Saturday 11 May 2013

transcription of Paul Hellyer testimony: People's Disclosure

Transcription of the video titled, "2 Living ET's Working With US Government" posted on Vimeo at 

Opening with Congressmen Merrill Cook, Republican from Utah:
" Let's go to our stand to Honorable Paul Hellyer from Canada, we would give you 20 minutes, sir."
Honorable Paul Hellyer begins his testimony:
"Thank you very much Mr. Chair, and thank you for giving me this opportunity to speak, and thank you Steve (Steven Basset) for inviting me to speak.
My name, as said, is Paul Hellyer, I am a former Minister of Defense for Canada. I served in three governments, during a total of 23.5 years of Parliament. Although as Minister of National Defense, I had sighting reports of U.F.O.'s, I was too busy to be concerned about them because I was trying to unify the Army, Navy, and Air Force into a single Canadian Defense Force, and that itself was a kind-of battle to the finish. So, this was not high on my agenda, but about 10 years ago I started getting interested due to a young man from Ottawa sending me material on the subject. I told him I was too busy to read it, but he had confidence that someday I would. He sent me a copy of Colonel Corso's book, The Day After Roswell. It took me awhile to get around to reading it, but I took it for my summer reading in 2005, and was really impressed with what was contained in it. What I thought to myself was, 'there are huge issues here, HUGE issues, and the American People and the People of the World have a right to know what's going on because they're part of it, it's not just an isolated thing.'
So after confirming the contents of the book, the Retired United States General, I accepted the invitation of Victor Viggiani and his co-hort Mike Byrd, to speak at a symposium at the University of Toronto and I said; "UFO's are as real as the airplanes flying overhead." That gave me the dubious distinction of being the first cabinet member of government rank in the G8 group of countries to say so unequivocally.
(Audience applause)
Since then I have learned alot from many sources, including a number of the fantastic witnesses that we have heard these last four days. They are so outstanding, I was really blown away with them, the amount of information available, and I appreciate every single one of them. But because I am not a ufologist, I'm a politician, there are only a few things that I want to add in that particular realm.
First is in the 1960s, a flotilla of UFO's headed south into NATO territory, and the Commander in Chief of the Supreme Allied Orders(SHAPE) in Europe was naturally very shaken. Fortunately, or maybe Divine Providence, before the panic button was pushed, the flotilla turned around and headed back north. Obviously, they thought maybe they were Russian, and they were very concerned about it. The investigation was launched into this whole subject, and a document was prepared which concluded that at least four species had been visiting earth for 1000s of years, and this is my own view at this stage as well.
Except for that, there are a couple of things that we have talked about that I'd like to refer to, and one is that we refer to them as "They" until this morning when Linda Moulton-Howe, I think she was the first one, actually named three different species. I have brought my latest book called, "Light At The End Of The Tunnel: A Survival Plan For The Human Species", as an aid memoir, and I named five different species here. I am aware of more now, as a matter of fact, I saw a document just a few days ago that mentioned twenty. I think you, Mr. Chairman, might be interested in some of the places they might come from. I have in here, Zeta Reticuli, the Pleiades, Orion, Andromeda, and the Altair star systems. So I do not think we can anymore refer to them as "They", because they are not an amorphous mass. They are different species, and consequently may have different agendas. I don't think we can say they have the same agenda anymore than we can say the United States, China, and Russia have the same agenda. Our real interests may be very similiar, but as of now, our perceived interests are far apart.
One more observation before I begin what I want to say, and that is that we spend a lot of time talking about the 6 year old cadavers, and I was glad to hear Linda (Moulton-Howe) say that their are live ETs on earth at this present time, and at least two of them working with United States Government. Some of the other species that I have learned about not too long ago, was called the Tall Whites, when Paula Harris broke the story just a few years ago. Through her good offices, I had the chance to talk for about three hours with Former Airmen Charles Hall, and listened to this absolutely fascinating story of how he was working with... First of all, he was scared out of his skin, but after that, when he got to know them, how he was working with, and finally they became to trust each othernd have and have a good working relationship with the Tall Whites at the Gunnery Range at Indian Springs, Nevada. These Tall Whites were living on United States Air Force property, and working in cooperation with the United States Air Force and sharing technology with them. He (Charles Hall) wrote a book, incidentally, called "Millenial Hospitality", there are four different versions, but Hall says that "Millenial Hospitality #2" is the best, and that is the one I read, and it is a very interesting read, if you want to get inside the problem of what it is like to bump into these people floating across the terrain in the desert.
