles that he has published at Redefininggod. .... I am not one to look a gift horse in the mouth, so to Ken I say thank you for doing all my dirty work for me and allowing me to focus my attention not on the set up of the maneuvers of the past, but on the actions of the NOW.
At this point in "time" even main stream pundits are stating what the alternative media has been saying for years: That the so called two (three, four) party political systems of "democratic" countries are no more than an illusion of choice. The reality is that all of these political parties are one and the same and working for exactly the same goals. Of course the booby prize for making this fully transparent goes to US Congress, which has thoroughly highlighted and blazingly shone a spotlight on the fact that it doesn't matter which "party" is in power- they are all one and the same. Nothing is done differently as an end result of who has "control" of Congress. While it's easy to point this out when making fun of the US, Canada, England, Australia, Germany, France...... you name it: They are all the same, and all run from the same Template. The vast majority of the "awakened" public know this.
Now comes the jump in reasoning that many people seem to miss.
If the players of the internal, national, "governments" are all the same..... why would anyone think that International politics would be any different? To clarify: They are all just the same girl in a different party dress GLOBALLY.
The Illusion is that there are different factions, different "controllers", different political/national entities that are all battling for supremacy. But this is only an Illusion. It is a scam, a misdirection, a ploy placed in front of the public to allow them to maneuver the people into accepting the globalist agenda: New World Order.
Last week on Transpicuous News I talked about the book "Silent weapons for quiet wars" and I stated that what we are seeing being played out on the global stage isn't the beginning of "World War III", it is actually the END of it. In my opinion this is a very important piece of the puzzle that people need to understand, because in understanding that this "WAR" has been raging, quietly, for decades, it allows people to SEE what has actually been done to set up this entire Theatre Production.
... As I said a while ago when talking about the "New" financial system(s) - it doesn't matter who gets to be the proverbial "King of the Castle", because they are ALL THE SAME.
Who wins EVERY war?
The Bankers.
Just think about that fact for a moment.
A couple of months ago I had an intel conversation that spun into focus again this morning. The person I was talking to (on actually a different topic altogether) stated that the entire "BRICs" movement was just a decoy, and that their "new" banks and systems would look like they are separate entities from the BIS, IMF and World Bank, but in fact they would be under the control of the EXACT same people and would/will be run as a diversionary tactic to give the illusion that there were TWO sides, TWO movements, TWO "choices", TWO different organizations.... when in fact there will be the EXACT SAME CONTROLLERS in charge of BOTH.
Who wins EVERY War?
The Bankers.
Now..... do you SEE what is being done? Do you see the plan as it has been laid out to misdirect the public from what is really going on? US vs Russia? Really? Yet I've pointed out several articles over the past few weeks that negates that entire "sanctions" scenario- that in fact the US is working with Russia and China on several projects- like the "new" financial ratings company that has been pushed by the main stream and alternative media, that is a three way joint US, Russia and China company. Like the US buying rockets from Russia. Like Russia using US Master card for their new internal payments system.
Right now the "big Three" are very publicly gathering up their purported supporters and making "alliances" on the global stage. But when we really look at some of these various "alliances" and the "offers" that have been put on the table to different nations- like Venezuela, Nigeria, Zimbabwe, etc....- it is a replica of Hollywood's "Good Cop/Bad Cop" scenario. The US plays the bully boy, running rough shod over these nations, then China (or Russia) comes along and says "don't worry mate, we can look after you, give you some money, help you out....." and sets in place trade deals and agreements. On the surface it looks like China is the Good cop, just helping a fella out of a tight spot. Yet when you see that the US and China are on the SAME SIDE, then you see that the nation in question just sold out to the ultimate controller anyway. Which was the plan right from the beginning.
And any "Nation" that doesn't fall in line with that strategy is taken over through WAR - both with bombs and bullets, and financial tools of destruction. Saddam Hussein, Muammar al-Gaddafi, Kim Jong Il, along with various South/Central American, African and Asian leaders who've been "over thrown" in the past 50 years, have all had one thing in common: They stood against the Banker Controllers and they were taken down.
Good Cop. Bad Cop. They all still work for the same police force.
The Bankers always win the "War". Once you realize that ONE fact, it puts all of the media circuses, all the political "battles", all of the posturing for "world domination" into perspective.
Do you see?
Later on today I will republish a second article, by the Philosophy of Metrics writer JC Collins, that is the next important piece in the puzzle for people to see.
