Here are Jim Stones thoughts about the Germanwing Plane crash into the Alps this week. I've gone through and copied all of the relevant material as Jim's site doesn't have "separate articles" that can be referred back to by a link or date.
I will be discussing this obviously preset up, sacrificial "accident" on Transpicuous News Tomorrow night in depth. There is a LOT of shit going on right now....
d
Someone killed a big lie for me - the cockpit door!
A forward-opening hinge door separates the cockpit from the passenger
compartment. It has three electric locking strikes, controlled by the
flight crew. In normal conditions, when the door is closed, they remain
locked. When there is a request to enter the cockpit, the flight crew
can authorize entry by unlocking the door, that remains closed until it
is pushed open.
When the flight crew does not respond to requests for entry, the door
can also be unlocked by the cabin crew, by entering a two to seven-digit
code (programmed by the airline) on the keypad, installed on the
lateral side of the Forward Attendant Panel (FAP).
DEAR REMI, PLEASE ASSIST! WE NEED SOME MORE "TRUTH TELLING", PLEASE, WERE BOTH PILOTS SUICIDAL ALONG WITH EVERY STEWARDESS?
THE EXPERIENCED PILOT LEFT THE COCKPIT TO TRY TO FIND A TECHNICAL REASON
FOR WHY THEY LOST CONTROL OF THE AIRCRAFT AFTER ENTERING FRENCH
AIRSPACE AND THE REST IN THE PRESS ABOUT A SUICIDE PILOT IS A SCAMMING
ZIO LIE.
Understand that the French government now has to front every
type of lie possible to bury the truth. They cannot accept
responsibility for fulfilling this agenda, and did not expect to get
caught. Lying is now their only option.
These lies are test run on public forums to see what will sell. When a
lie is told that people go for, that is what gets published as "a new
discovery".
It will be important to not drift from the facts, which are set in bedrock. They are:
Irrefutable fact 1: A remote hijack recovery system was
available, and was not used to recover this A320 even though it was
obviously in distress. On the A320, a pilot is rendered completely
disabled when this system is activated. On the 757/67 the pilot still
has influence but has to fight like hell against it once activated.
This
was clearly discussed on the Boeing web site in pilots blogs, when I
accidentally got into a secure area looking for answers after 911.
There was lots of information I have not put into this report to keep it
readable, but it was DETAILED, such as, the actual computer that is
responsible for the remote option on the 757/67 is UNDER A FLOOR PANEL
AT THE FRONT OF THE PASSENGER COMPARTMENT. That's classified info, and
cold hard proof I really did do a great job on the Boeing web site for
those who are in the know.
I am trying to be a little more clear here so the intelligence
agencies realize that I really did get into a secure area and really do
have accurate info, and maybe they will back off on the GOD DAMN MAIL
CENSORSHIP. It is pointless, I will not be convinced to change this
story, I know what I know and that is the end of it. Trolling and
censoring simply can't cut it.
When
I say France hijacked this airplane and ditched it for a reason, I am
not puffing B.S. - If a nutcase antidepressant pilot decided to whack
the crew and passengers, the correct outcome would have been:THE PLANE
DESCENDED TO 18,000 FEET AND AT THAT TIME GROUND CONTROL TOOK ACTION AND
LANDED IT, PERIOD, END OF DISCUSSION
IF YOU CANNOT ACCEPT THE REMOTE TAKEOVER, YOU CANNOT DENY THE FOLLOWING ANYWAY:
A COMPLETELY ALONE Italian fighter jet issued a mayday call one minute
before this Airbus went into it's descent while in view of it, and then
returned to base.
This is documented, but the reason for the mayday call has never been published, and I know why:
Because "SEVERAL" French fighter jets were in the area, on the edge of
where this Italian fighter jet was allowed to go, taking over this
airbus the second it entered French airspace, AND FOLLOWED IT ALL THE
WAY TO THE CRASH SCENE. The Italian turned around after witnessing the
remote takeover because he was not authorized to go into French
airspace. How do we know this in irrefutable terms? Because witnesses
on the ground saw these French fighter jets following this airbus all
the way up until it crashed, and after the crash was a confirmed reality
THEY BUGGED OUT RATHER THAN STAY AROUND AND ASSESS THE SITUATION.