Enough on that for now, my interest is in full disclosure. My only caveat is that probably 95-98% full disclosure, I have known of 1 or 2 things that should not be in the public domain, at least not yet, it will be someday I am sure, but maybe not immediatly. But just as some children survive the idea of tooth fairy, and santa claus when they become adult, I think that taxpaying citizens are quite capable of accepting the new and broader reality that we live in a cosmos teeming with life of various sorts. The fact that some civilizations are more advanced than ours, may be humbling, but that could be a necessary step in our survival.
The world is an unholy mess, we have at best until the end of this decade. In my book, I said we have 10 years to stop global warming if we don't want it to be beyond the point of no return. Two years have gone past since it was written, so I say we have until the end of the decade to arrest global warming, yet our leaders don't even talk of it, except in a superficial way. They appear to be more interested in starting wars to control oil, and in effect prolong the gravity of the effect. Of course, even if they took the threat seriously, they wouldn't have the finances to finance the transition from oil to clean energy because we have an infinitely silly banking and financial system in the Western World.
(audience applause)
The United States congress, I regret to say, is partly responsible, and I would be glad to elaborate on this, if you are interested. Finally, they need the technology for clean energy, and it exists, and is kept secret by the same vested interests that control our destiny. Who are these vested interests, and what are they up to?
Well, Senator, you were talking about a military unta, well in my opinion that is true, but I have broadened and deepened the definition to Cabal, and the Cabal comprises members of the three sisters. The Council on Foreign Relations, The Bilderbergers, and The Tri-Lateral Commission, The International Banking Cartel, The Oil Cartel, members of various Intelligence organizations, and select members of the military unta. Together, have become a shadow government of not only the United States, but of much of the Western World. The Council on Foreign Relations is the oldest of the three sisters, and as early as October 1940, years before Germany surrendered to the Allied Armies and to vaporize Hitler's vision of empire, The Councils Economic and Finance group drafted a memorandum outlining a comprehensive policy, quote "to set forth the political, military, territorial, and economic requirements of the United States and its political potential leadership of the non-German world, including the United Kingdom itself, as well as the Western Hemisphere and the Far East."
-Mr. Cook clears his throat-
The council made absolutely no effort to disguise the fact that the purpose of the grand area, and later hegemony, was to support an expanding U.S. economy, and to provide it with raw materials and products for its markets. This was labeled the "National Interest" quoth on quote. It was equally clear that the National Interest was the interest of the ruling elite, whose members comprised of the Council. The real interests of rank and file Americans was never a factor in the equation.
Mr. David Rockefeller was a member of all three of the sisters, and is quoted as saying this in a meeting of the Bilderbergers in Europe; "We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time Magazine, and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings, and have respected their promises of discretion for almost 40 years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the likes of publicity during those years. But the world is more sophisticated, and prepared to march toward a world government, a supernational soverignty of an intellectual elite, and world bankers is surely more preferable than the auto-determination practiced in past centuries." He, of course, pretended he didn't say that, but the witness is reported by Daniel Estulin, a thoroughly reliable reporter who has written "The True Story of the Bilderberger Group" and if you really want to get inside of what's been going on there for this long time, that's a good place to go.
So, anyway, you hear what Mr. Rockefeller said, and so there you have it. The aim of the game is a World Government, comprising members of a cabal, who are electedby noone, and accountable to noone, and according to Mr. Rockefeller, the plan is well advanced. Does this help you to understand why our Civil Rights are being taken away from us? I say us, because Canada, too, is included in the grand plan.
A giant leap in the wrong direction followed the end of the Cold War. Noone could have been happier than I was when the Berlin Wall came down on November the 9th, 1989. The elation on our side of the curtain was universal, and very significant on the other side, as one country after another regained its freedom. Nearly everyone believed it was the dawn of a new era of peace and prosperity for people everywhere. There was much talk of a peace dividend. The prospects were dazzling, dazzling in their scope and diversity. It was a unique and God given opportunity for a new braver and fairer world. We blew it! We blew the chance of a lifetime to do good things.
A small group of zealots undermined our golden opportunity to pursue peace , not war, and little did we dream that they had a vastly different vision of the New World Order. Their plan, which is now commonly known as the Project for a New American Century, include prevent of wars, in clear violation of International Law, regime change wherever and whenever the U.S. desires, and if they can get away with it without excessive casualties, of the establishment a kind of economic and cultural hegemony with America acting as "constabulary" quoth on quote, that was their word, globally. This was to be established with out authorit of the United Nations, and without constraint of existing International Treaties. It would involve a military build-up of unprecedented in peace-time history, and could trigger an arms race, which is precisely the opposite to a peace dividend that the world had looked forward to.