Tonight, I will discuss many of these aspects of what I have laid out here today with the immense help of Ken and JC and their very well researched articles.
d
China’s complicity in building the Rockefeller New World Order, in their own words…
In my last entry, The Rockefeller Plan for the BRICS New World Order, in their own words,
I laid out the Rockefeller Plan for the New World Order (NWO) as
reflected in their official blueprint for it, a 1961 book titled Prospect for America.
Given the reaction counters I saw for the article, I can tell that I
need to explain things even further to reach certain people. So in this
entry, I will continue to expose the globalist plot by pointing out how
the Chinese government is assisting in the construction of the
Rockefeller NWO.
To begin, let’s take a look at…
The Chinese Economic Propaganda Line
In the aftermath of the US Government “shutdown” of October 2013, I came across a very telling Xinhua article titled U.S. fiscal failure warrants a de-Americanized world. If you’re unfamiliar with the Xinhua News Agency, here is a little snippet from their Wikipedia page…
“The Xinhua News Agency is the state press agency of the People’s Republic of China. Xinhua is a ministry-level department subordinate to the State Council. Its president is a member of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China.”
So the information put forth by Xinhua reflects the official propaganda line of the Chinese Communist Party, which makes what the article said all the more interesting. Here is what I wrote about it at the time…
It should be well known to all by now that the mainstream media, as well as the bulk of the alternative media, are attempting to portray a geopolitical conflict featuring the Anglo-American bankers & NATO on one side and the BRICS bankers & militaries on the other. The brings forward an obvious question: if China and their BRICS allies are really acting in opposition to the Western Establishment, why are they pointing to the Western globalist institutions as the solution to the world’s ills?
To help answer that question, let’s have a closer look at the institutions touted by the Chinese article…
1) The United Nations (UN) – According to the Rockefellers’ Prospect for America blueprint for world government, the United Nations is the international body that will exercise authority over regional groupings of the world’s nations. The institution itself was founded at the behest of the Western central banking families, and it was such a pet project of the Rockefellers that they decided where and how it would be built and provided the land on which it now stands.
The United Nations Headquarters complex “was constructed in stages with the core complex completed between 1948 and 1952. The Headquarters occupies a site beside the East River, on 17 acres of land purchased from the foremost New York real estate developer of the time, William Zeckendorf, Sr. Nelson Rockefeller arranged this purchase, after an initial offer to locate it on the Rockefeller family estate of Kykuit was rejected as being too isolated from Manhattan. The US$8.5 million (adjusted by inflation US$83.4 million) purchase was then funded by his father, John D. Rockefeller, Jr., who donated it to the city. Wallace Harrison, the personal architectural adviser for the Rockefeller family, and a prominent corporate architect, served as the Director of Planning for the United Nations Headquarters. His firm, Harrison and Abramovitz, oversaw the execution of the design.”
Upon clicking the link to the Wikipedia entry on Kykuit (the Rockefeller family estate), I found this extra bit of insight…
“In late 1946 two of [John D. Rockefeller] Junior’s sons, John D. 3rd and Laurance, each offered their respective residences, Rockwood Hall and Fieldwood Farm, as headquarters for the then newly formed United Nations. Family patriarch Junior vetoed the proposals as too isolated from Manhattan. He tasked second son, Nelson, to buy a 6.9-hectare (17-acre) site along the East River, subsequently donated for the construction of the UN Headquarters.”
Don’t you find it interesting that the location of the United Nations Headquarters was decided by an internal discussion amongst John D. Rockefeller Jr. and his sons?
2) The World Bank (WB) – Many people may be unaware that the World Bank is “a United Nations international financial institution that provides loans to developing countries for capital programs. The World Bank is a component of the World Bank Group, and a member of the United Nations Development Group.” It was created at the Bretton Woods Conference of 1944. And what was the formal name of the Bretton Woods Conference? The “United Nations Monetary and Financial Conference.”
3) The International Monetary Fund (IMF) – The IMF was also a creation of the United Nations Monetary and Financial Conference of 1944. And like the World Bank Group, the IMF is a Specialized Agency of the United Nations.