The fact that these fighter jets got expunged from the ziopress SAYS
IT ALL, but the Ziopress did the cleanup too late, people got
screenshots of the news reports both before and after this, and these
screenshots are below, on this page.
SO, If an Italian fighter jet issued a mayday which is EXTREMELY
UNUSUAL, and immediately returned to base, AND "several" French fighter
jets escorted this airbus into a mountain only to subsequently get
expunged, THE AIRBUS PILOT LEFT THE COCKPIT TO TRY TO FIND A TECHNICAL
REASON FOR WHY THEY LOST CONTROL OF THE AIRCRAFT AFTER ENTERING FRENCH
AIRSPACE AND THE REST IN THE PRESS ABOUT A SUICIDE PILOT IS A SCAMMING
ZIO LIE.
The original report with all the details follows:
Due to a complete blackout of information in the mail boxes, this is
probably as complete as this report can get. Frankly, it is already a
death sentence to the credibility of the French government, so it is
fine the way it is, READ IT AND WEEP, ARCHIVE AND POST!
My remote control claims are well founded:
As mentioned farther down this page, In 2002 I got proof the A320 has
remote hijack recovery as a standard feature in all models when I
"accidentally" got into a secure area of the Boeing web site where
pilots were discussing the differences between aircraft from various
manufacturers. They were discussing this remote hijack recovery system
they all know exists and were questioning why it was not used to stop
911 because both the 757/767 had this system as well. When I say France
crashed this airplane on purpose, I have a damn good reason to say so.
Dear Remi, as the plane had remote hijack recovery built in, why was
that system not activated during the eight minutes during which the
plane was in difficulty and without pilot communication? There was
plenty of time to recognize that the plane was out of control and would
crash without intervention. Why did you not activate the hijack
recovery system? Perhaps you had a different agenda. Perhaps that system was instead being used to fulfill that agenda.
Next up from the liars: THE AGENDA. Lie#354: The suicide pilot Muslim tie-in to get support for that war in Yemen! waiting, waiting, waiting . . . . .
An intentional pilot initiated crash is the only way out for the liars
UPDATE: Cockpit lock out story is a LIE. The manual override that
keeps the cockpit door locked only lasts 5 minutes, per TV reports. That
would leave 3 to 5 minutes to storm the cockpit and take at least some
evasive or corrective action.
As I said right from the beginning, this crash was intentionally created
via remote control, and the plane hit the mountain in perfect working
condition. The investigators know this. I wondered what they would
come up with to hide the fact that this was a government hit.
And
so, now, they are going to say one pilot locked the other out of the
cockpit and then intentionally crashed the plane. Go figure, but here
is Remi suggesting a pilot did it on purpose:
Remi Jouty, director of France's Bureau of Investigation and Analysis:
"So far, we don't have any evidence that points clearly to a technical explanation," the official said.
"So we have to consider the possibility of deliberate human responsibility."
My response: DEAR REMI, YOU KNOW DAMN WELL THAT PLANE HAD REMOTE HIJACK
RECOVERY BUILT IN, WHY NOT CONSIDER THE MISUSE OF THAT SYSTEM?
DEAR REMI, PERHAPS ONE OR BOTH PILOTS LEFT THE COCKPIT TO FIGURE OUT
WHY THEY LOST CONTROL OF THE PLANE AFTER A REMOTE HIJACK. GOT A BETTER
ANSWER? WHY THE SUICIDE PILOT RUSE?
The scenario given by Remi is a lie, the fighter jets say so. HERE IS THE CHECK MATE, AND THERE IS NO WAY OUT OF IT:
They might, in the end, say the fighter jets were there to see why
the plane went into a descent. But if that be the case, fighter jets,
which have very skilled pilots will fly upside down or along side a
distressed jet to look in the cockpit and see what is going on. That
did not happen, we have no word of this, yet THE FIGHTER JETS WERE
THERE. If they were not there to assist the plane or find out what was
going on with the pilots, they were there to destroy the plane, and the
crash of a perfectly working plane proves it. There is no way out of
this.