The Machiavellian scheme involved Secret Police, the curtailment of Civil Liberties in defiance of the U.S. Constitution, and a morebundt economy operating way below its potential. Exactly those features for which the Soviet Union was held in contempt. The intial draft of the document was so controversial when it was leaked to the New York Times, that it had to be rewritten. It was not changed very much, just the cosmetics, enough to make it politically acceptable.
The document said this: "It may have been easy to persuade President Bush to abandon his stated policy of not getting United States more involved in International Affairs, but persuading the American people would be more difficult. Sophisticated adults would question such a giant sea change of policy." The authors of building America's defenses, strategies, and resources for a New Century recognized the difficulties from the outset, because their document contained the following sentence: "Further the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary changes, its likely to be a long one, absent of some catastrophic and catalyzing event, like a new Pearl Harbor."
It wasn't too long before they got their catastrophic and catalyzing event, terrorist struck the World Trade Center in New York and the Pentagon in Washington on September the 11th, 2001. Incidentally, they have removed the sentence about Pearl Harbor on the document that you can find on the Internet. Almost the whole world mourned, Canada mourned, the overwhelming majority of Muslims condemned the attacks. My sympathy for the families of the injured and dead was genuine and unwavering to this day.
My sympathy for the United States Government began to grow quite thin, however, when I heard President Bush cite the reasons for the attack. I quote, "Why do they hate us?", he asked rhetorically in an address to the congress. "They hate what they see right here in this chamber, a democratically elected government. Their leaders are self-appointed. They hate our freedoms, our freedom of religion, our freedom of speech, our freedom to vote, to disassemble, to disagree with each other." I felt sad when I heard the president's word, I assumed that he believed what he was saying, but if that were true he was profoundly ignorant of the real thoughts and feelings of people in other parts of the world. If he wanted to hear the truth, he should have listened to Osama Bin Laden, who was well informed of the kind of orgins of fanatically hatred in the United States, which has lead to such treachery.
This is his [sic](Osama Bin Laden) version of events: "Every Muslim must rise to defend his religion. The wind of faith is blowing, and the wind of change is blowing to remove evil from the pential of Mohammed. Peace be upon him. As to America, I say to you and it's people a few words, I swear to God that America will not live in peace before peace reigns in Palastine, and before all the armies of infidels depart the land of Mohammed. Peace be upon him."
That is clear enough, the dislike of America has nothing to do with Democracy vs. Dictatorship, or wealth, or freedom of religion, or freedom of assembly, it is directly related to American footdragging and stickhandling at the Palestinan question.
-Mr. Cook interrupts Hon. Hellyer to give him two minutes warning.-
In short, American foreign policy was the root of the conflict.
So here we are more than a decade later fighting another war that can't be won. There is no country powerful enough to protect its citizens from fanatical hate, as we learn from the Boston Marathon. The mere attempt to pursue the impossible, pits neighbor against neighbor, and the state power structure against everyone. All of the freedoms won by the millions of men and women who fought and died in World War 2 are being flushed unceremoniously down the drain.
The only hope of peace is to negotiate a settlement, this will require a paradigm shift in America attitudes. It involves a defacto renunciation of the Plan for a New American Energy, and the adoption of a pledge for cooperation with all humankind, to build the kind of world which we are collectively capable of. Young people everywhere need to be challenged by a noble cause, they need to be involved in arresting global warming, creating a banking system that is just and sustainable, and lead the way to the transformation to the new reality that we have to live in harmony with our celestial neighbors, as well as seeking peace on earth.
In a word, we have to become spiritual beings, and practice the ONE tenet that the World's major religions have in common, that is, The Golden Rule.
This is from the late Dr. John Mack, an American Secular Jewish Psychiatrist, who became a world leader interviewee of abductees, or experiencers as he called them, came to this conclusion in a startling book, "Passport To The Cosmos", quote "Although the aliens themselves are not Gods, their behavior is anything but Godlike. Abductees consistently report that the beings seem closer to God than we are, acting as messengers, guardian spirits, or angels, intermediaries between us and the Divine Source."
Thank you

Victor Viggiani article in the Toronto Examiner, April 28, 2013
2005 Toronto Exopolitics Symposium
Paul Hellyer former Canadian Minister of National Defense
Robert O'Dean, former NATO SHAPE officer and his testimony on the movie "Fastwalkers"

Former Canadian Parliamentary Member, the Honorable Paul Hellyer's profile on

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.