Specialized Agencies are “autonomous organizations working with the United Nations and each other through the coordinating machinery of the United Nations Economic and Social Council at the intergovernmental level, and through the Chief Executives Board for coordination (CEB) at the inter-secretariat level. Specialized agencies may or may not have been originally created by the United Nations, but they are incorporated into the United Nations System by the United Nations Economic and Social Council acting under Articles 57 and 63 of the United Nations Charter.”
So basically, the UN, WB and IMF are part of one giant globalist complex put in place by the Rockefellers and their affiliated global bankster families. Among the banking clans, the Rockefellers had a very prominent role in the creation of the global government because they were the family whose base nation (the US) emerged from World War 2 with the most wealth and power. The Rockefellers had the biggest tool at their disposal (America), so they wore that tool down to the nub to build the NWO. And this globalist complex is what the Chinese offer as the solution to the world’s problems (which also were created by the bankster families)?
With an overview of the globalist complex in place, let’s have a look at more of what the Chinese have been saying.
China’s Central Banker and the IMF
In the course of researching this article, I came across a link to a March 2009 speech by Zhou Xiaochuan…
…titled “Reform the International Monetary System.”
The speech was given during the depths of the 2007-2009 financial crisis and follows the globalists’ standard “let’s create a problem, then offer our solution” template. He begins by pointing to the problems posed by the (engineered) economic meltdown, then he goes on to explain how a new kind of global reserve currency would solve all those problems. Finally, he makes his recommendation…
“The scope of using the SDR should be broadened, so as to enable it to fully satisfy the [IMF] member countries’ demand for a reserve currency.”
His recommendation for the gradual replacement of existing national reserve currencies with the IMF’s Special Drawing Right (SDR) is the same thing the Western banksters have been calling for since the SDR’s creation (see Mainstream globalist propaganda reveals East/West conflict is a farce).
Zhou’s speech is such a classic example of the problem / reaction / solution strategy that I recommend reading it in its entirety. If you find such speeches too dry and difficult to understand, though, I’ll provide an explanation of the key passages from the speech in Update 1 at the bottom of this article.
Governance changes will turn evil globalist institutions into good?
Bankster propagandists attempt to explain-away the BRICS Alliance’s adherence to the globalist institutions by making the argument that the Alliance is somehow outmaneuvering the Western elite and taking over the institutions from within. In fact, Zhou makes mention of “voice and representation reform” for the IMF in his speech, and he brings it up again in PDF page 4 of his International Monetary and Financial Committee statement from October 11 of this year…
This widely-parroted propaganda theme of instituting governance reforms to end the “unipolar” dominance of the global institutions by the United States and their Western allies would be convincing except for one thing: the Rockefeller propagandists are using the same talking points as the BRICS propagandists. Here is a portion of an article from Finance and Development Magazine (a quarterly publication of the IMF) titled “World Economy: Convergence, Interdependence, and Divergence” (from PDF page 16)…
This sounds an awful lot like what Zhou is saying, doesn’t it?
The section continues by spouting off the globalist buzzwords of “interdependent” and “multipolar,” then finishes with a one-line bio of the author…
So the author of this article is a high-level member of the Brookings Institution, an Establishment think tank headquartered on Embassy Row in Washington, D.C. And do you care to guess who funds the Brookings Institution?…
“In 1952, Robert Calkins succeeded Moulton as president of the Brookings Institution. He secured grants from the Rockefeller Foundation and the Ford Foundation that put the Institution on a strong financial basis. He reorganized the Institution around the Economic Studies, Government Studies, and Foreign Policy Programs.”
By the way, guess who else has ties to the Brookings Institution…
Given all we’ve seen in this entry and the last, which narrative do you find more likely to be true?
1) That the BRICS Alliance is real, and they’re seizing the globalist institutions from the hands of the “Anglo-American Banking Cabal” in order to stop the NWO?
…or…
2) That the BRICS Alliance is a public relations construct, and within the Worldwide Central Banking Cabal, they’re playing the role of the “solution bringers” who save the day from the “problem creators” in order to garner public acceptance of the NWO?
I’ll leave you to answer that for yourself…
But to help you make a more informed decision, my next entry will be on Russia’s complicity with the Rockefeller NWO.
To begin, let’s take a look at…
The Chinese Economic Propaganda Line
In the aftermath of the US Government “shutdown” of October 2013, I came across a very telling Xinhua article titled U.S. fiscal failure warrants a de-Americanized world. If you’re unfamiliar with the Xinhua News Agency, here is a little snippet from their Wikipedia page…
“The Xinhua News Agency is the state press agency of the People’s Republic of China. Xinhua is a ministry-level department subordinate to the State Council. Its president is a member of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China.”