I do not know the source of the following quote, but evidently it came from a pilot. It first appeared on Barking Moonbat two days ago according to the Google time stamp, AND IT SAYS IT ALL:
"IF France finds the flight recorders, and IF they aren't mangled beyond
use, and IF they make the actual contents public record, then
I won't be at all surprised to find they didn't record a word of cockpit conversation
nor a peep from the passenger cabin. I bet there won't be any records
of any AirPhone usage, or any outgoing messages from any of the cell
phones on board.
I think the plane was hacked. Brought down. A poison gas canister
attached to the air system and triggered by the "seat belts" signal when
the plane reached altitude. And exactly 30 minutes later, the engines
were shut down. Either by programming or by remote control. And the
computer flies the plane perfectly, like a glider in an 8 minute
descent, right into an Alp.
I think looking at the passenger list could be very informative. This
looks like a hit. A major hit, at the level of nation-states or the
largest criminal cartels. Or a worldwide group of fanatics. So, who was on this flight?
Don't expect an honest answer. There are no honest governments."
As mentioned farther down this page, In 2002 I got proof the
A320 has remote hijack recovery as a standard feature in all models when
I "accidentally" got into a secure area of the Boeing web site where
pilots were discussing the differences between aircraft from various
manufacturers. They were discussing this remote hijack recovery system
they all know exists and were questioning why it was not used to stop
911 because both the 757/767 had this system as well. When I say France
crashed this airplane on purpose, I have a damn good reason to say so.
All relevant info regarding this crash, proving it was a government hit and nothing else is below.
Here is the scenario they decided to peddle
One pilot left the cockpit and could not get in. The other pilot was
not responsive until the plane crashed. An arab type terror scenario
has been implied, that the pilot in the cockpit suicide crashed the
plane ON PURPOSE.
PROBLEM. HUGE PROBLEM
HOW DOES THAT EXPLAIN THE FIGHTER JET ESCORTS THEY EXPUNGED FROM
REPORTS, FIGHTER JETS THAT ARE CUTELY CAPTURED AND SHOWN REPORTED BELOW
ON THIS VERY PAGE? If you have not seen this, scroll down to the
captures
This was their "flight recorder discovery" and if you believe that line, I have a bag of moon rocks.
Bottom line? They know they are nailed and this is the only scenario
they have other than a remote controlled crash that can possibly fit
what happened - an autopilot disabling followed by a perfectly
controlled power descent straignt into a mountain. Either they explain
it this way, or the are
FORCED TO ADMIT THIS WAS A REMOTE CONTROL WHACK JOB. FAT CHANCE THEY EVER WILL
If they try to back peddle from the "pilot crashed it on purpose"
angle and just say the pilot passed out, that is a fail because
autopilot was in control and even in the extremely likely event it was
not in control, absent a pilot a plane will keep flying straight and
level until it runs out of fuel. It will not go into a dive by itself.
The biggest problem they can never overcome is the fighter jets that
followed it until it hit the mountain, and then, rather than assess the
situation, they bugged out. THAT SAYS IT ALL, they cannot back track
from that cold hard fact.
They really are stuck with the suicide crash option. Will
people believe it? NOT IF THEY KNOW ABOUT THE FIGHTER JETS. ARCHIVE
AND POST!
It looks to me like Germany paid some "holocaust reparations" with an airplane!
Germanwings downing a legitimate black op
This is easy to tell, because now there are many theories popping up to
divert and distract. There is one new theory, however, that got my
interest and may actually be a clue if it is legit. This theory is that
the fighter jets shot the A320 right before impact with the mountain
and it was smoking as it hit.
This could be plausible for the following reason:
The A320 is a full fly by wire aircraft. If a pilot pushes a pedal or
pulls a lever, it is not hooked up to the mechanics in any way
whatsoever. And if this A320 was equipped with collision avoidance,
this full fly by wire attribute most likely would not have allowed it to
hit the mountain, most likely it would have pulled up on time and
missed.
If this is the case, then the fighter jets would have been
needed to shoot the elevator portion of the tail flaps out, which are
needed to make the aircraft pull up and if the tail is disabled, the
collision avoidance would not have been able to stop the crash.
Absent the tail, the plane could still proceed at full throttle into the
mountain and whatever debris came off the tail would most likely have
simply followed the plane into the mountain and not left a separate
debris path.
This fits the eyewitness scenario quite well, and would
explain the roaring sound people heard continue for several seconds,
this could have easily been caused by a missile launch to blow the tail
out.