So the information put forth by Xinhua reflects the official propaganda line of the Chinese Communist Party, which makes what the article said all the more interesting. Here is what I wrote about it at the time…
It should be well known to all by now that the mainstream media, as well as the bulk of the alternative media, are attempting to portray a geopolitical conflict featuring the Anglo-American bankers & NATO on one side and the BRICS bankers & militaries on the other. The brings forward an obvious question: if China and their BRICS allies are really acting in opposition to the Western Establishment, why are they pointing to the Western globalist institutions as the solution to the world’s ills?
To help answer that question, let’s have a closer look at the institutions touted by the Chinese article…
1) The United Nations (UN) – According to the Rockefellers’ Prospect for America blueprint for world government, the United Nations is the international body that will exercise authority over regional groupings of the world’s nations. The institution itself was founded at the behest of the Western central banking families, and it was such a pet project of the Rockefellers that they decided where and how it would be built and provided the land on which it now stands.
The United Nations Headquarters complex “was constructed in stages with the core complex completed between 1948 and 1952. The Headquarters occupies a site beside the East River, on 17 acres of land purchased from the foremost New York real estate developer of the time, William Zeckendorf, Sr. Nelson Rockefeller arranged this purchase, after an initial offer to locate it on the Rockefeller family estate of Kykuit was rejected as being too isolated from Manhattan. The US$8.5 million (adjusted by inflation US$83.4 million) purchase was then funded by his father, John D. Rockefeller, Jr., who donated it to the city. Wallace Harrison, the personal architectural adviser for the Rockefeller family, and a prominent corporate architect, served as the Director of Planning for the United Nations Headquarters. His firm, Harrison and Abramovitz, oversaw the execution of the design.”
Upon clicking the link to the Wikipedia entry on Kykuit (the Rockefeller family estate), I found this extra bit of insight…
“In late 1946 two of [John D. Rockefeller] Junior’s sons, John D. 3rd and Laurance, each offered their respective residences, Rockwood Hall and Fieldwood Farm, as headquarters for the then newly formed United Nations. Family patriarch Junior vetoed the proposals as too isolated from Manhattan. He tasked second son, Nelson, to buy a 6.9-hectare (17-acre) site along the East River, subsequently donated for the construction of the UN Headquarters.”
Don’t you find it interesting that the location of the United Nations Headquarters was decided by an internal discussion amongst John D. Rockefeller Jr. and his sons?
2) The World Bank (WB) – Many people may be unaware that the World Bank is “a United Nations international financial institution that provides loans to developing countries for capital programs. The World Bank is a component of the World Bank Group, and a member of the United Nations Development Group.” It was created at the Bretton Woods Conference of 1944. And what was the formal name of the Bretton Woods Conference? The “United Nations Monetary and Financial Conference.”
3) The International Monetary Fund (IMF) – The IMF was also a creation of the United Nations Monetary and Financial Conference of 1944. And like the World Bank Group, the IMF is a Specialized Agency of the United Nations.
Specialized Agencies are “autonomous organizations working with the United Nations and each other through the coordinating machinery of the United Nations Economic and Social Council at the intergovernmental level, and through the Chief Executives Board for coordination (CEB) at the inter-secretariat level. Specialized agencies may or may not have been originally created by the United Nations, but they are incorporated into the United Nations System by the United Nations Economic and Social Council acting under Articles 57 and 63 of the United Nations Charter.”
So basically, the UN, WB and IMF are part of one giant globalist complex put in place by the Rockefellers and their affiliated global bankster families. Among the banking clans, the Rockefellers had a very prominent role in the creation of the global government because they were the family whose base nation (the US) emerged from World War 2 with the most wealth and power. The Rockefellers had the biggest tool at their disposal (America), so they wore that tool down to the nub to build the NWO. And this globalist complex is what the Chinese offer as the solution to the world’s problems (which also were created by the bankster families)?
With an overview of the globalist complex in place, let’s have a look at more of what the Chinese have been saying.
China’s Central Banker and the IMF
In the course of researching this article, I came across a link to a March 2009 speech by Zhou Xiaochuan…
…titled “Reform the International Monetary System.”