Other scenarios, such as a laser brought it down are in my opinion just
diversions, but I will certainly give the scenario of smoke coming from
the aircraft after it was shot while approaching the mountain fair
consideration. Fighter jets and collision avoidance disabling certainly
fit that scenario.
After all
Why would the fighter jets be there to begin with, and then leave
the scene immediately after a crash that would have been obvious to
them? No aircraft, even an ultralight, would go unnoticed by a fighter
jet designed to hunt and kill, THEY KNEW THAT CRASH HAPPENED, WHY DID
THEY LEAVE THE SCENE IMMEDIATELY? If they did not cause it, it would
have been their job to stick around, assess the situation and report
back to the base what the situation was. They did not do this, BIG
QUESTION: WHY NOT?
Mails being tampered with - if you are trying to get through with
information and are not seeing it here, it is because it got blocked. I
have found what might be a good mail provider and will try to
circumvent this problem.
"It is inexplicable how such a thing could happen to a
technically perfect aircraft with experienced, trained at Lufthansa
pilots" - Lufthansa CEO Carsten Spohr
MY RESPONSE: IT IS NOT INEXPLICABLE, READ THE FOLLOWING:
New info on Germanwings crash
It has now been determined that the descent was a perfectly
controlled full throttle dive of a perfectly working aircraft straight
into the side of a mountain. And I know how it happened, details below.
Why no identifiable bodies? I got the answer:
Many people on the web are asking where the people are and how an
airplane can just "vanish" into such tiny pieces. I have the answer.
The crash was done in a way that caused the bodies to be erased so no
person outside the controlled group of investigators could possibly
identify anyone on the flight.
How do you cause bodies to vanish and an airplane to turn into such small pieces?
By having the crash occur at a very high speed. And this particular crash happened at 600 plus MPH.
A 600 plus MPH impact is proven by how badly the plane shredded. And
600 plus MPH crashes do not happen outside of willful intent.
Chris wrote:
About the remote control capabilities of the 757/767 aircraft, you are
right. They were revolutionary aircraft, and Popular Science covered
their release in detail in the early 1980's. In one of the many reports
they did, they talked about how the aircraft were hijack proof and
ground controllable. I cannot find anything on this now, it seems 911
has done away with history and the report that mentioned this is not on
the web. Someone is going to have to dig through the basement to find
it in print.
My response:
I had a subscription to Popular science at that time and remember this.
Additionally, in 2002 I accidentally got into a secure area of the
Boeing web site where pilots were posting about this system and how it
had been removed from all the aircraft after 911. Those who had
experience with airbus said the system was still in A320 aircraft
because Airbus had not been compromised (their coding was more secure).
And this would explain why the fighter jets which accompanied this
Germanwings flight all the way to it's death and then left the scene did
not shoot it down, even though it is more than obvious they were either
responsible for the crash or ordered to witness it.
If erasing
bodies and making them unidentifiable to all but a very controlled group
of investigators was needed to conceal who was on that flight, remote
controlling the aircraft into a mountain after a steep dive at full
throttle would be the best way to do it, and now investigators at the
scene have said the largest body part they have found is the size of a
briefcase. Absolutely no one can be visually identified.
Normal plane crashes do not have such small debris and erased bodies
because pilots slow the plane down and it crashes at around 200 mph, not
600 plus.
Beyond all doubt, the fighter aircraft were responsible for this
crash and whoever ordered this crash wanted the bodies erased. This is
why the fighter jets did not shoot the plane down even though they were
clearly responsible for it's demise. If they had shot the plane, it
would have fallen in large pieces and would have had the bodies be
intact. By using remote to crash the plane after a full throttle dive,
they ensured a perfect crash scene with obliteration of evidence.
This is why no communication with the pilots happened, they were totally
blacked out even after the tower declared an emergency and made
repeated attempts to contact the pilots
long before the crash actually happened and received no response. This is highly unusual, if not completely unprecedented except for the other obvious government jobs, - 911 and flight 370.
They are testing conspiracies to see what will work to fool the public
on forums and blogs right now, before releasing "what the black boxes
said."
The most prevalent theory for why the pilots were silent is
slow depressurization blacked everyone out with no one noticing. This
is bunk.
FOR THE RECORD: The plane peaked out at 38,000 feet, stayed there for
ONE MINUTE, and then did it's death dive. That is not long enough to
black out everyone from a loss of cabin pressure, or "slowly
depressurize the cabin" and once the plane hit 25,000 feet, people would
have woken up even if this theory is what happened. It is an obvious
hoax theory. The plane was simply not high enough long enough for this
theory to hold any water.
Unfiltered mail blurbs from mails that made it.
Hello, Jim. This info. ought to be good for a sarcastic comment
vis-a-vis sep 11 - might want to consider the remnants look like
confetti, but the plane in 5 side polygon was claimed it drove through
multi-foot thick reinforced concrete walls in a row and 2 others punched
through steel framed towers, too. Shouldn't we then see a 40 foot deep
divot hole in the mountainside? tim
_____
Come back to you again with this. Check the flight path radar. At video
016 it is getting hazy (why?). At 019 you still see the big plane on the
right of GWI/18G .... At 020 this plane is vanished. AWAKS could do
that - you know that better tan me cause you are the specialist. Looks
for me like a warning to Merkel concerning not following US instructions
concerninbg WW III ..... Please check
....https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R7PYLmKg8jM
P.S.: The flight had been directed over the Alps, pretty far away from
the direct route. There, where the plane came down, no French citizens
could be hit.
_____
you asked the question Who was on the plane?
In the news moments ago they said that there have been two engineers of Delphi on board of this plane.
Maybe it might be a small piece of info but to get the full pic we need to put them all together.
______
March 24 2015
A320 remote recovery system used to crash German A320, FINAL ANSWER.
Permalink
This is not a joke, or statement that will be redacted, It's OBVIOUS.
PROVEN: FIGHTER JET ESCORTS CRASHED GERMAN JET. SEE CAPTURES BELOW THIS REPORT
UPDATE BELOW MAIN REPORT: SMALL DEBRIS HELPS CONFIRM REMOTE CONTROL CRASH AT 600 PLUS MPH
At the time of 911, there were three well known aircraft that had remote
control hijack recovery as a standard feature. These three aircraft
were the Boeing 757, 767 and the Airbus A320. Though this information
has been buried post 911, If anyone is able to dig expunged history,
all 757/67 aircraft were grounded for over a month after 911. This
grounding is not the same as the grounding of all aircraft that
occurred, it is a separate grounding. The big short term grounding of
all aircraft remains well publicized.
The extended grounding of all 757/67 aircraft was done because the
"white hats" knew the truth about 911 from second one, and ordered all
757/67 planes grounded while the remote hijack recovery systems were
disabled one at a time because they knew how 911 really happened
regardless of the zio spin.
The Airbus A320 was allowed to continue with its remote hijack recovery
systems in place because their access codes were more secure and at that
time there was no hack that would work.
With regard to the present day crash:
If there is nothing to hide, we should already have word of what the
pilots were saying to the tower, which is a cold hard fact with any
crash that is not a black op.
HOWEVER IT IS ALREADY CONFIRMED THE
PILOTS "SAID NOTHING" AND THIS CANNOT BE REDACTED, DO NOT LET THEM GET
AWAY WITH SCAMMING SOMETHING IN IF THEY TRY.
In ALL CASES THAT ARE NOT BLACK OPS where problems happen at cruising
altitude prior to a crash, pilots can always talk, and always have
plenty of time to at least tell the tower what the problem is, plane
crashes are not car accidents that are over in a second. As it turns
out, the plane crash took a full 10 minutes to happen, which means that
the fact that no pilot issued a mayday or radioed the tower had to have
been caused, there is no way the pilots "missed" a 10 minute long crash
in progress. The "slow depressurization" air mask failure conspiracies
being hatched at this time patently ignore the presence of fighter jets
which are the obvious culprit.
This crash happened in France, which means there is no
possibility whatsoever that the pilots were out of reach of a tower.
We should already have all the details, no flight recorder recovery
needed if this crash was legitimate.
You only need two pieces of info to nail this one. They are:
1. No word from the pilots, saying anything was wrong.
2. The plane was flying at a high altitude before this "crash". This
means that the pilots could have at least issued a mayday, and they did
not. Even though they crashed at a high speed, you can't delete that
much altitude before a mayday could be sent or the tower could be
reached the normal way. The only way NO communication can happen is if
they got jammed or someone outside the aircraft disabled any ability to
send a mayday.