The speech was given during the depths of the 2007-2009 financial crisis and follows the globalists’ standard “let’s create a problem, then offer our solution” template. He begins by pointing to the problems posed by the (engineered) economic meltdown, then he goes on to explain how a new kind of global reserve currency would solve all those problems. Finally, he makes his recommendation…
“The scope of using the SDR should be broadened, so as to enable it to fully satisfy the [IMF] member countries’ demand for a reserve currency.”
His recommendation for the gradual replacement of existing national reserve currencies with the IMF’s Special Drawing Right (SDR) is the same thing the Western banksters have been calling for since the SDR’s creation (see Mainstream globalist propaganda reveals East/West conflict is a farce).
Zhou’s speech is such a classic example of the problem / reaction / solution strategy that I recommend reading it in its entirety. If you find such speeches too dry and difficult to understand, though, I’ll provide an explanation of the key passages from the speech in Update 1 at the bottom of this article.
Governance changes will turn evil globalist institutions into good?
Bankster propagandists attempt to explain-away the BRICS Alliance’s adherence to the globalist institutions by making the argument that the Alliance is somehow outmaneuvering the Western elite and taking over the institutions from within. In fact, Zhou makes mention of “voice and representation reform” for the IMF in his speech, and he brings it up again in PDF page 4 of his International Monetary and Financial Committee statement from October 11 of this year…
This widely-parroted propaganda theme of instituting governance reforms to end the “unipolar” dominance of the global institutions by the United States and their Western allies would be convincing except for one thing: the Rockefeller propagandists are using the same talking points as the BRICS propagandists. Here is a portion of an article from Finance and Development Magazine (a quarterly publication of the IMF) titled “World Economy: Convergence, Interdependence, and Divergence” (from PDF page 16)…
This sounds an awful lot like what Zhou is saying, doesn’t it?
The section continues by spouting off the globalist buzzwords of “interdependent” and “multipolar,” then finishes with a one-line bio of the author…
So the author of this article is a high-level member of the Brookings Institution, an Establishment think tank headquartered on Embassy Row in Washington, D.C. And do you care to guess who funds the Brookings Institution?…
“In 1952, Robert Calkins succeeded Moulton as president of the Brookings Institution. He secured grants from the Rockefeller Foundation and the Ford Foundation that put the Institution on a strong financial basis. He reorganized the Institution around the Economic Studies, Government Studies, and Foreign Policy Programs.”
By the way, guess who else has ties to the Brookings Institution…
Given all we’ve seen in this entry and the last, which narrative do you find more likely to be true?
1) That the BRICS Alliance is real, and they’re seizing the globalist institutions from the hands of the “Anglo-American Banking Cabal” in order to stop the NWO?
…or…
2) That the BRICS Alliance is a public relations construct, and within the Worldwide Central Banking Cabal, they’re playing the role of the “solution bringers” who save the day from the “problem creators” in order to garner public acceptance of the NWO?
I’ll leave you to answer that for yourself…
But to help you make a more informed decision, my next entry will be on Russia’s complicity with the Rockefeller NWO.
Mainstream globalist propaganda reveals East/West conflict is a farce (Update 1)
…here is a little blast from the past…
…It is the cover from the January 9, 1988 issue of The Economist magazine. Note the phoenix rising from the ashes of burning national currencies, including the dollar.