Or if the cockpit was suddenly destroyed
All reports are saying the plane crashed while in one piece so structural malfunction can probably be ruled out.
BINGO: THIRD PIECE OF INFO CONFIRMING SHOOT DOWN OR REMOTE CONTROLLED CRASH
"Witnesses have described hearing an explosion 'like the sound of
dynamite' then seeing fighter jets fly past, suggesting the passenger
plane had been under military escort".
It is impossible for the "sound of dynamite" to have been a sonic
boom, because witnesses on the ground heard it before the fighter jets
passed, and a sonic boom arrives AFTER the object causing it passes.
The sound of dynamite was most likely the actual jet crash that the
fighter planes either caused or were ordered to be present to witness.
To the idiots out there who might say "Oh, the conspiracy crowd
solved this before a single investigator arrived at the crash scene:"
There are only a few things you need to know to solve this one, the rest
is just scammery:
1. The plane descended for 10 minutes, and NO WORD FROM THE PILOTS.
How can that happen? Jamming of communications. Who could have jammed
communications?
2. The fighter jets, which were following this Airbus. THEY could have
jammed the communications with ease, AND shot it down. They probably
did not shoot it down OR EVEN NEED TO JAM COMMUNICATIONS because:
3. The plane was equipped with remote control (for "hijack recovery") AS
A STANDARD FEATURE. That level of external control would make
switching off communications via remote control a NO BRAINER.
NO CONTACT WITH THE TOWER SAYS IT ALL, A REMOTE CONTROLLED CRASH REALLY IS THE OVERWHELMING ANSWER.
Why would fighter jets be following at just the right time
anyway? That alone CINCHES IT. We really do need to figure out who was
on that plane.
BUSTED: CENSORSHIP OF NEWS PROVES THE FIGHTER JETS DID INDEED DOWN
THIS GERMAN AIRCRAFT, IF THEY DID NOT, WHY EXPUNGE THE NEWS OF THEIR
PRESENCE?
Here we have a screen capture, provided by a reader, that was taken at
10:44:36. It includes a large amount of the information I have above,
INCLUDING THE FIGHTER JET ESCORTS:
HERE WE HAVE THE EDITED REPORT, WITH THE FIGHTER JETS REMOVED. If they
get put back into the story and lies are hatched for damage control it
is TOO LATE, the fact they chose to expunge this information irrevocably
proves they never wanted these fighter jets to be mentioned, and THAT
SAYS IT ALL. TOO LATE, BUSTED:
So now we have:
1. Plane took forever to crash and pilots never contacted the tower. That is a huge mystery, even according to the tower.
2. An Airbus with a remote control option.
3. Fighter jet escorts, along with a very good description about how they appeared (they were not UFO's)
4. A redaction of the fighter jet escorts.
LOGICAL OUTPUT: 1. The pilots never contacted the tower because 2. The
fighter jets prevented it by either jamming communications or 3. turning
them off via remote control, and then crashing the jet via remote. 4.
Expungement of the fighter jets from the news reports NAILS IT ALL, THIS
ONE IS SHOT DEAD AND SERVED COLD.
5. REMOTE CONTROL WAS USED TO ELIMINATE A SEPARATE DEBRIS FIELD WHICH
WOULD HAVE BEEN CAUSED BY A SHOOT DOWN AND RAISED QUESTIONS.
AND NOW THE BIG QUESTION IS: WHO WAS ON THAT PLANE?
Small debris helps confirm remote controlled crash because it
indicates the plane crashed at 600 plus mph. THIS WOULD NOT HAPPEN
UNLESS IT WAS INTENTIONAL.
Very small
debris proves that the plane hit at 600 plus MPH. There is only one
recognizable piece of the plane left, where 4 windows can be seen.
During a normal crash scenario, the crash will happen between 150 - 220
mph because the pilots have the plane fully slowed down before it hits.
So there are large pieces left to be seen.
However, if this was a remote control crash (as I believe) it
probably happened at full throttle during a dive, which means 600 plus
mph.
How bad is a 15 - 20 mph car crash compared to a 60 plus mph crash?
That is why there is not much left to be seen here . . . . .
March 23 2015
http://82.221.129.208/