The cover relates to an article on pages 9-10 titled Get ready for the phoenix, which foretold the financial drama we are now watching unfold in real time. Upon stumbling across them, I found the cover art and the article so striking that I thought they might be an online forgery, so I verified their authenticity with a research librarian at the Newspaper and Current Periodical Room of the Library of Congress. Both the cover and the article are quite real. Here are some excerpts (not necessarily in the order in which they appear in the article)…
>>> THIRTY years from now, Americans, Japanese, Europeans, and people in many other rich countries, and some relatively poor ones will probably be paying for their shopping with the same currency. Prices will be quoted not in dollars, yen or D-marks but in, let’s say, the phoenix. The phoenix will be favoured by companies and shoppers because it will be more convenient than today’s national currencies, which by then will seem a quaint cause of much disruption to economic life in the last twentieth century…
…The phoenix would probably start as a cocktail of national currencies, just as the Special Drawing Right is today. In time, though, its value against national currencies would cease to matter, because people would choose it for its convenience and the stability of its purchasing power…
…The phoenix zone would impose tight constraints on national governments. There would be no such thing, for instance, as a national monetary policy. The world phoenix supply would be fixed by a new central bank, descended perhaps from the IMF…
…Governments are far from ready to subordinate their domestic objectives to the goal of international stability. Several more big exchange-rate upsets, a few more stockmarket crashes and probably a slump or two will be needed before politicians are willing to face squarely up to that choice…
…Pencil in the phoenix for around 2018, and welcome it when it comes. <<<
It’s all there: the SDR “cocktail” (basket) of currencies, the IMF’s central role, and the need to create “exchange rate upsets, stockmarket crashes, and economic slumps” to make the public accept it. Seeing such an accurate forecast/blueprint, one wonders who was behind its publishing. So if we look into The Economist magazine, we find it is headquartered just a few blocks from the City of London and is owned by The Economist Group, which itself is owned by some rather interesting characters…
“The Economist Group is 50% owned by Pearson PLC via The Financial Times Limited. The bulk of the remaining shares are held by individual shareholders including the Cadbury, Rothschild, Schroder, Agnelli and other family interests as well as a number of staff and former staff shareholders.”Continue reading HERE
The Rockefeller Plan for the BRICS New World Order, in their own words… (Update 1 – Putin and Kissinger’s friendship)
.....Why China? Why would the Illuminati, whose home base is in Western Europe, have the Chinese front the public face of their New World Order? A clue to their motivations and strategy can be found in this article, titled “Colonial Elite Rules China for the Illuminati.” In it, the author states…
“The Chinese people would revolt against overt foreign domination, but embrace their place in the NWO if they believed they were in control.”
The Chinese have suffered greatly at the hands of Western imperialism, as has much of the world. As a result, the Illuminati would have trouble roping many nations into a Western-led New World Order, especially the nationalistic Chinese. Since you can’t have a truly global order without the most populous nation on Earth, the Illuminati opted to use their own legacy of destruction to their advantage. Their two-part strategy to do so is as follows:
1 – They set up a China-centered alliance as an opposing force to the Western alliance.
This part of the strategy was hinted at in the mainstream press in this 2002 UPI article, titled “China Wants Its Own ‘New World Order’ To Oppose US Version.” It is common practice for the Cabal to use opposing forces to achieve their ends, and they always make sure they have influence or control over both sides.
2 – They have been driving the world public into the hands of the Chinese alliance.
How have they approached this, you ask?
> They have widely publicized a heinous New World Order planned by the Western Powers while simultaneously publicizing a benign New World Order planned by China and its allies (thus establishing danger from one side and safety from another).
> They have instigated outrageous and provocative action, both economic and military, by the Western powers (this adds a new insight into the open-for-all-to-see Wall Street / City of London criminality and recent Western military boondoggles in Afghanistan, Iraq, Egypt, Libya, and Syria).
> They have broadly exposed damaging information about Western nations, especially the US. This is the motivation behind WikiLeaks, Snowden, and a thousand smaller disclosures. And after Snowden outed the NSA’s activities to the general public, where did he run to hide? First to China (Hong Kong), then to Russia. So what is the psychological message? China and Russia (the BRICS alliance) are where you run for safety from the evil US, its Western allies, and all their horrible behavior.
It is really very simple: the Illuminati built a rabbit trap (in the BRICS alliance) that looks like a nice, safe hole to hide from danger. Now they are beating the bushes (with the Western powers) to drive the rabbits toward the trap.<<<
Clearly, the globalists took into account “the aspirations of peoples all over the globe… to emerge rapidly and conclusively from the era of colonialism” in their planning of the NWO. It is for this reason that the BRICS alliance was formed and the NWO was designed in a multipolar fashion. They want the oppressed peoples of the world to join together and see themselves beating the West. And they want them to believe that the Illuminati’s multipolar New World Order represents their final victory over oppression and ascension to equality, when it is actually just the beginning of a new phase of subjugation and their fall into equality as global serfs.
With the Rockefeller plan for the BRICS New World Order laid out before us, let’s take a look at how it was implemented.
China: Building up the False Savior
Major moves towards building the New World Order outlined in Prospect for America began in the late sixties…
1969 – The International Monetary Fund (IMF) introduces the Special Drawing Right, the planned replacement for the US dollar as the global reserve currency…
July 1971 – former Special Studies Project director Henry Kissinger held secret meetings in China to lay the groundwork for their introduction onto the global stage.
Continue Reading HERE